Blockchain in a Nutshell

1. Back, A.: Hashcash-a denial of service counter-measure (2002). http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf

2. Back, A., Corallo, M., Dashjr, L., Friedenbach, M., Maxwell, G., Miller, A., Poelstra, A., Timón, J., Wuille, P.: Enabling blockchain innovations with pegged sidechains (2014). https://www.peercoin.net/whitepapers/peercoin-paper.pdf

3. Baird, L., Harmon, M., Madsen, P.: Hedera: A public hashgraph network and governing council (2020). https://hedera.com/hh_whitepaper_v2.1-20200815.pdf

4. Blum, M., Feldman, P., Micali, S.: Non-interactive zero-knowledge and its applications (extended abstract). In: J. Simon (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, May 2–4, 1988, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 103–112. ACM (1988). https://doi.org/10.1145/62212.62222

5. Burdges, J., Cevallos, A., Czaban, P., Habermeier, R., Hosseini, S., Lama, F., Alper, H.K., Luo, X., Shirazi, F., Stewart, A., Wood, G.: Overview of polkadot and its design considerations (2020). CoRR arXiv:2005.13456

6. Buterin, V.: Ethereum: a next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform (2014). https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper

7. Buterin, V.: An incomplete guide to rollups (2021). https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/01/05/rollup.html

8. Buterin, V.: Why sharding is great: demystifying the technical properties (2021). https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/04/07/sharding.html

9. Castro, M., Liskov, B.: Practical byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI’99, pp. 173–186. USENIX Association, USA (1999)

   Google Scholar 

10. Chen, J., Micali, S.: Algorand: A secure and efficient distributed ledger. Theor. Comput. Sci. 777, 155–183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.02.001

11. Chen, T., Lu, H., Kunpittaya, T., Luo, A.: A review of zk-snarks (2022)

    Google Scholar 

12. Damgård, I.: Commitment schemes and zero-knowledge protocols. In: I. Damgård (ed.) Lectures on Data Security, Modern Cryptology in Theory and Practice, Summer School, Aarhus, Denmark, July 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1561, pp. 63–86. Springer (1998). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48969-X_3

13. Deloitte: Deloitte’s 2020 global blockchain survey (2020). https://www2.deloitte.com/mt/en/pages/technology/articles/2020-global-blockchain-survey.html

14. Dwork, C., Naor, M.: Pricing via processing or combatting junk mail. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Cryptology Conference on Advances in Cryptology, CRYPTO’92, pp. 139–147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

15. Ethworks: Zero-knowledge blockchain scalability (2018). https://ethworks.io/assets/download/zero-knowledge-blockchain-scaling-ethworks.pdf

16. Eyal, I., Sirer, E.G.: Majority is not enough: bitcoin mining is vulnerable. Commun. ACM 61(7), 95–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3212998

17. Gilad, Y., Hemo, R., Micali, S., Vlachos, G., Zeldovich, N.: Algorand: scaling byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies. In: Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP’17. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 51–68. New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132747.3132757

18. Goodman, L.M.: Tezos: a self-amending crypto-ledger (white paper) (2014). https://tezos.com/whitepaper.pdf

19. Grunspan, C., Pérez-Marco, R.: The mathematics of Bitcoin (2020). CoRR arXiv:2003.00001

20. Hafid, A., Hafid, A.S., Samih, M.: Scaling blockchains: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 8, 125244–125262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007251

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Hankerson, D., Menezes, A.: Elliptic Curve Cryptography, pp. 397. Springer US, Boston, MA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

22. Herlihy, M.: Atomic cross-chain swaps. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC’18. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 245–254. New York, NY, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3212734.3212736

23. Iansiti, M., Lakhani, K.: The truth about blockchain. Harv. Bus. Rev. 95, 118–127 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

24. King, S., Nadal, S.: Ppcoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake (2012). https://www.peercoin.net/whitepapers/peercoin-paper.pdf

25. Koblitz, N.: Elliptic curve cryptosystems. Math. Comput. 48(177), 203–209 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

26. Konstantopoulos, G.: Plasma cash: towards more efficient plasma constructions (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1911.12095. arXiv:1911.12095

27. Kwon, J.: Tendermint: consensus without mining (2014). https://tendermint.com/static/docs/tendermint.pdf

28. Kwon, J., Buchman, E.: A network of distributed ledgers (2016). https://v1.cosmos.network/resources/whitepaper

29. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4(3), 382–401 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1145/357172.357176

30. Lan, R., Upadhyaya, G., Tse, S., Zamani, M.: Horizon: a gas-efficient, trustless bridge for cross-chain transactions (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2101.06000. arXiv:2101.06000

31. Lin, H.Y., Tzeng, W.G.: An efficient solution to the millionaires’ problem based on homomorphic encryption. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, ACNS’05, pp. 456–466. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

32. Maymounkov, P., Mazieres, D.: Kademlia: A peer-to-peer information system based on the xor metric. Peer-to-Peer Systems, pp. 53–65 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

33. Merkle, R.C.: A digital signature based on a conventional encryption function. CRYPTO’87, pp. 369–378. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

34. Miller, V.S.: Use of elliptic curves in cryptography. In: Williams, H.C. (ed.) Advances in Cryptology–CRYPTO’85 Proceedings, pp. 417–426. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1986)

    Google Scholar 

35. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

36. Nguyen, Q., Cronje, A., Kong, M., Lysenko, E., Guzev, A.: Lachesis: Scalable asynchronous bft on dag streams (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2108.01900. arXiv:2108.01900

37. Poon, J., Buterin, V.: Plasma: scalable autonomous smart contracts (2017). https://plasma.io/plasma.pdf

38. Poon, J., Dryja, T.: The Bitcoin lightning network: Scalable off-chain instant payments (2017). https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

39. PwC: Time for trust: The trillion-dollar reason to rethink blockchain pwc projected (2020). https://www.pwc.com/timefortrust

40. Rocket, T., Yin, M., Sekniqi, K., van Renesse, R., Sirer, E.G.: Scalable and probabilistic leaderless BFT consensus through metastability (2019). CoRR arXiv:1906.08936

41. Sguanci, C., Spatafora, R., Vergani, A.: Layer 2 blockchain scaling: a survey (2021). arXiv:2107.10881

42. Shi, E.: Foundations of distributed consensus and blockchains (book manuscript) (2020). https://www.distributedconsensus.net

43. Szabo, N.: The idea of smart contracts (1997). https://nakamotoinstitute.org/the-idea-of-smart-contracts

44. Wang, D., Zhou, J., Wang, A.: Loopring: A decentralized token exchange protocol (2018). https://loopring.org/resources/en_whitepaper.pdf

45. Wang, T., Zhao, C., Yang, Q., Zhang, S., Liew, S.C.: Ethna: Analyzing the underlying peer-to-peer network of ethereum blockchain. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 8(3), 2131–2146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2021.3078181

46. Wensley, J.H.: Sift: software implemented fault tolerance. In: Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I, AFIPS’72 (Fall, part I). Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 243–253. New York, NY, USA (1972). https://doi.org/10.1145/1479992.1480025

47. Wood, G.: Polkadot white paper (2016). https://polkadot.network/PolkaDotPaper.pdf

48. Yakovenko, A.: Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain v0.8.13 (2017). https://solana.com/solana-whitepaper.pdf

Download references