[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Multi Remote Tower - Challenge or Chance? An Empirical Study of Air Traffic Controllers Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1294))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1727 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of shifting among and updating of mental models in multi remote tower operations.

Background. Within the development of the future workplace for air traffic controllers (ATCO), innovation shifts to multi remote tower operations. Multi remote tower means, that an ATCO serves air traffic control services for more than one airport at a time from one physically remote located workplace. This change requires adjustments in the way how the ATCO works, as multiple mental models need to be updated constantly. Frequent shifting between airports and mental models respectively is necessary. Updating and shifting are cognitive cost sensitive, as they affect workload and situational awareness negatively. In contrast, higher workload could be beneficial for alertness which could act as a countermeasure in turn.

Method. Four 90-min lasting remote tower Human-In-The-Loop simulation runs with traffic and weather were performed by eight conventional tower experienced ATCOs. Each ATCO completed two runs in multi- and two runs in single-mode. Situational awareness, workload and alertness was measured via self-reports before, during and after each run.

Results. No differences between both modes with respect to situational awareness and alertness could be found. However, significant workload differences could be found during the simulation runs at two times, due to a simulated snowstorm.

Conclusion. The findings indicate no negative effect of shifting among and updating of mental models in multi remote tower. A possible explanation could be, that a common hybrid mental model for in multi-mode is internally developed so that shifting among mental models is perhaps not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fürstenau, N., et al.: Steps towards the virtual tower: remote airport traffic control center (RAiCe). In: Proceedings EnRI International Workshop on ATM/CNS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, L., Peukert, M., Josefsson, B., Lundberg, J.: Validation of an empiric method for safety assessment of multi remote tower. In: Proceedings ATM2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer, L., Fricke, H.: Validation of an empiric method for safety assessment of multi remote tower investigating the safety-relevance of limited distinctive features on a multi remote tower-working position. In: Proceedings ATM2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moehlenbrink, C., Papenfuss, A., Jakobi, J.: The role of workload for work organization in a remote tower control center. Air Traffic Control Q. 20(1), 5–26 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mogford, R.H.: Mental models and situation awareness in air traffic control. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 7(4), 331–341 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaber, D., Zhang, Y., Jin, S., Mosaly, P., Garner, M.: Effects of hazard exposure and roadway complexity on young and older driver situation awareness and performance. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 15(5), 600–611 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris, N., Jones, D.M.: Memory updating in working memory: the role of the central executive. Br. J. Psychol. 81(2), 111–121 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oehme, A., Leitner, R., Wittbrodt, N.: Challenges of multiple airport control. Aviat. Psychol. Appl. Hum. Factors 3, 1–8 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., Wager, T.D.: The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn. Psychol. 41(1), 49–100 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thackray, R.I., Bailey, J.P., Touchstone, R.M.: Physiological, subjective, and performance correlates of reported boredom and monotony while performing a simulated radar control task. In: Mackie, R.R. (ed.) Vigilance, pp. 203–215. Springer, Boston (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2529-1_12

  11. Straussberger, S., Schaefer, D.: Monotony in air traffic control. Air Traffic Control Q. 15(3), 183–207 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thackray, R.I.: The stress of boredom and monotony: a consideration of the evidence. Psychosom. Med. 43(2), 165–176 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational Awareness, pp. 111–128. Routledge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan, C.S., Brennen, S.D.: Instantaneous Self-Assessment of Workload Technique (ISA). Defence Research Agency, Portsmouth (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Åkerstedt, T., Gillberg, M.: Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int. J. Neurosci. 52, 29–37 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness in aviation systems. In: Garland, D.J., Wise, J.A., Hopkin, V.D. (eds.) Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, pp. 257–275. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grech, M.R., Neal, A., Yeo, G., Humphreys, M., Smith, S.: An examination of the relationship between workload and fatigue within and across consecutive days of work: is the relationship static or dynamic? J. Occup. Health Psychol. 14(3), 231 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews, G., Desmond, P.A.: Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 55(2), 659–686 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Peukert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peukert, M., Meyer, L., Josefsson, B. (2020). Multi Remote Tower - Challenge or Chance? An Empirical Study of Air Traffic Controllers Performance. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60702-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60703-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics