Event-Based Looming Objects Detection

1. Barranco, F., Fermüller, C., Ros, E.: Real-time clustering and multi-target tracking using event-based sensors. CoRR abs/1807.02851 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02851

2. Bradski, G.: The OpenCV library. Dr. Dobb’s J. Softw. Tools (2000). https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/CiteOpenCV

3. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience (2000)

   Google Scholar 

4. Fülöp, T., Zarándy, A.: Bio-inspired looming object detector algorithm on the eye-RIS focal plane-processor system. In: 2010 12th International Workshop on Cellular Nanoscale Networks and Their Applications (CNNA), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2010)

   Google Scholar 

5. Fülöp, T., Zarándy, A.: Bio-inspired looming direction detection method. In: 2012 13th International Workshop on Cellular Nanoscale Networks and Their Applications (CNNA), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2012)

   Google Scholar 

6. Gallego, G., et al.: Event-based vision: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3008413

7. Gil-Jiménez, P., Gómez-Moreno, H., López-Sastre, R., Bermejillo-Martín-Romo, A.: Estimating the focus of expansion in a video sequence using the trajectories of interest points. Image Vis. Comput. 50, 14–26 (2016)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Goutte, C., Toft, P., Rostrup, E., Nielsen, F., Hansen, L.: On clustering FMRI time series. NeuroImage 9(3), 298–310 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0391. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811998903913

9. Hartigan, J., Wong, M.: Algorithm as 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Appl. Stat.) 28(1), 100–108 (1979)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

10. Ketchen, D., Shook, C.: The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(6), 441–458 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Li, X., Wang, K., Wang, W., Li, Y.: A multiple object tracking method using Kalman filter. In: The 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, pp. 1862–1866, June 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2010.5512258

12. Lichtsteiner, P., Posch, C., Delbruck, T.: A \(128 \times 128\)\(120\)\(db\)\(15\)\(\mu \)s latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensor. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 43(2), 566–576 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Linares-Barranco, A., Gómez-Rodríguez, F., Villanueva, V., Longinotti, L., Delbrück, T.: A USB3.0 FPGA event-based filtering and tracking framework for dynamic vision sensors. In: 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 2417–2420, May 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2015.7169172

14. Pantilie, C., Nedevschi, S.: Real-time obstacle detection in complex scenarios using dense stereo vision and optical flow. In: 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 439–444. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

15. Park, S.S., Sowmya, A.: Autonomous robot navigation by active visual motion analysis and understanding. In: Proceedings of IAPR Workshop on Machine Vision Applications (1998)

    Google Scholar 

16. Powers, D.: Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation (2011)

    Google Scholar 

17. Ridwan, I., Cheng, H.: An event-based optical flow algorithm for dynamic vision sensors. In: Karray, F., Campilho, A., Cheriet, F. (eds.) ICIAR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10317, pp. 182–189. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59876-5_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

18. Rind, F., Simmons, P.: Seeing what is coming: building collision-sensitive neurones. Trends Neurosci. 22(5), 215–220 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Satopaa, V., Albrecht, J., Irwin, D., Raghavan, B.: Finding a “kneedle” in a haystack: detecting knee points in system behavior. In: 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, pp. 166–171, June 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2011.20

20. Subbarao, M.: Bounds on time-to-collision and rotational component from first-order derivatives of image flow. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 50(3), 329–341 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Thorndike, R.: Who belongs in the family? Psychometrika 18(4), 267–276 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references