[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

A Novel Method for Automated Suggestion of Similar Software Incidents Using 2-Stage Filtering: Findings on Primary Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Document Analysis and Recognition – ICDAR 2021 (ICDAR 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 12822))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Advancements in software technology have resulted in a sharp increase in the complexity of software with an equally increasing number of bugs reported every day. Some of these bugs have a high severity and can often lead to significant business impacts. Thus, they need to be resolved by the developers at the earliest. Many of these reports are similar to the bug reports that were reported and resolved in the past. By suggesting similar incidents, the developers can refer to the troubleshooting information, thus effectively reducing the TTM (Time to Mitigate) of the software bugs. The developers also spend a significant amount of time and effort in triaging the bugs into their respective areas. Previous studies have mainly relied on unsupervised learning techniques for the detection of duplicate reports and ignored some key aspects of the bug reports. We conducted comprehensive research on real bugs reported for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Application Software. Our research presents a novel two-phase approach for suggesting similar incidents. The first phase called Binning involves the creation of a labelled dataset for employing a supervised learning algorithm for triaging the software incidents into multiple categories. Thus, the first phase also presents a solution for automating the process of triaging the incidents in addition to the first stage of filtering. The second phase introduces the use of error execution information and acknowledgment information for the calculation of similarity scores which has largely been ignored in the previous studies. The evaluation results show that the precision rate of our proposed approach reaches up to 95.8% while the model achieves recall rates of 67%–93.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jalbert, N., Weimer, W.: Automated duplicate detection for bug tracking systems, In: IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks With FTCS and DCC (DSN), Anchorage, AK, pp. 52–61 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2008.4630070

  2. Wang, X., Zhang, L., Xie, T., Anvik, J., Sun, J.: An approach to detecting duplicate bug reports using natural language and execution information. In: ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, Leipzig, pp. 461–470 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368151

  3. Anvik, J., Hiew, L., Murphy, G.C.: Coping with an open bug repository. In: Proceedings of the OOPSLA workshop on Eclipse technology eXchange, New York, NY, USA, pp. 35–39. Association for Computing Machinery (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1117696.1117704

  4. Sureka, A., Jalote, P.: Detecting duplicate bug report using character N-gram-based features. In: Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Sydney, NSW, pp. 366–374 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2010.49

  5. Zhang, T., Leo, B.: A novel technique for duplicate detection and classification of bug reports. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E97-D, 1756–1768 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.E97.D.1756

  6. Nguyen, A.T., Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, T.N., Lo, D., Sun, C.: Duplicate bug report detection with a combination of information retrieval and topic modeling. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Essen, pp. 70-79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2351676.2351687

  7. Zou, J., Xu, L., Yang, M., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Hirokawa, S.: Automated duplicate bug report detection using multi-factor analysis. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E99.D, 1762–1775 (2065). https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2016EDP7052

  8. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of Workshop at ICLR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, J., Lan, M., Tian, J.F.: ECNU: using traditional similarity measurements and word embedding for semantic textual similarity estimation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), p. 117 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chawla, N.B., Hall, K., Kegelmeyer, L.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 16, 321–357 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953

  11. Sainin, M.S., Alfred, R.: A direct ensemble classifier for imbalanced multiclass learning. In: 4th Conference on Data Mining and Optimization (DMO), Langkawi, pp. 59–66 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/DMO.2012.6329799

  12. Drucker, H., Cortes, C.: Boosting decision trees. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 8, pp. 479–485 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Agrawal, B., Mishra, M., Parashar, V. (2021). A Novel Method for Automated Suggestion of Similar Software Incidents Using 2-Stage Filtering: Findings on Primary Data. In: Lladós, J., Lopresti, D., Uchida, S. (eds) Document Analysis and Recognition – ICDAR 2021. ICDAR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12822. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86331-9_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86331-9_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86330-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86331-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics