[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Predicting Grass Growth for Sustainable Dairy Farming: A CBR System Using Bayesian Case-Exclusion and Post-Hoc, Personalized Explanation-by-Example (XAI)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11680))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Smart agriculture has emerged as a rich application domain for AI-driven decision support systems (DSS) that support sustainable and responsible agriculture, by improving resource-utilization through better on-farm, management decisions. However, smart agriculture’s promise is often challenged by the high barriers to user adoption. This paper develops a case-based reasoning (CBR) system called PBI-CBR to predict grass growth for dairy farmers, that combines predictive accuracy and explanation capabilities designed to improve user adoption. The system provides post-hoc, personalized explanation-by-example for its predictions, by using explanatory cases from the same farm or county. A key novelty of PBI-CBR is its use of Bayesian methods for case exclusion in this regression domain. Experiments report the tradeoff that occurs between predictive accuracy and explanatory adequacy for different parametric variants of PBI-CBR, and how updating Bayesian priors each year reduces error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several other approaches such as linear regression, neural networks, SVMs and tree algorithms were also tested alongside this CBR system. The CBR system’s accuracy equalled or bettered these other systems.

  2. 2.

    Predictions could only be made for 2017 because the earlier years of the PBI dataset (2013–2016) have too few cases, as the DSS was in its early years of adoption.

  3. 3.

    The relatively large value of 4 was chosen to represent that we are not highly certain of the validity of the gold standard prior mean when compared to a typical dairy farm pasture.

  4. 4.

    The variance \( \sigma^{2} \) wasn’t adapted; if it changes it could lead to an unfair evaluation as updated-variants may differ a lot in the amount of data excluded compared to non-updated variants.

  5. 5.

    Note, for transform methods some knowledge about a given week’s data distribution would need to be inferred if we were doing this in a live-system for formula (2) to be used.

References

  1. Gafsi, M., Legagneux, B., Nguyen, G., Robin, P.: Towards sustainable farming systems: effectiveness and deficiency of the French procedure of sustainable agriculture. Agric. Syst. 90(1–3), 226–242 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindblom, J., Lundström, C., Ljung, M., Jonsson, A.: Promoting sustainable intensification in precision agriculture: review of decision support systems development and strategies. Precis. Agric. 18(3), 309–331 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy, K.P.: Conjugate Bayesian analysis of the Gaussian distribution. def, 1(2σ2), p. 16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruelle, E., Hennessy, D., Delaby, L.: Development of the Moorepark St Gilles grass growth model (MoSt GG model): a predictive model for grass growth for pasture based systems. Eur. J. Agron. 99, 80–91 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poux, X., Aubert, P.M.: An agroecological Europe in 2050: multifunctional agriculture for healthy eating (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: A survey of explanations in recommender systems. In: 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop, pp. 801–810. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hurtado-Uria, C., Hennessy, D., Shalloo, L., O’Connor, D., Delaby, L.: Relationships between meteorological data and grass growth over time in the south of Ireland. Irish Geogr. 46(3), 175–201 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikpour, H., Aamodt, A., Bach, K.: Bayesian analysis in a knowledge-intensive CBR system. In: 22nd UK Symposium on Case-Based Reasoning. Miltos Petridis (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leake, D.B.: Evaluating Explanations: A Content Theory. Psychology Press, London (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Branting, K., Hastings, J.D., Lockwood, J.A.: CARMA: a case-based range management advisor. In: IAAI, pp. 3–10, August 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teagasc - 8/2/19: The Dairy Carbon Navigator. Improving Carbon Efficiency on Irish Dairy Farms. https://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2019/the-dairy-carbon-navigator.php

  12. Cho, Y., Cho, K., Shin, C., Park, J., Lee, E.-S.: A recommend service based on expert knowledge model in agricultural environments. In: Lee, G., Howard, D., Kang, J.J., Ślęzak, D. (eds.) ICHIT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7425, pp. 189–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32645-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cunningham, P., Doyle, D., Loughrey, J.: An evaluation of the usefulness of case-based explanation. In: Ashley, K.D., Bridge, D.G. (eds.) ICCBR 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2689, pp. 122–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45006-8_12

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Holt, A.: Understanding environmental and geographical complexities through similarity matching. Compl. Int. 7, 1–16 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bridge, D., Göker, M.H., McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Case-based recommender systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20(3), 315–320 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hart, P.: The condensed nearest neighbor rule (Corresp.). IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14(3), 515–516 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Redmond, M.A., Highley, T.: Empirical analysis of case-editing approaches for numeric prediction. In: Sobh, T., Elleithy, K. (eds.) Innovations in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, pp. 79–84. Springer, Dordrecht (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sørmo, F., Cassens, J., Aamodt, A.: Explanation in case-based reasoning–perspectives and goals. Artif. Intell. Rev. 24(2), 109–143 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smiti, A., Elouedi, Z.: Overview of maintenance for case based reasoning systems. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 975, 8887 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gates, W.: The reduced nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 18(3), 431–433 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritter, G., Woodruff, H., Lowry, S., Isenhour, T.: An algorithm for a selective nearest neighbor decision rule. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 21, 665–669 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson, D.L.: Asymptotic properties of nearest neighbor rules using edited data. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 2, 408–421 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Guan, D., Yuan, W., Lee, Y.K., Lee, S.: Nearest neighbor editing aided by unlabeled data. Inf. Sci. 179(13), 2273–2282 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aha, D.W., Kibler, D., Albert, M.K.: Instance-based learning algorithms. Mach. Learn. 6, 37–66 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Markovitch, S., Scott, P.D.: The role of forgetting in learning. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 459–465 (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 20(6), 542–556 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruland, T., Aamodt, A., Langseth, H.: Architectures integrating case-based reasoning and bayesian networks for clinical decision support. In: Shi, Z., Vadera, S., Aamodt, A., Leake, D. (eds.) IIP 2010. IAICT, vol. 340, pp. 82–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16327-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Johns, T.: Phytochemicals as evolutionary mediators of human nutritional physiology. Int. J. Pharmacognosy 34(5), 327–334 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Steinfeld, H., et al.: Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food & Agriculture Organization (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goodland, R., Anhang, J.: Livestock and climate change: What if the key actors in climate change are… cows, pigs, and chickens? (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Keane, M.T., Kenny, E.M.: How Case Based Reasoning Explained Neural Networks: An XAI Survey of Post-Hoc Explanation-by-Example in ANN-CBR Twins. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07186 (2019)

  32. Kenny, E.M., Keane, M.T.: Twin-systems to explain artificial neural networks using case-based reasoning: comparative tests of feature-weighting methods in ANN-CBR twins for XAI. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eight International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication has emanated from research conducted with the financial support of (i) Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) to the Insight Centre for Data Analytics under Grant Number 12/RC/2289 and (ii) SFI and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine on behalf of the Government of Ireland to the VistaMilk SFI Research Centre under Grant Number 16/RC/3835.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eoin M. Kenny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kenny, E.M. et al. (2019). Predicting Grass Growth for Sustainable Dairy Farming: A CBR System Using Bayesian Case-Exclusion and Post-Hoc, Personalized Explanation-by-Example (XAI). In: Bach, K., Marling, C. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11680. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29248-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29249-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics