Abstract
This literature review discusses the possibility of students being the driving force of an interdisciplinary research educational model for creative pedagogy. Current models lack the robust interdisciplinary and individually oriented approach for disciplines in the field of creative studies such as Graphic Design, where the students are the driving force for their educational methods and assessments. This paper posits that, if the education system is designed for the average learner, then the system is designed for none. The purpose of this literature review is to initiate discussions about customized learning plans for the graphic design discipline and to provide ideas about how to progress towards a more user-driven interdisciplinary approach for accomplishing this goal. This review seeks to shed light on the possibilities of individual learning plans across creative disciplines. Finally, the paper synthesizes these diverse ideas into an early stage interdisciplinary model for developing a student-driven learning model for creative pedagogy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Design Education Manifesto, ICOGRADA. A proposal for the future of design education (2011). http://www.icograda.org/uploads/resources/IcogradaEducationManifesto.pdf. Accessed Oct 2000
de Neufville, R., Scholtes, S.: Flexibility in Engineering Design
OCDSB. p. 187 (2011). https://ocdsb.ca/cms/One.aspx?portalId=55478&pageId=238021. Accessed Dec 2019
Augsten, A., Gekeler, M.: From a master of crafts to a facilitator of innovation. How the increasing importance of creative collaboration requires new ways of teaching design. Des. J. 20, S1058–S1071 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353049
Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The learning way: meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. In: Simulation and Gaming, vol. 40, pp. 297–327 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713
Gardner, H.: Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century, Basic Books. ProQuest Ebook Central (2000). https://ebookcentral-proquestcom.proxy.library.carleton.ca/lib/oculcarleton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=903998
Chapman, A.: Bloom’s Taxonomy – learning domains (2006). http://www.businessbalss.com/bloomstaxonomyoflearningdomains.htm. Accessed 21 Aug 2009
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S.: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon (2001). findaddressphonenumbers.com/Address-of-Allyn-and-Bacon-0810
CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. (2018). https://iswnetwork.ca. Accessed Feb 2018
Webb, M.: A definitive critique of experiential learning theory (2003). http://web.archive.org/web/20061109200729/http://www.cc.ysu.edu/~mnwebb/critique/TheCritique_final2_wtp.pdf. Accessed July
Gardner, H.: Multiple Intelligences after twenty years. In: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, 21 April 2003 (2003)
Friedman, K.: Creating design knowledge: from research into practice. In: IDATER 2000 Conference, pp. 13–15 (2019)
Mcdonagh, D.: Design research: methods and perspectives: brenda laurel (editor). Des. J. 7, 55–56 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2752/146069204790718510
Moreno, L.A., Villalba, E.R.: Transdisciplinary design: tamed complexity through new collaboration. Strat. Des. Res. J. 11, 42–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2018.111.07
Dubberly Design Office 10 Models of Teaching + Learning, Pages 9–10 (2009)
Michaelson, M.: Creating the Visitor-Centered Museum. Routledge, New York (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fahlman, A., Frankel, L. (2020). A Student Driven Model for Creative Pedagogy. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Shin, C., Shim, S., Fukuda, S., Montagna, G., Carvalho, C. (eds) Advances in Industrial Design. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1202. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51193-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51194-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)