[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Mixed Reality Interface for Load Application in Finite Element Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12774))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2749 Accesses

Abstract

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is an integral process in manufacturing design, providing assurance of quality and structural integrity of a manufactured item. FEA involves conducting rigorous stress simulations on a designed model to study its structural behaviour when under specific loading scenarios. Current FEA tools involve viewing and manipulating the 3D model displayed on a monitor screen. A Mixed Reality (MR) user interface allowing for direct manipulation and specification of loading scenarios on a designed model was developed, thus enabling design engineers to find new ways of interacting and visualising FEA results for analysis and thus reducing unnecessary prototyping costs. Three gesture interfaces were developed to allow application of load parameters on a surface of a model, namely: Point-Apply, Point-Hold, and Point-Drag. A pilot evaluation was conducted to study the suitability of each as an interface designed for engineers. Results suggest that Point-Hold is empirically the most usable interface compared to the other interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoperators Virt. Environ. 6(4), 355–385 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balk, S.A., Bertola, M.A., Inman, V.W.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: twenty years later (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 24(6), 574–594 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke, J.: System Usability Scale (SUS): A Quick-and-Dirty Method of System Evaluation User Information, pp. 1–7. Digital Equipment Co. Ltd., Reading, UK (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmo, M.B., et al.: Augmented reality for support decision on solar radiation harnessing. In: 2016 23rd Portuguese Meeting on Computer Graphics and Interaction (EPCGI), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clothier, M., Bailey, M.: Augmented reality visualization tool for kings stormwater bridge. In: IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing (VIIP) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., Nakamura, J.: Flow. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, pp. 227–238. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_15

  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., Nakamura, J., et al.: Flow (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, I.S.: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, S., Nesbitt, K., Nalivaiko, E.: A systematic review of cybersickness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment, pp. 1–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandes, A.S., Feiner, S.K.: Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 201–210. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fiorentino, M., Monno, G., Uva, A.: Interactive “touch and see” fem simulation using augmented reality. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 25(6), 1124–1128 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M.: Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, S.G.: Nasa-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50, pp. 904–908. Sage Publications, Sage, Los Angeles (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heuveline, V., Ritterbusch, S., Ronnas, S.: Augmented reality for urban simulation visualization. Prepr. Ser. Eng. Math. Comput. Lab 16 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, J., Ong, S., Nee, A.: Real-time finite element structural analysis in augmented reality. Adv. Eng. Softw. 87, 43–56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.04.014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965997815000733

  17. Huang, J., Ong, S., Nee, A.: Visualization and interaction of finite element analysis in augmented reality. Comput. Aided Des. 84, 1–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2016.10.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448516301300

  18. Issartel, P., Guéniat, F., Ammi, M.: Slicing techniques for handheld augmented reality. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 39–42. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson, S.A., Marsh, H.W.: Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18(1), 17–35 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kendon, A.: Some relationships between body motion and speech. Stud. Dyadic Commun. 7(177), 90 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kendon, A.: Language and gesture: unity or duality. In: Language and Gesture, vol. 2 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kendon, A.: Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(3), 203–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, M., Yi, S., Jung, D., Park, S., Seo, D.: Augmented-reality visualization of aerodynamics simulation in sustainable cloud computing. Sustainability 10(5), 1362 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, W., Nee, A., Ong, S.: A state-of-the-art review of augmented reality in engineering analysis and simulation. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 1(3), 17 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsutomo, S., Mitsufuji, K., Hiasa, Y., Noguchi, S.: Real time simulation method of magnetic field for visualization system with augmented reality technology. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49(5), 1665–1668 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., Kishino, F.: Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, vol. 2351 (January 1994). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321

  29. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., Kishino, F.: Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, vol. 2351, pp. 282–292. International Society for Optics and Photonics (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piumsomboon, T., Clark, A., Billinghurst, M., Cockburn, A.: User-defined gestures for augmented reality. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8118, pp. 282–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Regenbrecht, H., Baratoff, G., Wilke, W.: Augmented reality projects in the automotive and aerospace industries. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25(6), 48–56 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scherer, S., Wabner, M.: Advanced visualization for finite elements analysis in virtual reality environments. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 2(3), 169–173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-008-0044-6

  33. Speicher, M., Hall, B.D., Nebeling, M.: What is mixed reality? In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 537. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sutherland, C., Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., Sellens, R., Abolmaesumi, P., Mousavi, P.: An augmented reality haptic training simulator for spinal needle procedures. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(11), 3009–3018 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Szabó, B., Babuška, I.: Finite Element Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Valentini, P., Pezzuti, E.: Dynamic splines for interactive simulation of elastic beams in augmented reality. In: International Conference on Innovative Methods in Product Design, IMProVe 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vovk, A., Wild, F., Guest, W., Kuula, T.: Simulator sickness in augmented reality training using the Microsoft Hololens. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–9. Association for Computing Machinery (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173783

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeannie S. A. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Poh, E., Liong, K., Lee, J.S.A. (2021). Mixed Reality Interface for Load Application in Finite Element Analysis. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis . HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12774. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77625-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77626-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics