Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has seen considerable changes in the last decades, offering an increased range of treatment modalities to cancer patients. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), one of the most efficient RT arc techniques, particularly with respect to dose delivery time, has recently considered noncoplanar arc trajectories while irradiating the patient, thanks to technological advances in the most recent generation of RT systems. In a preliminary work we have proposed a two-step optimization approach for noncoplanar arc trajectory optimization (ATO). In this paper, treatment plans considering 5-, 7-, 9-, 11- and 21-beam ensembles in the first step (optimal selection of noncoplanar irradiation directions) of the proposed approach are compared to assess the trade-offs between treatment quality and computational time required to obtain a noncoplanar VMAT plan. The different strategies were tested resorting to a head-and-neck tumor case already treated at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra (IPOC). Results obtained presented similar treatment quality for the different strategies. However, strategies that consider a reduced number of beams in the first step clearly outperform the other strategies in terms of computational times. Results show that for a similar tumor coverage, treatment plans with optimal beam irradiation directions obtained an enhanced organ sparing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cancer tomorrow. http://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/home. Accessed 03 Mar 2020
Atun, R., et al.: Expanding global access to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 16, 1153–1186 (2015)
Lievens, Y., et al.: Radiation oncology. Optimal health for all together. ESTRO vision, 2030. Radiother. Oncol. 136, 86–97 (2019)
Otto, K.: Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med. Phys. 35, 310–317 (2008)
Bangert, M., Ziegenhein, P., Oelfke, U.: Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT. Med. Phys. 40, 011716 (2013)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ventura, T., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: An optimization approach for noncoplanar intensity-modulated arc therapy trajectories. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11621, pp. 199–214. Springer, Cham (2019)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ventura, T., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Beam angle optimization in IMRT: are we really optimizing what matters? Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 26, 908–928 (2019)
Wieser, H.-P., et al.: Development of the open-source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad. Med. Phys. 44, 2556–2568 (2017)
Cassioli, A., Unkelbach, J.: Aperture shape optimization for IMRT treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 301–318 (2013)
Xia, P., Verhey, L.J.: Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. Med. Phys. 25, 1424–1434 (1998)
Aleman, D.M., Kumar, A., Ahuja, R.K., Romeijn, H.E., Dempsey, J.F.: Neighborhood search approaches to beam orientation optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. J. Global Optim. 42, 587–607 (2008)
Wächter, A., Biegler, L.T.: On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 106, 25–57 (2006)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Selection of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment beam directions using radial basis functions within a pattern search methods framework. J. Glob. Optim. 57, 1065–1089 (2013)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Beam angle optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a guided pattern search method. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 2939–2953 (2013)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Pattern search methods framework for beam angle optimization in radiotherapy design. Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 10853–10865 (2013)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT treatment planning using pattern search methods. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 616, 012014 (2015)
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Ventura, T., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT. Med. Phys. 43, 5514–5526 (2016)
Alberto, P., Nogueira, F., Rocha, H., Vicente, L.N.: Pattern search methods for user-provided points: application to molecular geometry problems. SIAM J. Optim. 14, 1216–1236 (2004)
Custódio, A.L., Vicente, L.N.: Using sampling and simplex derivatives in pattern search methods. SIAM J. Optim. 18, 537–555 (2007)
Papp, D., Bortfeld, T., Unkelbach, J.: A modular approach to intensity-modulated arc therapy optimization with noncoplanar trajectories. Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 5179–5198 (2015)
Wild, E., Bangert, M., Nill, S., Oelfke, U.: Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: plan quality versus treatment time. Med. Phys. 42, 2157–2168 (2015)
Ventura, T., Rocha, H., Ferreira, B., Dias, J., Lopes, M.C.: Comparison of two beam angular optimization algorithms guided by automated multicriterial IMRT. Phys. Med. 64, 210–221 (2019)
Acknowledgments
Support for this work was provided by FCT under project grants UIDB/05037/2020 and UIDB/00308/2020 and by project grant POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028030.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rocha, H., Dias, J., Carrasqueira, P., Ventura, T., Ferreira, B., Lopes, M.d.C. (2020). Comparison of Different Strategies for Arc Therapy Optimization. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020. ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58808-3_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58808-3_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58807-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58808-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)