Abstract
Writing in a foreign language is a struggle for learners and revising their writings is time consuming for teachers as well. For this reason, writing support systems have been widely proposed and one of its main functions is to automatically detect and revise errors in learners’ writings. However, the detection technologies are a work in progress and the effectiveness of error revision feedback is arguable. Meanwhile, numerous efforts have been made to enhance learners’ writing proficiency and reduce errors. Reading is considered as one of the important strategies. However, few studies have reported the linguistic knowledge that learners pay attention to and how they use the knowledge of web-based learning in their writings. In this paper, we performed a reading-to-write experiment in a web-based writing environment and analyzed reading materials and learners’ writings to explore how to observe learners’ awareness of syntactic structures in materials. Sentence patterns, proposed in our previous studies, have been introduced to categorize sentences, and the syntactic similarities between reading materials and learners’ writings have been calculated. The experimental results revealed that students showed higher comprehension of content but displayed poor attention towards syntactic structures in reading activities, if the structures were not significantly salient. It is assumed that the similarity measure is effective in observing students’ awareness of syntactic structures in materials, and further studies are needed to automatically observe the awareness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kimura, H., Kimura, T., Shiki, O.: Theory and practice in reading and writing: nurturing independent learning. Taishukan Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo (2010). (in Japanese)
Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., Tetreault, J.: Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners, 2nd edn. Morgan & Claypool Publisher, San Rafael (2014)
Bowerman, C.: Writing and the computer: an intelligent tutoring systems solution. Comput. Educ. 18(1–3), 77–83 (1992)
Yeh, S., Lo, J.: Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Comput. Educ. 52(4), 882–892 (2009)
Kunichika, H., Koga, T., Deyama, T., Murakami, T., Hirashima, T., Takeuchi, A.: Learning support for English composition with error visualization. Trans. Inf. Syst. (Jpn. Ed.) 91(2), 210–219 (2008)
Wilson, J., Czik, A.: Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Comput. Educ. 100, 94–109 (2016)
Truscott, J.: The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Lang. Learn. 46(2), 327–369 (1996)
Chandler, J.: The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. J. Second Lang. Writ. 12(3), 267–296 (2003)
Van der Kleij, F.M., Feskens, R.C.W., Eggen, T.J.H.M.: Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 85(4), 475–511 (2015)
Ackerman, J.M.: Reading, writing, and knowing: the role of disciplinary knowledge in comprehension and composing. Res. Teach. Engl. 25(2), 133–178 (1991)
Ito, F.: L2 reading–writing correlation in Japanese EFL high school students. Lang. Teach. 35(5), 23–29 (2011)
Park, Y., Warschauer, M.: Syntactic enhancement and second language literacy: an experimental study. Lang. Learn. Technol. 20(3), 180–199 (2016)
Kawamura, K., Kashiwagi, H., Kang, M.: An approach toward automatic error detection in learners’ English writing based on the source language. In: 10th International Proceedings on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-Line Learning, pp. 62–65. IARIA, Roma (2018)
Delaney, Y.A.: Investigating the reading-to-write construct. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 7, 140–150 (2008)
Kuhbandner, C., Pekrun, R.: Joint effects of emotion and color on memory. Emotion 13(2), 375–379 (2013)
Gali, N., Mariescu-Istodor, R., Hostettler, D., Fränti, P.: Framework for syntactic string similarity measures. Expert Syst. Appl. 129, 169–185 (2019)
Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 423–430 (2003)
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K01081.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kang, M., Kawamura, K., Shao, S., Kashiwagi, H., Ohtsuki, K. (2019). Measuring Similarity to Observe Learners’ Syntactic Awareness in Web-Based Writing Environments. In: Herzog, M., Kubincová, Z., Han, P., Temperini, M. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2019. ICWL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11841. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35757-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35758-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)