[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12788))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Parental mediation is a key factor that influences adolescents’ exposure to online risk. Yet, research on this topic has mostly been cross-sectional and correlative, not exploring whether the relationship between parental mediation and adolescent online risk exposure could be bi-directional, where teens’ risk exposure influences parenting practices. To address this gap, we conducted an eight week, repeated measures web-based diary study with 68 adolescents (aged 13–17) and their parents to examine the relationships between three parental mediation strategies (active mediation, monitoring, and restriction) and three adolescent online risk types (explicit content, sexual solicitations, and online harassment) teens reported encountering online. Overall, parents and teens had significantly different perceptions regarding parental mediation, which yielded some consistent and conflicting results. Parents and teens agreed that parental restriction significantly increased the week in which the teen encountered all three risk types, and active mediation increased during the week in which the teen encountered online harassment. Parents and teens also consistently reported that restriction significantly decreased the week after an online harassment incident. Overall, we found that parental mediation and teen online risk exposure were most often significantly correlated in the same week, suggesting parenting occurred ‘just-in-time,’ rather than parents and teens’ behaviors bi-directionally influencing one another significantly from week-to-week. Our findings provide new insights into parent-teen perspectives on parental mediation and highlight the bi-directional relationship of parental mediation and online risk. We offer recommendations to facilitate ‘just in time’ parenting and provide teens with the necessary support to help keep them safe online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livingstone, S., Smith, P.K.: Annual research review: harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 55, 635–654 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, M.: A Majority of Teens Have Experienced Some Form of Cyberbullying. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/09/27/a-majority-of-teens-have-experienced-some-form-of-cyberbullying/. Accessed 03 Oct 2019

  3. Yardi, S.A.: Social Media at the Boundaries: Supporting Parents in Managing Youth’s Social Media Use. ProQuest LLC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashktorab, Z., Vitak, J.: Designing cyberbullying mitigation and prevention solutions through participatory design with teenagers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 3895–3905. Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548

  5. Lee, S.-J.: Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: effective for what and for whom? New Media Soc. 15, 466–481 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Livingstone, S., Helsper, E.J.: Parental mediation of children’s internet use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media. 52, 581–599 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

  7. Eastin, M.S., Greenberg, B.S., Hofschire, L.: Parenting the internet. J. Commun. 56, 486–504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., Rots, I.: Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children. Comput. Educ. 55, 454–464 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, S.-J., Chae, Y.-G.: Balancing participation and risks in children’s internet use: the role of internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Networking. 15, 257–262 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendoza, K.: Surveying parental mediation: connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. J. Media Literacy Educ. 1, 3 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., Ólafsson, K.: The perspective of European children. 171 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lwin, M., Stanaland, A., Miyazaki, A.: Protecting children’s privacy online: how parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. J. Retail. 84, 205–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorbring, E., Lundin, L.: Mothers’ and fathers’ insights into teenagers’ use of the internet. New Media Soc. 14, 1181–1197 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Carroll, J., Rosson, M.B.: Grand challenges of researching adolescent online safety: a family systems approach. In: AMCIS 2013 Proceedings (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings, E.M., Bergman, K.N., Kuznicki, K.A.: Emerging methods for studying families as systems. In: McHale, S.M., Amato, P., Booth, A. (eds.) Emerging Methods in Family Research. pp. 95–108. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_6.

  16. Valkenburg, P.M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A.L., Marseille, N.M.: Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: Instructive mediation, restrictive mediation, and social coviewing. J Broadcast. Electron. Media. 43, 52–66 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghosh, A.K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Rosson, M.B., Xu, H., Carroll, J.M., Wisniewski, P.J.: A matter of control or safety?: Examining parental use of technical monitoring apps on teens’ mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, pp. 1–14. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173768

  18. Badillo-Urquiola, K., Chouhan, C., Chancellor, S., De Choudhary, M., Wisniewski, P.: Beyond parental control: designing adolescent online safety apps using value sensitive design. J. Adolesc. Res. 35, 147–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419884692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Erickson, L.B., Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., Perkins, D.F.: The boundaries between: parental involvement in a teen’s online world. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 1384–1403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghosh, A.K., Hughes, C.E., Wisniewski, P.J.: Circle of trust: a new approach to mobile online safety for families. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14. Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376747

  21. Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Parents just don’t understand: why teens don’t talk to parents about their online risk experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2017, pp. 523–540. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998236

  22. Cranor, L.F., Durity, A.L., Marsh, A., Ur, B.: Parents’ and teens’ perspectives on privacy in a technology-filled world. In: Presented at the 10th Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2014) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., Ólafsson, K.: Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. https://www.eukidsonline.net/. Accessed 02 Feb 2021

