[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Knowledge-Aware Conversational Semantic Parsing over Web Tables

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11838))

  • 2383 Accesses

Abstract

Conversational semantic parsing over tables requires knowledge acquiring and reasoning abilities, which have not been well explored by current state-of-the-art approaches. Motivated by this fact, we propose a knowledge-aware semantic parser to improve parsing performance by integrating various types of knowledge. In this paper, we consider three types of knowledge, including grammar knowledge, expert knowledge, and external resource knowledge. First, grammar knowledge empowers the model to effectively replicate previously generated logical form, which effectively handles the co-reference and ellipsis phenomena in conversation Second, based on expert knowledge, we propose a decomposable model, which is more controllable compared with traditional end-to-end models that put all the burdens of learning on trial-and-error in an end-to-end way. Third, external resource knowledge, i.e., provided by a pre-trained language model or an entity typing model, is used to improve the representation of question and table for a better semantic understanding. We conduct experiments on the SequentialQA dataset. Results show that our knowledge-aware model outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches. Incremental experimental results also prove the usefulness of various knowledge. Further analysis shows that our approach has the ability to derive the meaning representation of a context-dependent utterance by leveraging previously generated outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this work, we use the terms “utterance” and “question” interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    In this work, we use the terms “header” and “column name” interchangeably.

References

  1. Artzi, Y., Zettlemoyer, L.: Weakly supervised learning of semantic parsers for mapping instructions to actions. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 1, 49–62 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, B., Han, X., Su, L.: Sequence-to-action: end-to-end semantic graph generation for semantic parsing. In: ACL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cho, K., et al.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1724–1734. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1179

  4. Cho, K., et al.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In: EMNLP (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, L., Lapata, M.: Coarse-to-fine decoding for neural semantic parsing. In: ACL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fader, A., Zettlemoyer, L., Etzioni, O.: Paraphrase-driven learning for open question answering. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 1608–1618 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guu, K., Pasupat, P., Liu, E., Liang, P.: From language to programs: bridging reinforcement learning and maximum marginal likelihood. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1051–1062 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hashimoto, K., Xiong, C., Tsuruoka, Y., Socher, R.: A joint many-task model: growing a neural network for multiple NLP tasks. In: EMNLP (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iyyer, M., Yih, W.t., Chang, M.W.: Search-based neural structured learning for sequential question answering. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1821–1831. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1167. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P17-1167

  10. Krishnamurthy, J., Dasigi, P., Gardner, M.: Neural semantic parsing with type constraints for semi-structured tables. In: EMNLP (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X., Roth, D.: Learning question classifiers. In: COLING (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liang, C., Norouzi, M., Berant, J., Le, Q., Lao, N.: Memory augmented policy optimization for program synthesis with generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02322 (2018)

  13. Liang, P.: Learning executable semantic parsers for natural language understanding. Commun. ACM 59(9), 68–76 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Long, R., Pasupat, P., Liang, P.: Simpler context-dependent logical forms via model projections. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1456–1465 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: ACL (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mudrakarta, P.K., Taly, A., Sundararajan, M., Dhamdhere, K.: It was the training data pruning too! CoRR abs/1803.04579 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neelakantan, A., Le, Q.V., Abadi, M., McCallum, A., Amodei, D.: Learning a natural language interface with neural programmer. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pasupat, P., Liang, P.: Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1470–1480 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pasupat, P., Liang, P.: Inferring logical forms from denotations. CoRR abs/1606.06900 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peng, H., Chang, M.W., tau Yih, W.: Maximum margin reward networks for learning from explicit and implicit supervision. In: EMNLP (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peters, M.E., Neumann, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Yih, W.T.: Dissecting contextual word embeddings: architecture and representation. ArXiv e-prints (Aug 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peters, M., et al.: Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2227–2237 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prolog, P.: Learning to parse database queries using inductive logic programming (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suhr, A., Artzi, Y.: Situated mapping of sequential instructions to actions with single-step reward observation. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2072–2082. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suhr, A., Iyer, S., Artzi, Y.: Learning to map context-dependent sentences to executable formal queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06868 (2018)

  27. Vlachos, A., Clark, S.: A new corpus and imitation learning framework for context-dependent semantic parsing. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 2, 547–559 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong, Y.W., Mooney, R.J.: Learning synchronous grammars for semantic parsing with lambda calculus. In: Annual Meeting-Association for Computational Linguistics, no. 1, p. 960 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, X., Liu, C., Song, D.X.: SQLNet: Generating structured queries from natural language without reinforcement learning. CoRR abs/1711.04436 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yin, P., Zhou, C., He, J., Neubig, G.: StructVAE: tree-structured latent variable models for semi-supervised semantic parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07832 (2018)

  31. Zettlemoyer, L.S., Collins, M.: Learning context-dependent mappings from sentences to logical form. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pp. 976–984 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yibo Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sun, Y. et al. (2019). Knowledge-Aware Conversational Semantic Parsing over Web Tables. In: Tang, J., Kan, MY., Zhao, D., Li, S., Zan, H. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. NLPCC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11838. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32233-5_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32233-5_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32232-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32233-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics