Evaluation of the ProgHW/SW Architectural Design Space of Bandwidth Estimation

1. AXI Reference Guide (2020). https://www.xilinx.com/support/ documentation/ip_documentation/ug761_axi_reference_guide.pdf

2. Alveo U280 Product Brief (2021). https://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/alveo/u280.html

3. Apache Hadoop (2021). https://hadoop.apache.org/

4. AWS High Performance Computing (2021). https://aws.amazon.com/hpc/

5. Intel. Intel DPDK: Data Plane Development Kit (2021). https://dpdk.org/

6. Lookbusy - a synthetic load generator (2021). https://www.devin.com/lookbusy/

7. TCP/IP Socket Opencores (2021). https://opencores.org/projects/tcp_socket

8. Vitis with 100 Gbps TCP/IP Network Stack (2022). https://github.com/fpgasystems/Vitis_with_100Gbps_TCP-IP

9. FPGABandwidth (2023). https://github.com/ftqtfff/FPGABandwidth

10. Aceto, G., Botta, A., Pescapé, A., D’Arienzo, M.: Unified architecture for network measurement: the case of available bandwidth. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 35(5), 1402–1414 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Aloisio, A., Giordano, R., Izzo, V.: Jitter issues in clock conditioning with fpgas. In: NPSS Real Time Conference, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

12. Botta, A., Dainotti, A., Pescapé, A.: Do you trust your software-based traffic generator? IEEE Commun. Maga. 48(9), 158–165 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Carter, R.L., Crovella, M.E.: Measuring bottleneck link speed in packet-switched networks. Perf. Eval. 27, 297–318 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Chou, P.A., Miao, Z.: Rate-distortion optimized streaming of packetized media. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 8(2), 390–404 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Chowdhury, D.D.: Packet timing: network time protocol. In: NextGen Network Synchronization, pp. 103–116. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71179-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Covington, G.A., Gibb, G., Lockwood, J.W., McKeown, N.: A packet generator on the NetFPGA platform. In: The 17th IEEE Symposium on Field Programmable Custom Computing Machines, pp. 235–238 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

17. Emmerich, P., Gallenmüller, S., Raumer, D., Wohlfart, F., Carle, G.: Moongen: a scriptable high-speed packet generator. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 275–287 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

18. Firestone, D., et al.: Azure accelerated networking: SmartNICs in the public cloud. In: The 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), pp. 51–66 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

19. Ghobadi, M., Salmon, G., Ganjali, Y., Labrecque, M., Steffan, J.G.: Caliper: precise and responsive traffic generator. In: The 20th Annual Symposium on High-Performance Interconnects, pp. 25–32. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

20. Groleat, T., et al.: Flexible, extensible, open-source and affordable FPGA-based traffic generator. In: Proceedings of the 1st Edition Workshop on High Performance and Programmable Networking, pp. 23–30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

21. Haecki, R., et al.: How to diagnose nanosecond network latencies in rich end-host stacks. In: USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), pp. 861–877 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

22. Hu, N., Steenkiste, P.: Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 21(6), 879–894 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Jain, M., Dovrolis, C.: End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP Throughput. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 32(4), 295–308 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Jin, G., Tierney, B.: Netest: a tool to measure the maximum burst size, available bandwidth and achievable throughput. In: International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education (ITRE), pp. 578–582. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

25. Jin, G., Tierney, B.L.: System capability effects on algorithms for network bandwidth measurement. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 27–38 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

26. Kagami, N.S., da Costa Filho, R.I.T., Gaspary, L.P.: CAPEST: offloading network capacity and available bandwidth estimation to programmable data planes. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 17(1), 175–189 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

27. LaCurts, K., Deng, S., Goyal, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Choreo: network-aware task placement for cloud applications. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 191–204 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

28. Larsen, S., Sarangam, P., Huggahalli, R., Kulkarni, S.: Architectural breakdown of end-to-end latency in a TCP/IP network. Int. J. Parallel Program. 37(6), 556–571 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