  24. Yardi, S., Bruckman, A.: Social and technical challenges in parenting teens’ social media use. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 3237–3246. Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979422

  25. Blackwell, L., Gardiner, E., Schoenebeck, S.: Managing expectations: technology tensions among parents and teens. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2016, pp. 1388–1399. ACM Press, San Francisco, California, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819928

  26. Wisniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Preventative vs. Reactive: how parental mediation influences teens’ social media privacy behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. pp. 302–316. Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675293

  27. Hiniker, A., Schoenebeck, S.Y., Kientz, J.A.: Not at the dinner table: parents’ and children’s perspectives on family technology rules. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. pp. 1376–1389. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940

  28. Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J.: challenging online behaviors of youth: findings from a comparative analysis of young people in the United States and New Zealand. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghosh, A.K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Guha, S., LaViola Jr, J.J., Wisniewski, P.J.: Safety vs. Surveillance: what children have to say about mobile apps for parental control. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2018, pp. 1–14. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173698

  30. Schermerhorn, A.C., Cummings, E.M., Davies, P.T.: Children’s representations of multiple family relationships: organizational structure and development in early childhood. J. Family Psychol. 22, 89–101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kitzman-Ulrich, H., Wilson, D.K., St. George, S.M., Lawman, H., Segal, M., Fairchild, A.: The integration of a family systems approach for understanding youth obesity, physical activity, and dietary programs. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 13, 231–253 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0073-0

  32. Day, I.: A family systems approach to the understanding and treatment of internet gaming disorder. Family J. 25, 264–270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717711108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koning, I.M., Peeters, M., Finkenauer, C., van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M.: Bidirectional effects of Internet-specific parenting practices and compulsive social media and Internet game use. J. Behav. Addict. 7, 624–632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kenny, D.A., Harackiewicz, J.M.: Cross-lagged panel correlation: practice and promise. J. Appl. Psychol. 64(4), 372–379 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kenny, D.: Cross-lagged panel correlation: a test for spuriousness. Psychol. Bull. 82, 887–903 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Volonte, M., Anaraky, R.G., Knijnenburg, B., Duchowski, A.T., Babu, S.V.: Empirical evaluation of the interplay of emotion and visual attention in human-virtual human interaction. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019. pp. 1–9. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3343036.3343118

  37. Yao, M.Z., Zhong, Z.: Loneliness, social contacts and Internet addiction: a cross-lagged panel study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 164–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quartana, P.J., Wickwire, E.M., Klick, B., Grace, E., Smith, M.T.: Naturalistic changes in insomnia symptoms and pain in temporomandibular joint disorder: a cross-lagged panel analysis. PAIN®. 149, 325–331 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.029

  39. Aguinis, H., Boik, R.J., Pierce, C.A.: A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effects of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression. Organ. Res. Methods 4, 291–323 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810144001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fisher, R.J.: Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consum. Res. 20, 303–315 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1086/209351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bray, L., Carter, B., Sanders, C., Blake, L., Keegan, K.: Parent-to-parent peer support for parents of children with a disability: a mixed method study. Patient Educ. Couns. 100, 1537–1543 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Masaki, H., Shibata, K., Hoshino, S., Ishihama, T., Saito, N., Yatani, K.: Exploring nudge designs to help adolescent SNS users avoid privacy and safety threats. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376666

  43. Badillo-Urquiola, K., Shea, Z., Agha, Z., Lediaeva, I., Wisniewski, P.: Conducting risky research with teens: co-designing for the ethical treatment and protection of adolescents. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, 231:1–231:46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432930

  44. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. M.E. Sharpe, pp. 348–372 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Czeskis, A., et al.: Parenting from the pocket: value tensions and technical directions for secure and private parent-teen mobile safety. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. pp. 1–15. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1837110.1837130

  46. Agha, Z., Chatlani, N., Razi, A., Wisniewski, P.: Towards conducting responsible research with teens and parents regarding online risks. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383073

  47. Kearney, M.: Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis. Presented at the January 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mund, M., Nestler, S.: Beyond the cross-lagged panel model: next-generation statistical tools for analyzing interdependencies across the life course. Adv. Life Course Res. 41, 100249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.10.002

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the William T. Grant Foundation (#187941, #190017) and National Science Foundation under grants CHS-1844881. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our sponsor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

    Zainab Agha, Karla Badillo-Urquiola & Pamela Wisniewski

  2. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA

    Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky

  3. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Bridget McHugh

Authors
  1. Zainab Agha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karla Badillo-Urquiola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bridget McHugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pamela Wisniewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zainab Agha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA

    Abbas Moallem

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Agha, Z., Ghaiumy Anaraky, R., Badillo-Urquiola, K., McHugh, B., Wisniewski, P. (2021). ‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure. In: Moallem, A. (eds) HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77391-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77392-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation