Mitigating Gender Bias in Machine Learning Data Sets

1. Adams, R., Ni Loideain, N.: Addressing indirect discrimination and gender stereotypes in AI virtual personal assistants: the role of international human rights law. In: Annual Cambridge International Law Conference (2019)

   Google Scholar 

2. Ali, O., Flaounas, I., De Bie, T., Mosdell, N., Lewis, J., Cristianini, N.: Automating news content analysis: an application to gender bias and readability. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Applications of Pattern Analysis, pp. 36–43 (2010)

   Google Scholar 

3. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L.: Machine bias risk assessments in criminal sentencing (2016). ProPublica https://www.propublica.org

4. Baker, P.: Sexed texts: language, gender and sexuality. Equinox (2008)

   Google Scholar 

5. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.W., Zou, J.Y., Saligrama, V., Kalai, A.T.: Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4349–4357 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

6. Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 77–91 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

7. Caldas-Coulthard, C.R., Moon, R.: ‘curvy, hunky, kinky’: using corpora as tools for critical analysis. Discourse Soc. 21(2), 99–133 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Caliskan, A., Bryson, J.J., Narayanan, A.: Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356(6334), 183–186 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Dixon, L., Li, J., Sorensen, J., Thain, N., Vasserman, L.: Measuring and mitigating unintended bias in text classification. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 67–73. ACM (2018)

   Google Scholar 

10. Frith, K., Shaw, P., Cheng, H.: The construction of beauty: a cross-cultural analysis of women’s magazine advertising. J. Commun. 55(1), 56–70 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D., Zou, J.: Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(16), E3635–E3644 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Gonen, H., Goldberg, Y.: Lipstick on a pig: debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03862 (2019)

13. Ingham, P.: Language of gender and class: transformation in the Victorian Novel. Routledge, London (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

14. Lambrecht, A., Tucker, C.: Algorithmic bias? an empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of stem career ads. Management Science (2019)

    Google Scholar 

15. Leavy, S., Meaney, G., Wade, K., Greene, D.: Curatr: a platform for semantic analysis and curation of historical literary texts. In: Garoufallou, E., Fallucchi, F., William De Luca, E. (eds.) MTSR 2019. CCIS, vol. 1057, pp. 354–366. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Martyna, W.: What does ‘he’ mean? use of the generic masculine. J. Commun. 28(1), 131–138 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

18. Mills, S.: Feminist Stylistics. Routledge, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

19. Mollin, S.: Revisiting binomial order in english: ordering constraints and reversibility. Engl. Lang. Linguist. 16(1), 81–103 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Motschenbacher, H.: Gentlemen before ladies? a corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. J. Engl. Linguist. 41(3), 212–242 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Pearce, M.: Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the BNC using sketch engine. Corpora 3(1), 1–29 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

22. Perez, C.C.: Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Abrams (2019)

    Google Scholar 

23. Romaine, S., et al.: Communicating Gender. Psychology Press, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

24. Shor, E., van de Rijt, A., Ward, C., Blank-Gomel, A., Skiena, S.: Time trends in printed news coverage of female subjects, 1880–2008. Journalism Stud. 15(6), 759–773 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Sigley, R., Holmes, J.: Looking at girls in Corpora of English. J. Engl. Linguist. 30(2), 138–157 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Swinger, N., De-Arteaga, M., Heffernan IV, N.T., Leiserson, M.D., Kalai, A.T.: What are the biases in my word embedding? In: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 305–311. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

27. Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., Qin, B.: Learning sentiment-specific word embedding for twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1555–1565 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

28. Vefali, G.M., Erdentuğ, F.: The coordinate structures in a corpus of new age talks: ‘man and woman’/‘woman and man’. Text Talk-An Interdisc. J. Lang. Discourse Commun. Stud. 30(4), 465–484 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Zhang, B.H., Lemoine, B., Mitchell, M.: Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 335–340. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

30. Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Ordonez, V., Chang, K.W.: Gender bias in coreference resolution: evaluation and debiasing methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06876 (2018)

Download references