[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning for Extractive Legal Summarization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2021)

Abstract

Automatic summarization of legal texts is an important and still a challenging task since legal documents are often long and complicated with unusual structures and styles. Recent advances of deep models trained end-to-end with differentiable losses can well-summarize natural text, yet when applied to the legal domain, they show limited results. In this paper, we propose to use reinforcement learning to train current deep summarization models to improve their performance in the legal domain. To this end, we adopt proximal policy optimization methods and introduce novel reward functions that encourage the generation of candidate summaries satisfying both lexical and semantic criteria. We apply our method to training different summarization backbones and observe a consistent and significant performance gain across three public legal datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 87.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The parameter: -c 95 -m -r 1000 -n 2.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, P., et al.: A comparative study of summarization algorithms applied to legal case judgments. In: European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 413–428 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jain, D., Borah, M.D., Biswas, A.: Summarization of legal documents: where are we now and the way forward. Comput. Sci. Rev. 40, 100388 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Polsley, S., Jhunjhunwala, P., Huang, R.: Casesummarizer: a system for automated summarization of legal texts. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, The 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 258–262 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, Y.: Fine-tune BERT for extractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10318 (2019)

  5. Galgani, F., Compton, P., Hoffmann, A.: Combining different summarization techniques for legal text. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Hybrid Approaches to the Processing of Textual Data, pp. 115–123 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kornilova, A., Eidelman, V.: BillSum: a corpus for automatic summarization of US legislation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00523 (2019)

  7. Manor, L., Li, J.J.: Plain English summarization of contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00424 (2019)

  8. Narayan, S., Cohen, S.B., Lapata, M.: Ranking sentences for extractive summarization with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08636 (2018)

  9. Lin, C.-Y.: ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text Summarization Branches Out, pp. 74–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pasunuru, R., Bansal, M.: Multi-reward reinforced summarization with saliency and entailment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06451 (2018)

  11. Li, S., Lei, D., Qin, P., Wang, W.Y.: Deep reinforcement learning with distributional semantic rewards for abstractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00141 (2019)

  12. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 6000–6010 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)

  15. Kusner, M., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N., Weinberger, K.: From word embeddings to document distances. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 957–966 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Verma, S., Nidhi, V.: Extractive summarization using deep learning. Res. Comput. Sci. 147, 107–117 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasilyev, O., Dharnidharka, V., Bohannon, J.: Fill in the BLANC: human-free quality estimation of document summaries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09836 (2020)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duy-Hung Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, DH. et al. (2021). Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning for Extractive Legal Summarization. In: Mantoro, T., Lee, M., Ayu, M.A., Wong, K.W., Hidayanto, A.N. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1517. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92309-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92310-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics