[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Counter Effect Rules Mining in Knowledge Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13514))

  • 634 Accesses

Abstract

Discovering causal relationships is the goal of many experiments in science. Such a relationship indicates that a variation in an attribute, i.e., the treatment, implies a variation, i.e., has an effect, on another attribute, i.e., the outcome. Mining causal relationships have been studied in a recent approach in Knowledge Graphs, where differential causal rules are mined. Such rules express an effect of a treatment on a subset of instances described by a graph pattern named strata. However, these rules can be difficult to interpret, especially when a treatment has different effects depending on the strata it is expressed on. This paper presents counter effect rules that can be discovered from differential causal rules to facilitate their interpretation. This representation allows to point out the strata that lead to opposite effects for the same treatment. Our experiment shows that counter effect rules can be discovered on a real dataset.

Supported by the DATAIA institute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 27.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 34.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The value 1 for predicate hasOpinion represents a person with pro-meat opinions who believes that breeding is unrelated to climate issues.

References

  1. Galárraga, L.A., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.M.: AMIE: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 13–17 May 2013, pp. 413–422 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo, R., Cheng, L., Li, J., Hahn, P.R., Liu, H.: A survey of learning causality with data: problems and methods. ACM Comput. Surv. 53(4), 1–36 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Munch, M., Dibie, J., Wuillemin, P., Manfredotti, C.E.: Towards interactive causal relation discovery driven by an ontology. In: International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ortona, S., Meduri, V.V., Papotti, P.: RuDiK: rule discovery in knowledge bases. Proc. VLDB Endow. 11, 1946–1949 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ras, Z.W., Wieczorkowska, A.: Action-rules: how to increase profit of a company. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, PKDD 2000, pp. 587–592 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rasouli, P., Yu, I.C.: Care: coherent actionable recourse based on sound counterfactual explanations (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08197

  7. Rubin, D.: Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. B 66(5), 688–701 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simonne, L., Pernelle, N., Saïs, F., Thomopoulos, R.: Differential causal rules mining in knowledge graphs. In: Proceedings of the 11th on Knowledge Capture Conference, K-CAP 2021, New York, NY, USA, pp. 105–112 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sýkora, L., Kliegr, T.: Action rules: counterfactual explanations in Python. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2644, pp. 28–41 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomopoulos, R., Salliou, N., Taillandier, P., Tonda, A.: Consumers’ motivations towards environment-friendly dietary changes: an assessment of trends related to the consumption of animal products. In: Leal Filho, W., Djekic, I., Smetana, S., Kovaleva, M. (eds.) Handbook of Climate Change Across the Food Supply Chain. Climate Change Management, pp. 305–319. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87934-1_17

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Simonne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Simonne, L., Pernelle, N., Saïs, F. (2022). Counter Effect Rules Mining in Knowledge Graphs. In: Corcho, O., Hollink, L., Kutz, O., Troquard, N., Ekaputra, F.J. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13514. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17104-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17105-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics