Abstract
The Stroop effect is a delay in human response between congruent and incongruent stimuli, in which color names interfere with the ability to determine the color of the ink used to print those names. The results of the Stroop test used in our experiment were analyzed from the point of view of human cognitive load. 62 volunteers took part in a study conducted on the iMotions biometric platform in laboratory conditions. Data were collected using observations, Single Ease Question (SEQ) and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) self-report questionnaires, and galvanic skin response (GSR) biosensor. In total, based on the collected data, 18 performance, subjective and psychophysiological metrics were calculated to measure cognitive load based on Stroop test. Non-parametric tests of statistical significance of differences between individual metrics were performed for the Stroop tasks for the easy and hard level of difficulty. The Spearman’s rank correlation between individual metrics was also analysed. The conducted research allowed to make many interesting observations and showed the usefulness of most measures in the analysis of the cognitive load associated with the Stroop effect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Farnsworth, B.: The Stroop effect – how it works and why. https://imotions.com/blog/the-stroop-effect/ (2019)
Young, M.S., Brookhuis, K.A., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, P.A.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58(1), 1–17 (2015)
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 12(1), 257–285 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn. Instr. 4(4), 295–312 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Paas, F.G.W.C.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10(3), 251–296 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 55. Elsevier Inc. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Pejović, V., Gjoreski, M., Anderson, C., David, K., Luštrek, M.: Toward cognitive load inference for attention management in ubiquitous systems. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 19(2), 35–45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2020.2968909
Barrouillet, P., Camos, V.: Working Memory: Loss and Reconstruction. Psychology Press (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755854
Chen, F., Zhou, J. (eds.): Robust Multimodal Cognitive Load Measurement. HIS, Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31700-7
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 12(2), 257–285 (1988)
Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J., Paas, F.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 31(2), 261–292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Geary, D.C.: Educating the evolved mind: conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In: Carlson, J.S., Levin, J.R. (eds.) Educating the Evolved Mind: Conceptual Foundations for an Evolutionary Educational Psychology Information Age Charlotte. NC, 1, p. 99 (2007)
Geary, D.C.: An evolutionarily informed education science. Educ. Psychol. 43(4), 179–195 (2008)
Geary, D.C.: Evolutionary educational psychology. APA Educational Psychology Handbook, vol. 1: Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues, pp. 597–621. American Psychological Association (2012)
Geary, D., Berch, D.: Evolution and children’s cognitive and academic development. In: Geary, D.C., Berch, D.B. (eds.) Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education. EP, pp. 217–249. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_9
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, J.: From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 13(2), 213–233 (2018)
Tricot, A., Sweller, J.: Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 26(2), 265–283 (2014)
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E.: Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problembased, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ. Psychol. 41(2), 75–86 (2006)
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P.A., Clark, R.E.: Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: a reply to commentaries. Educ. Psychol. 42(2), 115–121 (2007)
Jia, L., Kalyuga, S., Sweller, J.: Altering element Interactivity and variability in example‐practice sequences to enhance learning to write Chinese characters. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 34(4), 837–843 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3668
Roussel, S., Joulia, D., Tricot, A., Sweller, J.: Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: a cognitive load theory approach. Learn. Instr. 52, 69–79 (2017)
Renaud, P., Blondin, J.P.: The stress of Stroop performance: physiological and emotional responses to color-word interference, task pacing, and pacing speed. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 27(2), 87–97 (1997)
Petkar, H.C: Effects of working memory demand on performance and mental stress during the Stroop task. Masters Thesis, Concordia University (2011)
Williams, J.M.G., Mathews, A., MacLeod, C.: The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol. Bull. 120(1), 3–24 (1996)
Wagner, P., Wagner, T.: The Galvanic Skin Response GSR Investigation Cheating. http://www.rsu.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/06/TheGalvanicSkinResponseGSRInvestigationCheating.pdf (2013). Retrieved 8 Dec 2020
Braithwaite, J., Watson, D., Jones, R., Rowe, M.: A Guide for Analysing Electrodermal Activity (EDA) Skin Conductance Responses (SCRs) for Psychological Experiments. Technical Report, 2nd version. University of Birmingham, UK (2015)
Nourbakhsh, N., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Calvo, R.A.: Using galvanic skin response for cognitive load measurement in arithmetic and reading tasks. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2012, pp. 420–423 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414602
Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., Chen, F.: Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. In: CHI 2007 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2651–2656 (2007)
Yoshihiro, S., Takumi, Y., Koji, S., Akinori, H., Koichi, I., Tetsuo, K.: Use of frequency domain analysis of skin conductance for evaluation of mental workload. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 27(4), 173–177 (2008)
O’Donnell, R.D., Eggemeier, F.T.: Workload assessment methodology. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Vol. 2. Cognitive Processes and Performance. K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J.P. Thomas (1986)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52(3), 139–183 (1988)
Hart, S.G.: NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting on Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 904–908 (2006)
Gibson, A., et al.: Assessing usability testing for people living with dementia. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, October, 25–31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3051488.3051492
GSR R-Notebooks: Processing in iMotions and algorithms used (Latest Version). https://help.imotions.com/hc/en-us/articles/360010312220-GSR-R-Notebooks-Processing-in-iMotions-and-algorithms-used-Latest-Version (2021). Last accessed 6 Jan 2021
Benedek, M., Kaernbach, C.: A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. J. Neurosci. Methods 190(1), 80–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028
R Notebooks (EDA): GSR Epoching, https://help.imotions.com/hc/en-us/articles/360013685940-R-Notebooks-EDA-GSR-Epoching (2021). Last accessed 6 Jan 2021
Gautam, A., Simoes-Capela, N., Schiavone, G., Acharyya, A., de Raedt, W., Van Hoof, C.: A data driven empirical iterative algorithm for GSR signal pre-processing. In: 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 1162–1166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23919/eusipco.2018.8553191
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zihisire Muke, P., Piwowarczyk, M., Telec, Z., Trawiński, B., Maharani, P.A., Bresso, P. (2021). Impact of the Stroop Effect on Cognitive Load Using Subjective and Psychophysiological Measures. In: Nguyen, N.T., Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88081-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88081-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88080-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88081-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)