Abstract
The paper studies the variation of the conflict measure with blurring of focal elements and discounting of the masses of the belief functions in the framework of the theory of evidence. Blurring of focal elements is modeled using fuzzy sets. Such properties of the conflict measure as the robustness to transformations of the bodies of evidence, the monotonicity and the direction of change are investigated. A numerical example of calculating the measure of conflict, taking into account the blurring of focal elements and discounting of masses for the selection of bodies of evidence for the aggregation of analysts’ forecasts regarding the oil price, is considered.
The financial support from the Government of the Russian Federation within the framework of the implementation of the 5–100 Programme Roadmap of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bronevich, A., Lepskiy, A., Penikas, H.: The application of conflict measure to estimating incoherence of analyst’s forecasts about the cost of shares of Russian companies. Procedia Comput. Sci. 55, 1113–1122 (2015)
Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)
Hodari, D.: Oil prices seen remaining subdued into 2021. The Wall Street Journal, 28 November 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-prices-seen-remaining-subdued-into-2021-11606490833. Accessed 1 Mar 2021
Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall PTR, Hoboken (1995)
Kruse, R., Schwecke, E.: Specialization: a new concept for uncertainty handling with belief functions. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 18(1), 49–60 (1990)
Lepskiy, A.: About relation between the measure of conflict and decreasing of ignorance in theory of evidence. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, pp. 355–362. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam (2013)
Lepskiy, A.: General schemes of combining rules and the quality characteristics of combining. In: Cuzzolin, F. (ed.) BELIEF 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8764, pp. 29–38. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11191-9_4
Lepskiy, A.: The qualitative characteristics of combining evidence with discounting. In: Ferraro, M.B., et al. (eds.) Soft Methods for Data Science. AISC, vol. 456, pp. 311–318. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_39
Lepskiy, A.: On the conflict measures agreed with the combining rules. In: Destercke, S., Denoeux, T., Cuzzolin, F., Martin, A. (eds.) BELIEF 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11069, pp. 172–180. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99383-6_22
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
Smets, P.: Belief functions on real numbers. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 40(3), 181–223 (2005)
Straszecka, E.: An interpretation of focal elements as fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18, 821–835 (2003)
Yen, J.: Generalizing the Dempster-Shafer theory to fuzzy sets. In: Yager, R.R., Liu, L. (eds.) Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 219, pp. 529–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_21
Zhang, L.: Representation, independence and combination of evidence in the Dempster-Shafer theory. In: Yager, R.R., et al. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 51–69. Wiley, New York (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lepskiy, A. (2021). Conflict Measure of Belief Functions with Blurred Focal Elements on the Real Line. In: Denœux, T., Lefèvre, E., Liu, Z., Pichon, F. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12915. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88601-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88601-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88600-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88601-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)