[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Influence of Forecast Error and Forecast Bias on Safety Stock on a MRP System with Rolling Horizon Forecast Updates

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research Proceedings 2021 (OR 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Operations Research ((LNOR))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 772 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of rolling horizon forecast updates on a production system relying on material requirements planning (MRP). The underlying demand model is the MMFE (martingale model of forecast evolution) model extended by forecast biases revealed certain periods before delivery, i.e. information quality is not strictly increasing as assumed in MMFE. Simulation is applied to model the MRP planning method and the shop floor behavior of a two stage production system including a two level bill-of-materials with 8 finished goods and 4 semi-finished materials. Several scenarios on the demand model parameterization are tested and a finite solution space for the MRP planning parameter safety stock is enumerated to minimize overall costs. In this numerical study, preliminary results to identify the influence of forecast uncertainty on MRP planning parameter safety stock are identified when rolling horizon forecast updates occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsay, A.A., Lovejoy, W.S.: Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. MSOM 1(2), 89–111 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1.2.89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Silver, E.A., Pyke, D.F., Peterson, R.: Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heath, D.C., Jackson, P.L.: Modeling the evolution of demand forecasts ITH application to safety stock analysis in production/distribution systems. IIE Trans. 26(3), 17–30 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179408966604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norouzi, A., Uzsoy, R.: Modeling the evolution of dependency between demands, with application to inventory planning. IIE Trans. 46(1), 55–66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2013.803637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, L., Lee, H.L.: Information sharing and order variability control under a generalized demand model. Manage. Sci. 55(5), 781–797 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dolgui, A., Prodhon, C.: Supply planning under uncertainties in MRP environments: a state of the art. Ann. Rev. Control 31(2), 269–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thevenin, S., Adulyasak, Y., Cordeau, J.-F.: Material requirements planning under demand uncertainty using stochastic optimization. Prod. Oper. Manage. 30(2), 475–493 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Altendorfer, K.: Effect of limited capacity on optimal planning parameters for a multi-item production system with setup times and advance demand information. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(6), 1892–1913 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1511925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fildes, R., Kingsman, B.: Incorporating demand uncertainty and forecast error in supply chain planning models. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(3), 483–500 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, X., Lai, F., Lee, T.S.: Evaluation of safety stock methods in multilevel material requirements planning (MRP) systems. Prod. Plann. Control 12(8), 794–803 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/095372800110052511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Enns, S.T.: MRP performance effects due to lot size and planned lead time settings. Int. J. Prod. Res. 39(3), 461–480 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540010002810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopp, W.J., Spearman, M.L.: Factory Physics, 3rd edn. Waveland Press, Long Grove (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work described in this paper was done within the Produktion der Zukunft Project (InnoFIT, #867471), funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Seiringer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Seiringer, W., Brockmann, F., Altendorfer, K., Felberbauer, T. (2022). Influence of Forecast Error and Forecast Bias on Safety Stock on a MRP System with Rolling Horizon Forecast Updates. In: Trautmann, N., Gnägi, M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2021. OR 2021. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08623-6_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics