[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Topologic: Exploring Spatial Reasoning Through Geometry, Topology, and Semantics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods in Architecture

Abstract

Topologic is a software modelling library that supports a comprehensive conceptual framework for the hierarchical spatial representation of buildings based on the data structures and concepts of non-manifold topology (NMT). Topologic supports conceptual design and spatial reasoning through the integration of geometry, topology, and semantics. This enables architects and designers to reflect on their design decisions before the complexities of building information modelling (BIM) set in. We summarize below related work on NMT starting in the late 1980s, describe Topologic’s software architecture, methods, and classes, and discuss how Topologic’s features support conceptual design and spatial reasoning. We also report on a software usability workshop that was conducted to validate a software evaluation methodology and reports on the collected qualitative data. A reflection on Topologic’s features and software architecture illustrates how it enables a fundamental shift from pursuing fidelity of design form to pursuing fidelity of design intent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 111.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 139.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 199.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdinnour-Helm, S. F., Chaparro, B. S., & Farmer, S. M. (2005). Using the end-user computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a web site. Decision Sciences, 36(2), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aish, R. (1997). MicroStation/J. In A. K. Noor & J. B. Malone (Eds.), Next Generation CAD/CAM/CAE Systems, NASA Conference Publication, 3357. pp. 167–180. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hampton, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aish, R., Jabi, W., Lannon, S., Wardhana, N. M., & Chatzivasileiadi, A. (2018). Topologic: Tools to explore architectural topology. In L. Hesselgren, A. Kilian, S. Malek, K.-G. Olsson, S.-H. Olga, & C. Williams (Eds.), Advances in architectural geometry 2018 (pp. 316–341). Klein Publishing GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aish, R., & Pratap, A. (2013). Spatial information modeling of buildings using non-manifold topology with ASM and DesignScript. In L. Hesselgren, S. Sharma, J. Wallner, N. Baldassini, P. Bompas, & J. Raynaud (Eds.), Advances in architectural geometry 2012 (pp. 25–36). Vienna: Springer Vienna.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandi, A., & Heeler, P. (2013). Usability testing: A software engineering perspective. In 2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Björk, B.-C. (1992). A conceptual model of spaces, space boundaries and enclosing structures. Automation in Construction, 1(3), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boguslawski, P., & Gold, C. (2010). Euler operators and navigation of multi-shell building models. In T. Neutens & P. Maeyer (Eds.), Developments in 3D geo-information sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boguslawski, P., & Gold, C. (2016). The dual half-edge—A topological primal/dual data structure and construction operators for modelling and manipulating cell complexes. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavalcanti, P. R., Carvalho, P. C. P., & Martha, L. F. (1997). Non-manifold modelling: An approach based on spatial subdivision. Computer-Aided Design, 29(3), 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang, T. W., & Woodbury, R. (1997). Efficient design spaces of non-manifold solids. In Y. Liu, J.-Y. Tsou, & J. Hou (Eds.), Second conference on computer-aided architectural design research in Asia (pp. 335–344). Taiwan: CAADRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chatzivasileiadi, A., Lannon, S., Jabi, W., Wardhana, N. M., & Aish, R. (2018). Addressing pathways to energy modelling through non-manifold topology. In D. Macumber, F. Meggers, & S. Rockcastle (Eds.), SIMAUD 2018: Symposium for Architecture and Urban Design. Delft: Society for Modeling & Simulation International (SCS).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crocker, G. A., & Reinke, W. F. (1991). An editable nonmanifold boundary representation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 11(2), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ecma International. (2005). C++/CLI language specification. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Furiani, F., Martella, G., & Paoluzzi, A. (2017). Geometric computing with chain complexes design and features of a Julia package.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., & Bedford, M. (1976). Space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 3, 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jabi, W. (2016). Linking design and simulation using non-manifold topology. Architectural Science Review, 59(4), 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jabi, W., Aish, R., Lannon, S., Chatzivasileiadi, A., & Wardhana, N. M. (2019). Topologic, https://topologic.app. Last accessed: April 03, 2020.

  20. Jabi, W., Soe, S., Theobald, P., Aish, R., & Lannon, S. (2017). Enhancing parametric design through non-manifold topology. Design Studies, 52, 96–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In A. Holzinger (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society on HCI and Usability for Education and Work (pp. 63–76). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, S.-U., Roh, M.-I., Cha, J.-H., & Lee, K.-Y. (2009). Ship compartment modeling based on a non-manifold polyhedron modeling kernel. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(5), 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., Han, S., & Goh, Y. M. (2011). Design error reduction: Toward the effective utilization of building information modeling. Research in Engineering Design, 22(3), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Masuda, H., Shimada, K., Numao, K., & Kawabe, S. (1989). A mathematical theory and applications of non-manifold geometric modeling. In F.-L. Krause & H. Jansen (Eds.), International Symposium on Advanced Geometric Modelling for Engineering Applications. North-Holland, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCullough, M. (1997). Abstracting craft: The practiced digital hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Open CASCADE. (2018). Open CASCADE, https://www.opencascade.com. Last accessed: May 15, 2018.

  27. Qiuchen Lu, V., Parlikad, A. K., Woodall, P., Ranasinghe, G. D., & Heaton, J. (2019). Developing a dynamic digital twin at a building level: Using Cambridge campus as case study. In M. DeJong, J. Schooling, & G. Viggiani (Eds.), International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC) (pp. 67–75). ICE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts, A., & Marsh, A. (2001). ECOTECT: Environmental prediction in architectural education. In Architectural Information Management: 19th eCAADe Conference (pp. 342–347), Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sabry, H., Sherif, A., Rakha, T., & Fekry, A. (2010). Integration of daylighting simulation software in architectural education. In W. Tizani (Ed.), The 13th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. Nottingham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schön, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spatial Corporation. (1989). 3D ACIS modeler, https://www.spatial.com/products/3d-acis-modeling. Last accessed: March 03, 2020.

  32. Voloshin, V. I. (2013). Introduction to graph and hypergraph theory. Nova Kroshka Books.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weiler, K. J. (1986). Topological structures for geometric modeling. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Woodbury, R., Gün, O. Y., Peters, B., & Sheikholeslami, M. (Roham). (2010). Elements of parametric design. Taylor & Francis, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wassim Jabi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jabi, W., Chatzivasileiadi, A. (2021). Topologic: Exploring Spatial Reasoning Through Geometry, Topology, and Semantics. In: Eloy, S., Leite Viana, D., Morais, F., Vieira Vaz, J. (eds) Formal Methods in Architecture. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57509-0_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics