Open Data from the Perspectives of Individual Actors of Political Communication

• Böhm, C., Naumann, F., Freitag, M., George, S., Höfler, N., Köppelmann, M., … & Schmidt, T. (2010, September). Linking open government data: What journalists wish they had known. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on semantic systems, pp. 1–4.

  Google Scholar 

• Boughzala, I., Janssen, M., & Assar, S. (2015). E-government 2.0: Back to reality, a 2.0 application to vet. In Case studies in e-Government 2.0 (pp. 1–14). Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Brajawidagda, U., & Chatfield, A. T. (2014). Roles of social media in open data environments: A case study of the 2014 Indonesian presidential election voting results.

  Google Scholar 

• Brunswicker, S., Majchrzak, A., Almirall, E., & Tee, R. (2018). Cocreating value from open data: From incentivizing developers to inducing cocreation in open data innovation ecosystems. World Scientific Book Chapters, 3, 141–162.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., & Russo, D. (2016, March). Big data quality: A roadmap for open data. In 2016 IEEE second international conference on big data computing service and applications (BigDataService) (pp. 210–215). IEEE.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciociola, C., & Reggi, L. (2015). A Scuola di OpenCoesione: From open data to civic engagement (p. 26). Open Data as Open Educational Resources.

  Google Scholar 

• Cogburn, D. L., & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1–2), 189–213.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2014). On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 10–17.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dogan, G., Taskin, Z., & Aydinoglu, A. U. (2021). Research data management in Turkey: A survey to build an effective national data repository. IFLA Journal, 47(1), 51–64.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ferro, E., Caroleo, B., Leo, M., Osella, M., & Pautasso, E. (2013). The role of ICT in smart cities governance. In Proceedings of 13th international conference for E-democracy and open government (pp. 133–145). Donau-Universität Krems.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferro, E., & Osella, M. (2013, April). Eight business model archetypes for PSI re-use. In Open Data on the Web Workshop. Google Campus, Shoreditch, London. https://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/odw13_submission_27.pdf

• Fusi, F., & Feeney, M. K. (2020). Data sharing in small and medium US cities: The role of community characteristics. Public Administration, 98(4), 922–940.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gonzálvez-Gallego, N., & Nieto-Torrejón, L. (2021). Can open data increase younger generations’ trust in democratic institutions? A study in the European Union. Plos one, 16(1), e0244994.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gray, J., Chambers, L., & Bounegru, L. (2012). The data journalism handbook: How journalists can use data to improve the news. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Gün, A., Pak, B., & Demir, Y. (2021). Responding to the urban transformation challenges in Turkey: A participatory design model for Istanbul. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(1), 32–55.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 455–461.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jalali, J., Mohammad, S., & Park, H. W. (2017). Conversations about open data on Twitter. International Journal of Contents, 13(1).

  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, M., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2014). Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users. Social Science Computer Review, 32(5), 694–711.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Joseph, B. K. (2019). Blockchain for open data – Exploring conceptual underpinnings and practice. In Governance models for creating public value in open data initiatives (pp. 161–175). Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 508–513.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2015a). Understanding systems of e-Government: e-Federalism and e-Centralism in the United States and Kazakhstan. Lexington Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2015b). E-Government in the United States: The federal model of implementation. In Understanding systems of e-Government (pp. 27–43). Rowman & Littlefield.

  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2016). E-government in Kazakhstan: A case study of multidimensional phenomena. Routledge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2018). Open data and its intermediaries: A cross-country perspective on participatory movement among independent developers. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(3), 327–342.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2019a). Open data politics: A case study on Estonia and Kazakhstan. Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2019b). Open data and e-government–related or competing ecosystems: A paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia. Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 552–578.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2019c). Open data politics in Estonia: Advancing open Government in the context of Ubiquitous digital state. In Open Data Politics (pp. 37–67). Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2019d). Open data politics in Kazakhstan: Understanding a tentative advance of civic engagement in a transitional society. In Open data politics (pp. 69–98). Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2020). Open data and its peers: Understanding promising harbingers from Nordic Europe. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(5), 765–785.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2021a). Blockchain and e-government innovation: Automation of public information processes. Information Systems, 103, 101862.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kassen, M. (2021b). Understanding decentralized civic engagement: Focus on peer-to-peer and blockchain-driven perspectives on e-participation. Technology in Society, 66, 101650.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Lakomaa, E., & Kallberg, J. (2013). Open data as a foundation for innovation: The enabling effect of free public sector information for entrepreneurs. IEEE Access, 1, 558–563.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magalhaes, G., & Roseira, C. (2017). Open government data and the private sector: An empirical view on business models and value creation. Government Information Quarterly, 37, 101248.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., & Strover, S. (2013, October). Open government data intermediaries: A terminology framework. In proceedings of the 7th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, pp. 330–333.

  Google Scholar 

• Meijer, A., & Potjer, S. (2018). Citizen-generated open data: An explorative analysis of 25 cases. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 613–621.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meijer, R., Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2014). Reconciling contradictions of open data regarding transparency, privacy, security and trust. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 32–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Hara, K. (2012, June). Transparency, open data and trust in government: Shaping the infosphere. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference, pp. 223–232.

  Google Scholar 

• Ojo, A., Curry, E., & Zeleti, F. A. (2015, January). A tale of open data innovations in five smart cities. In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2326–2335). IEEE.

  Google Scholar 

• Ojo, A., & Janssen, M. (2013, June). Aligning core stakeholders’ perspectives and issues in the open government data community. In Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on digital government research, pp. 293–294.

  Google Scholar 

• Ojo, A., & Millard, J. (Eds.). (2017). Government 3.0 – Next generation government technology infrastructure and services: Roadmaps. Enabling Technologies & Challenges (Vol. 32). Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Pantano, E., Priporas, C. V., Stylos, N., & Dennis, C. (2019). Facilitating tourists’ decision making through open data analyses: A novel recommender system. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 323–331.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213–229.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puussaar, A., Johnson, I. G., Montague, K., James, P., & Wright, P. (2018). Making open data work for civic advocacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), pp. 1–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Ricker, B., Cinnamon, J., & Dierwechter, Y. (2020). When open data and data activism meet: An analysis of civic participation in Cape Town, South Africa. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien.

  Google Scholar 

• Sein, M. K. (2011). The “I” between G and C: E-government intermediaries in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 48(1), 1–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sieber, R. E., & Johnson, P. A. (2015). Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 308–315.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stoneman, J. (2015). Does open data need journalism? University of Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Susha, I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019, January). A collaborative governance approach to partnerships addressing public problems with private data. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Tinholt, D. (2013). The open data economy: Unlocking economic value by opening government and public data. Capgemini Consulting.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosloo, S., & Van Belle, J. P. (2005, August). E-government and the E-readiness of Non-Profit Organisations in the Western Cape. In The 2nd annual conference of the Community Informatics Research Network (CIRN), South Africa, pp. 24–26.

  Google Scholar 

• Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Kapoor, K., Sivarajah, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2017). Open data and its usability: An empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 285–300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weerakkody, V., Kapoor, K., Balta, M. E., Irani, Z., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2017). Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data. Production Planning & Control, 28(11–12), 891–905.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). E-government and bureaucracy: Toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379–404.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yavuz, M. F., & Saiti, B. (2020). Eliminating trust issues in Islamic interbank monetary system by Blockchain technology. In Impact of Financial Technology (FinTech) on Islamic finance and financial stability (pp. 1–11). IGI Global.

  Google Scholar 

• Yli-Huumo, J., Päivärinta, T., Rinne, J., & Smolander, K. (2018). Suomi.fi – Towards government 3.0 with a national service platform. In International conference on electronic government (pp. 3–14). Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references