Abstract
To be realistic, evacuation simulations have to consider several aspects of the human psychology that affect their decision-making process. Among them we find social relationships and emotions like fear. The former has been proven to have a great influence on the outcomes of simulations as they modify the behaviour of agents to make them escape in groups. This phenomenon strongly affects the efficiency of the evacuation. The latter impacts the ways the people will try to escape, leading to adaptation and unplanned behaviour. This paper presents an evacuation model that includes cognition with a BDI architecture to represent the way agents do complex reasoning, social relationships and a modelling of fear. The model is applied to simulate the fire of the Rhode Island Station Nightclub in 2003. We shows that after calibration, the model enables to reproduce in a credible way the real event.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These parameter values are computed in the calibration presented in Sect. 5.
- 2.
A shape file is a file format for geographical information systems, it contains all the information linked to the geometry of the described objects.
References
Adam, C., Gaudou, B.: BDI agents in social simulations: a survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 31(3), 207–238 (2016)
Adam, C., Herzig, A., Longin, D.: A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions. Synthese 168(2), 201–248 (2009)
Adam, C., Taillandier, P., Dugdale, J.: Comparing agent architectures in social simulation: BDI agents versus finite-state machines. In: HICSS (2017)
Alizadeh, R.: A dynamic cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles. Saf. Sci. 49(2), 315–323 (2011)
Balke, T., Gilbert, N.: How do agents make decisions? A survey. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(4), 13 (2014)
Bourgais, M., Taillandier, P., Vercouter, L.: Enhancing the behavior of agents in social simulations with emotions and social relations. In: Dimuro, G.P., Antunes, L. (eds.) MABS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10798, pp. 89–104. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6_7
Bratman, M.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Center for the Study of Language and Information (1987)
Caillou, P., Gaudou, B., Grignard, A., Truong, C.Q., Taillandier, P.: A simple-to-use BDI architecture for agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., Flache, A., de Roo, G., Hoogduin, L., Hemelrijk, C. (eds.) Advances in Social Simulation 2015. AISC, vol. 528, pp. 15–28. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_2
Chu, M.L., Parigi, P., Law, K.H., Latombe, J.-C.: Simulating individual, group, and crowd behaviors in building egress. Simulation 91(9), 825–845 (2015)
Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artif. Intell. J. 42(2–3), 213–261 (1990)
El-Tawil, S., Fang, J., Aguirre, B., Best, E.: A computational study of the station nightclub fire accounting for social relationships. JASSS 20(4), 10 (2017)
Grignard, A., Taillandier, P., Gaudou, B., Vo, D.A., Huynh, N.Q., Drogoul, A.: GAMA 1.6: advancing the art of complex agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Boella, G., Elkind, E., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Dignum, F., Purvis, M.K. (eds.) PRIMA 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8291, pp. 117–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44927-7_9
Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D.L., Polhill, J.G., Giske, J., Railsback, S.F.: The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol. Model. 221(23), 2760–2768 (2010)
Grosshandler, W.L., Bryner, N., Madrzykowski, D., Kuntz, K.: Report of the technical investigation of the station nightclub fire. Technical report 2, National Construction Safety Team Act Reports (NIST NCSTAR) (2005)
Herzig, A., Longin, D.: C&L intention revisited. In: Dubois, D., Welty, C., Williams, M.-A., (eds.) KR 2004, Whistler, Canada, 2–5 June, pp. 527–535. AAAI Press (2004)
Lorini, E., Longin, D., