[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Public Sphere 2.0: Targeted Commenting in Online News Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11438))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1995 Accesses

Abstract

With the increase in online news consumption, to maximize advertisement revenue, news media websites try to attract and retain their readers on their sites. One of the most effective tools for reader engagement is commenting, where news readers post their views as comments against the news articles. Traditionally, it has been assumed that the comments are mostly made against the full article. In this work, we show that present commenting landscape is far from this assumption. Because the readers lack the time to go over an entire article, most of the comments are relevant to only particular sections of an article. In this paper, we build a system which can automatically classify comments against relevant sections of an article. To implement that, we develop a deep neural network based mechanism to find comments relevant to any section and a paragraph wise commenting interface to showcase them. We believe that such a data driven commenting system can help news websites to further increase reader engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8542430.stm.

  2. 2.

    https://tinyurl.com/paragraph2comment.

  3. 3.

    After experimenting with different dimensions, results (in terms of precision, recall) were best for 150 dimension.

  4. 4.

    For ML-classifiers, we have computed precision and recall for different combination of (i) POS Tag and Dependency, (ii) LIWC and (iii) Others features but due to space constraint only the best results were shown.

References

  1. Park, D., Sachar, S., Diakopoulos, N., Elmqvist, N.: Supporting comment moderators in identifying high quality online news comments. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1114–1125. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Habermas, J.: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Micó, J.L., Díaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., Masip, P.: Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. Int. J. Press/Politics 16(4), 463–487 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to usability (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Marneffe, M.C., Manning, C.D.: Stanford typed dependencies manual. Technical report, Technical report, Stanford University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1), 24–54 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu, C.F., Khabiri, E., Caverlee, J.: Ranking comments on the social web. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, CSE 2009, vol. 4, pp. 90–97. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dalal, O., Sengemedu, S.H., Sanyal, S.: Multi-objective ranking of comments on web. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 419–428. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bansal, T., Das, M., Bhattacharyya, C.: Content driven user profiling for comment-worthy recommendations of news and blog articles. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 195–202. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shmueli, E., Kagian, A., Koren, Y., Lempel, R.: Care to comment?: recommendations for commenting on news stories. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 429–438. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal, D., Chen, B.C., Pang, B.: Personalized recommendation of user comments via factor models. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 571–582. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X.: Comment centric news analysis for ranking. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 46(1), 1–8 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stroud, N.J., Van Duyn, E., Peacock, C.: News commenters and news comment readers. Engaging News Project (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chakraborty, A., Sarkar, R., Mrigen, A., Ganguly, N.: Tabloids in the era of social media? Understanding the production and consumption of clickbaits in Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02957 (2017)

  17. Chakraborty, A., Messias, J., Benevenuto, F., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P.: Who makes trends? Understanding demographic biases in crowdsourced recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00139 (2017)

  18. Mullick, A., Maheshwari, S., Goyal, P., Ganguly, N., et al.: A generic opinion-fact classifier with application in understanding opinionatedness in various news section. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 827–828 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mullick, A., Ghosh D.S., Maheswari, S., Sahoo, S., Maity, S.K., Goyal, P., et al.: Identifying opinion and fact subcategories from the social web. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, pp. 145–149. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mullick, A., Goyal, P., Ganguly, N.: A graphical framework to detect and categorize diverse opinions from online news. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Modeling of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Social Media (PEOPLES), pp. 40–49 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Almgren, S.M., Olsson, T.: Commenting, sharing and tweeting news. Nordicom Rev. 37(2), 67–81 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P.: Optimizing the recency-relevancy trade-off in online news recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 837–846 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chakraborty, A., Patro, G.K., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P., Loiseau, P.: Equality of voice: towards fair representation in crowdsourced top-k recommendations. In: ACM FAT* (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mullick, A., et al.: Drift in online social media. In: IEEE IEMCON, pp. 302–307, November 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ankan Mullick , Sayan Ghosh , Ritam Dutt , Avijit Ghosh or Abhijnan Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mullick, A., Ghosh, S., Dutt, R., Ghosh, A., Chakraborty, A. (2019). Public Sphere 2.0: Targeted Commenting in Online News Media. In: Azzopardi, L., Stein, B., Fuhr, N., Mayr, P., Hauff, C., Hiemstra, D. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15719-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15719-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15718-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15719-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics