Abstract
With the introduction of automation, vehicles have become increasingly complicated and difficult for users to understand. Users’ understanding of Automated Vehicles (AVs) is a key aspect for safe and successful implementation of AVs. However, more research is needed into how users understand AVs based on actual use experience. In this paper, users’ understanding of AVs is explored by investigating how they refer to and describe an AV, during and after initial usage. 18 participants experienced a seemingly fully automated vehicle, being driven with two distinctly different driving styles on a test course. The findings show that the participants had specific preconceptions of what they regarded as machine-like versus human-like driving characteristics of the AV. The participants also referred to the AV with gender pronouns and used human similes to describe the different driving styles. The different driving styles evoked different associations that influenced the participants’ perceptions of AV behaviour as a result of individual preconceptions and previous experiences. The results imply that the participants initially used a human-like mental model of the AV. However, further investigations are necessary into users’ initial comprehension of AVs, to better understand how they will experience and interact with future AVs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rajaonah, B., Anceaux, F., Vienne, F.: Trust and the use of adaptive cruise control: a study of a cut-in situation. Cogn. Technol. Work. 8(2), 146–155 (2006)
Seppelt, B.D., Lee, J.D.: Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 65(3), 192–205 (2007)
Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse. Abuse. Human Factors 39(2), 230–253 (1997)
Seppelt, B.D., Lee, J.D.: Keeping the driver in the loop: dynamic feedback to support appropriate use of imperfect vehicle control automation. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 125, 66–80 (2019)
Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J.D., Boyle, L.N.: Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cogn. Technol. Work 14(1), 39–49 (2012)
Khastgir, S., Birrell, S., Dhadyalla, G., Jennings, P.: Effect of knowledge of automation capability on trust and workload in an automated vehicle: a driving simulator study. In: Stanton, N. (ed.) AHFE 2018. AISC, vol. 786, pp. 410–420. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_37
Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 18, 47–57 (2013)
Nees, M.A.: Acceptance of self-driving cars: an examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self-driving car acceptance scale. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications Sage CA, Los Angeles, CA (2016)
Ekman, F., Johansson, M., Bligård, L.-O., Karlsson, M., Strömberg, H.: Exploring automated vehicle driving styles as a source of trust information. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 65, 268–279 (2019)
Kauffmann, N., Naujoks, F., Winkler, F., Kunde, W.: Learning the “Language” of Road Users - How Shall a Self-driving Car Convey Its Intention to Cooperate to Other Human Drivers? Springer, Cham (2018)
Oliveira, L., Proctor, K., Burns, C.G., Birrell, S.: Driving style: how should an automated vehicle behave? Information 10(6), 219 (2019)
Charters, E.: The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Edu. J. 12(2) (2003)
Purington, A., Taft, J.G., Sannon, S., Bazarova, N.N., Taylor, S.H.: Alexa is my new BFF: social roles, user satisfaction, and personification of the amazon echo. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2017)
Lopatovska, I., Williams, H.: Personification of the Amazon Alexa: BFF or a mindless companion. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval, pp. 265–268, ACM, New Brunswick (2018)
Cooke, S.F.: Are Robots Animate or Inanimate? Children's pronoun use provides insight to categorization challenge. In: 2018 University of Montana Conference on Undergraduate Research (2018)
Epley, N.: A mind like mine: the exceptionally ordinary underpinnings of anthropomorphism. J. Assoc. Consum. Res. 3(4), 591–598 (2018)
Aggarwal, P., McGill, A.L.: Is that car smiling at me? schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. J. Consum. Res. 34(4), 468–479 (2007)
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114(4), 864–886 (2007)
Airenti, G.: The development of anthropomorphism in interaction: intersubjectivity, imagination, and theory of mind. Front. Psychol. 9(2136) (2018)
Waytz, A., Heafner, J., Epley, N.: The mind in the machine: anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 113–117 (2014)
Raue, M., D’Ambrosio, L.A., Ward, C., Lee, C., Jacquillat, C., Coughlin, J.F.: The influence of feelings while driving regular cars on the perception and acceptance of self-driving cars. Risk Anal. 39(2), 358–374 (2019)
Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46(1), 50–80 (2004)
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Rouse, W.B., Morris, N.M.: On looking into the black-box - prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychol. Bull. 100(3), 349–363 (1986)
Gentner, D., Gentner, D.R.: Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity. In: Gentner, D.S, Albert L. (eds.) Mental Models, pp. 99–127, Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1983)
Staggers, N., Norcio, A.F.: Mental models: concepts for human-computer interaction research. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38(4), 587–605 (1993)
Cool, C., Park, S., Belkin, N., Koenemann, J., Ng, B.K.: Information seeking behavior in new searching environments. In: Royal School of Librarianship (1996)
d’Apollonia, S.T., Charles, E.S., Boyd, G.M.: Acquisition of complex systemic thinking: mental models of evolution. Educ. Res. Eval. 10(4–6), 499–521 (2004)
Wolf, I.: The Interaction Between Humans and Autonomous agents. In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H. (eds.) Autonomous Driving, pp. 103–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Johansson, M., Ekman, F., Karlsson, M., Strömberg, H., Bligård, LO. (2021). Talking Automated Vehicles. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78357-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78358-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)