[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Robot Nudgers. What About Transparency?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2022 Collocated Workshops (SEFM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13765))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 702 Accesses

Abstract

Robot nudgers – i.e. robots who employ nudges to steer users toward targeted behaviours – are a concrete reality nowadays. Although robot nudgers look like a promising technology for making individuals and society better off, some ethically relevant questions in programming them have been so far under-examined. The paper aims to contribute to filling this gap, identifying two ethical issues concerning nudges’ transparency relevant when robots step into the shoes of nudgers. I proceed as follows. The paper begins by outlining what policy tools can be considered nudges (Sect. 1) and why scholars advocate for making their implementation transparent in order to shield persons’ decision-making autonomy (Sect. 2). Therefore, I focus on the still unripe literature on robot-nudging and, in light of it, I properly frame ethical issues concerning nudges’ transparency in human-robot interactions (Sect. 3). In Sect. 4, I discuss two ethically relevant points concerning transparency in robot-nudging so far overlooked. First, Robot nudgers - in contrast with human-nudgers - are potentially able to customize the kind of transparency granted to a specific user. Second, robot nudgers are able to monitor the impact of any feasible mixes of nudges and transparency on the effectiveness of the nudges in steering decision-makers. In both cases, ethically relevant questions emerge. I conclude by advocating for the involvement of ethicists in robot nudgers’ programming at an early stage, in line with an integrative approach to social robotics (Sect. 5).

This work has been supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, prot. UI/BD/152568/2022.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 79.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 99.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This does not amount to saying that informing cannot be a form of nudging; instead, informing should be considered a form of nudging when cognitive biases are exploited (see [26]).

  2. 2.

    It is reasonable to believe that the same could result from boosting strategies, in which decisionmakers are put in the condition to exercise their agency [13].

References

  1. Ali Mehenni, H., Kobylyanskaya, S., Vasilescu, I., Devillers, L.: Nudges with conversational agents and social robots: a first experiment with children at a primary school. In: D’Haro, L.F., Callejas, Z., Nakamura, S. (eds.) Conversational Dialogue Systems for the Next Decade. LNEE, vol. 704, pp. 257–270. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8395-7_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Barton, A., Grüne-Yanoff, T.: From libertarian paternalism to nudging—and beyond. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 6(3), 341–359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0268-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bicchieri, C.: Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure and Change Social Norms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borenstein, J., Arkin, R.: Robotic nudges: the ethics of engineering a more socially just human being. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22(1), 31–46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9636-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borenstein, J., Arkin, R.C.: Nudging for good: robots and the ethical appropriateness of nurturing empathy and charitable behavior. AI Soc. 32(4), 499–507 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0684-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bovens, L.: The ethics of nudge. In: Grüne Yanoff, T., Hansson, S.O. (eds.) Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology, pp. 207–219. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruns, H., Kantorowicz Reznichenko, E., Jonsson, M.L., Rahali, B.: Can nudges be transparent and yet effective? J. Econ. Psychol. 65, 41–59 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calboli, S., Graziani, P., Even, J.: The ethics of robot-nudgers’ design. In: Proceedings of Robophilosophy. IOS Press (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Casal, S., Guala, F., Mittone, L.: On the transparency of nudges: an experiment. CEEL Working Papers no. 1902 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman, G.B., Li, M., Colby, H., Yoon, H.: Opting in vs opting out of influenza vaccination. JAMA 304, 43–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B., Griskevicius, V.: A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consum. Res. 35(3), 472–482 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1086/586910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grüne-Yanoff, T.: Why behavioural policy needs mechanistic evidence. Econ. Philos. 32(3), 463–483 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267115000425c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grüne-Yanoff, T., Hertwig, R.: Nudge versus boost: how coherent are policy and theory? Mind. Mach. 26, 149–183 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hang, C., Ono, T., Yamada, S.: Designing nudge agents that promote human altruism. In: Li, H., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 13086, pp. 375–385. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen, P.G.: The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: does the hand fit the glove? Eur. J. Risk Regul. 7(1), 155–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00005468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, P.G., Jespersen, A.M.: Nudge and the manipulation of choice: a framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 41, 3–28 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hausman, D.M., Welch, B.: Debate: to nudge or not to nudge. J. Polit. Philos. 18(1), 123–136 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard, M., Sparrow, R.: Nudge nudge, wink wink: sex robots as social influencers. In: Fan, R., Cherry, M.J. (eds.) Sex Robots. PSCC, vol. 28, pp. 57–74. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82280-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Huber, J., Payne, J.W., Puto, C.: Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consum. Res. 9(1), 90–98 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ivanković, V., Engelen, B.: Nudging, transparency, and watchfulness. Soc. Theory Pract. 45, 43–73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20191751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klincewicz, M.: Robotic nudges for moral improvement through stoic practice. Techné: Res. Philos. Technol. 23(3), 425–455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2019122109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann, B.A., Chapman, G.B., Franssen, F.M., Kok, G., Ruiter, R.A.: Changing the default to promote influenza vaccination among health care workers. Vaccine 34, 1389–1392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levine, D.K.: Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., Rajpal, S.: Warning: you are about to be nudged. Behav. Sci. Policy 1, 35–42 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Loewenstein, G., Charter, N.: Putting nudges in perspective. Behav. Public Policy 1(1), 26–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. OECD: Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. OECD Publishing, Paris (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Page, L.C., Castleman, B.L., Meyer, K.: Customized nudging to improve FAFSA completion and income verification. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 42(1), 3–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719876916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Park, S., Moshkina, L., Arkin, R.C.: Mood as an affective component for robotic behavior with continuous adaptation via learning momentum. In: Proceedings of 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rea, S., Schneider, S., Kanda, T.: “Is this all you can do? Harder!”: the effects of (im)polite robot encouragement on exercise effort. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 225–233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444660

