Abstract
Instability is the norm, and emergency management has gradually become the general situation of organizations. Due to the enterprise business systems are developed to handle certain business under a planned and controlled assumption, cannot solve the uncertain business. Instead, a large number of uncertain business mainly rely on people’s interactives which bring diverse perspectives and sharing knowledge to solve. This paper interprets the representation of shadow system under uncertainty and further analyzes one type of obstacle of human-system interaction based on empirical analysis. Finally, this paper designs a conceptual framework about the feedback and enabling between shadow system and legitimate system to solve this obstacle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, N., Lemoine, G.J.: What a difference a word makes: understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Bus. Horiz. 57, 311–317 (2014)
Millar, C.C.J.M., Groth, O., Mahon, J.F.: Management innovation in a VUCA world: challenges and recommendations. Calif. Manage Rev. 61(1), 5–14 (2018)
Taylor, F.W.: The Principle of Scientific Management. Harper Brothers, New York (1911)
Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., Yoo, Y.: Complexity and information systems research in the emerging digital world. MIS Q. 44(1), 1–17 (2020)
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., Xue, Y.: Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q. 31(1), 59–87 (2007)
Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V.: Job characteristics and job satisfaction: understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Q. 34(1), 143–161 (2010)
Baran, B.E., Woznyj, H.M.: Managing VUCA: the human dynamics of agility. Organ. Dyn. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100787
Stacey, R.: Complexity and Creativity in organizations. Berrettkoehler, SanFrancisco, CA (1996)
Zimmermann, S., Rentrop, C., Felden, C.: Managing shadow IT instances–a method to control autonomous IT solutions in the business departments. In: Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Savannah (2014)
Rai, A., Constantinides, P., Sarker, S.: Editor’s comments: next-generation digital platforms: toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Q. 43(1), iii–ix (2019)
Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Pearson (2015)
Choo, C.W.: Towards an information model of organizations. Cana. J. Inform. Sci. 16(3), 32–62 (1991)
Jarrahi, M.H.: Artificial intelligence and the future of work: human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Bus. Horiz. 61(4), 577–586 (2018)
Aleksander, I.: Partners of humans: a realistic assessment of the role of robots in the foreseeable future. J. Inf. Technol. 32(1), 1–9 (2017)
Ackoff, R.L., Magidson, J., Addison, H.: Idealized Design. FT Press (2006)
Schoemaker, P.J.H., Sohvi, H., David, T.: Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61(1), 15–42 (2018)
Behrens, S., Sedera, W.: Why do shadow systems exist after an ERP implementation? lessons from a case study. In: The 8th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1712–1726. Shanghai, China (2004)
Behrens, S.: Shadow systems: the good, the bad and the ugly. Commun. ACM 52(2), 124–129 (2009)
Jones, D., Behrens, S., Jamieson, K., Tansley, E.: The rise and fall of a shadow system: lessons for enterprise system implementation. ACIS (2004)
Huber, M., Zimmermann, S., Rentrop, C., Felden, C.: The influence of shadow IT systems on enterprise architecture management concerns. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds.) EMCIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 299, pp. 461–477. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_37
Panko, R.R.: Spreadsheets and Sarbanes-Oxley: regulations, risks, and control frameworks. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 647–676 (2006)
Silic M, Back.: A shadow IT – a view from behind the curtain. Comput. Secur. 45, 274–283 (2014)
Brugnach, M., Pahl-Wostl, C., Lindenschmidt, K.E., Janssen, J., Gaber, N.N.: Complexity and uncertainty: rethinking the modelling activity. Dev. Integr. Environ. Asses. 3(08), 49–68 (2008)
Clark, A.: Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)
Beatty, R.C., Williams, C.D.: ERP ii: best practices for successfully implementing an ERP upgrade. Commun. ACM 49(3), 105–109 (2006)
Acknowledgments
Funding for this research was provided by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021YJS050)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liang, Q., Gou, J. (2021). A Conceptual Framework of Human-System Interaction Under Uncertainty-Based on Shadow System Perspective. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Ferreira, P., Brito, G. (eds) Technological Innovation for Applied AI Systems. DoCEIS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78287-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78288-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)