29. Lee, K.S., Wang, H., Weatherspoon, H.: Sonic: precise realtime software access and control of wired networks. In: USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), pp. 213–225 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

30. Leeser, M., Handagala, S., Zink, M.: FPGAs in the Cloud. Authorea (2021). https://doi.org/10.22541/au.163647170.02504770/v1

31. Li, Y., et al.: HPCC: high precision congestion control. In: Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pp. 44–58. Association for Computing Machinery (2019)

    Google Scholar 

32. Liao, G., Znu, X., Bnuyan, L.: A new server I/O architecture for high speed networks. In: The 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, pp. 255–265. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

33. Lin, W., Liang, C., Wang, J.Z., Buyya, R.: Bandwidth-aware divisible task scheduling for cloud computing. Softw. Pract. Exp. 44(2), 163–174 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Liu, X., Ravindran, K., Loguinov, D.: Evaluating the potential of bandwidth estimators. In: The 4th New York Metro Area Networking Workshop (NYMAN) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

35. Moreno, V., del Rio, P.M.S., Ramos, J., Garnica, J.J., Garcia-Dorado, J.L.: Batch to the future: analyzing timestamp accuracy of high-performance packet I/O engines. IEEE Commun. Lett. 16(11), 1888–1891 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Putnam, A., et al.: A reconfigurable fabric for accelerating large-scale datacenter services. In: 2014 ACM/IEEE 41st International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pp. 13–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

37. Ramos, J., del Río, P.S., Aracil, J., de Vergara, J.L.: On the effect of concurrent applications in bandwidth measurement speedometers. Comput. Netw. 55(6), 1435–1453 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Ribeiro, V.J., Riedi, R.H., Baraniuk, R.G., Navratil, J., Cottrell, L.: Pathchirp: efficient available bandwidth estimation for network paths. In: Passive and Active Measurement Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

39. Ruiz, M., Sidler, D., Sutter, G., Alonso, G., López-Buedo, S.: Limago: an FPGA-based open-source 100 GbE TCP/IP stack. In: International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL), pp. 286–292. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

40. Salmon, G., Ghobadi, M., Ganjali, Y., Labrecque, M., Steffan, J.G.: NetFPGA-based precise traffic generation. In: Proceedings of NetFPGA Developers Workshop, vol. 9. Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

41. Shriram, A., Kaur, J.: Empirical evaluation of techniques for measuring available bandwidth. In: International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 2162–2170. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

42. Shriram, A., et al.: Comparison of public end-to-end bandwidth estimation tools on high-speed links. In: Dovrolis, C. (ed.) PAM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3431, pp. 306–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31966-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

43. Skhiri, R., Fresse, V., Jamont, J.P., Suffran, B., Malek, J.: From FPGA to support cloud to cloud of FPGA: state of the art. Int. J. Reconfig. Comput. 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

44. Sommers, J., Barford, P., Willinger, W.: Laboratory-based calibration of available bandwidth estimation tools. Microprocess. Microsyst. 31(4), 222–235 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Strauss, J., Katabi, D., Kaashoek, F.: A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tools. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 39–44 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

46. Wang, H., Lee, K.S., Li, E., Lim, C.L., Tang, A., Weatherspoon, H.: Timing is everything: accurate, minimum overhead, available bandwidth estimation in high-speed wired networks. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 407–420 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

47. Yasukata, K., Honda, M., Santry, D., Eggert, L.: Stackmap: low-latency networking with the OS stack and dedicated NICs. In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 2016), pp. 43–56 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

48. Yin, Q., Kaur, J., Smith, F.D.: Can bandwidth estimation tackle noise at ultra-high speeds? In: IEEE 22nd International Conference on Network Protocols, pp. 107–118 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

49. Zhou, H., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Huai, X.: Difficulties in estimating available bandwidth. In: International Conference on Communications, vol. 2, pp. 704–709. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

50. Zilberman, N., Audzevich, Y., Covington, G.A., Moore, A.W.: NetFPGA SUME: toward 100 Gbps as research commodity. IEEE Micro 34(5), 32–41 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references