  31. Rodogno, R.: Nudging by social robots. In: Nørskov, M., Seibt, J., Quick, O.S. (eds.) Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy, pp. 337–345. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. SAGE: Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization. Report of the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt, A.: The power to nudge. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 111(2), 404–417 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Seibt, J.: Integrative social robotics–a new method paradigm to solve the description problem and the regulation problem? In: Seibt, J., Nørskov, M., Andersen, S.S. (eds.) What Social Robots Can and Should Do: 104–114. Springer, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seibt, J., Damholdt, M., Vestergaard, C.: Five principles of integrative social robotics. In: Seibt, J., Nørskov, M., Coeckelbergh, M., Loh, J., Funk, M. (eds.) Envisioning Robots in Society – Power, Politics, and Public Space Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2018, pp. 28–42. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smith, C., Goldstein, D., Johnson, E.: Choice without awareness: ethical and policy implications of defaults. J. Public Policy Mark. 32, 159–172 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., Greenberg, J.: Understanding psychological reactance. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie 223(4), 205–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thaler, R.H.: Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. W. W. Norton & Company (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: The Final Edition (Revised edn.). Penguin Books (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481), 453–458 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilkinson, T.M.: Nudging and manipulation. Polit. Stud. 61(2), 341–355 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00974.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Stefano Calboli

Authors
  1. Stefano Calboli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Calboli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA, USA

    Paolo Masci

  2. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Cinzia Bernardeschi

  3. University of Urbino, Urbino, Pesaro-Urbino, Italy

    Pierluigi Graziani

  4. Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter, Berlin, Germany

    Mario Koddenbrock

  5. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Maurizio Palmieri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Calboli, S. (2023). Robot Nudgers. What About Transparency?. In: Masci, P., Bernardeschi, C., Graziani, P., Koddenbrock, M., Palmieri, M. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2022 Collocated Workshops. SEFM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26236-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26236-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26235-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26236-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation