[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Research on the Evaluation of Chinese Herbal Medicine Quality and Safety Credit Index Based on TOPSIS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Health Information Science (HIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11837))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 983 Accesses

Abstract

Quality and safety evaluation of Chinese herbal medicine has always been a difficult and key issue in the research and application of Chinese herbal medicine, which restricts the modernization and internationalization of Chinese herbal medicine. In this paper, we present a quality and safety credit evaluation index of Chinese herbal medicines production, and the numerical value was used to reflect the quality and safety credit status of Chinese herbal medicine enterprises. TOPSIS method is introduced into the field of quality and safety evaluation of CHM. Considering the multi-level characteristics of the evaluation index system, the weight of the index is calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the ranking of quality and safety credit of CHM in the region is obtained. The quality and safety credit evaluation index of Chinese herbal medicine was constructed. It is an important basic application platform for establishing a sound quality supervision system for Chinese herbal medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Pharmacopoeia Commission. US Pharmacopoeia. 35 edition. Washington:United States Pharmacopoeia Commission, 1–1258 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aydogan, E.K.: Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 3992–3998 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, Y.M., Elhag, T.M.S.: Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Application 31, 309–319 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ri-Jia, D., Hua-Ming, W., Chao, X.: Research on credit evaluation of china’s life insurance companies based on ahp-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Coal Econ. Res. 23(6), 1147–1156 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xiu-jin, D., Xiao-li, W., Jia-hong, Z., Gui-xian, H.: Assessment on quality and safety of the vegetables in Zhejiang market based on AHP. Acta Agriculturae Zhefiangensis 23(6), 1147–1156 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xing, R., Zhu, Y.-L., Song, J.-W.: Evaluation on meropenem using based on weighted TOPSIS method. Chin. J. New Drugs Clin. Rem. 32(5), 389–393 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hua-Nan, L., Feng, X.: Meat food safety credit evaluation indicators and methods. Stat. Decis. 10, 65–68 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of People’s Republic of China. Part 1. Beijing: China Medical Science Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work has been supported by humanities and social science Research Program of Hubei province under Grant No. 17Y059.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China

    Zhi-kang Wang & Hua Guan

Authors
  1. Zhi-kang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hua Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Guan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia

    Hua Wang

  2. Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia

    Siuly Siuly

  3. Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia

    Rui Zhou

  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Fernando Martin-Sanchez

  5. Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia

    Yanchun Zhang

  6. Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Zhisheng Huang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Zk., Guan, H. (2019). Research on the Evaluation of Chinese Herbal Medicine Quality and Safety Credit Index Based on TOPSIS. In: Wang, H., Siuly, S., Zhou, R., Martin-Sanchez, F., Zhang, Y., Huang, Z. (eds) Health Information Science. HIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11837. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32962-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32962-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32961-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32962-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation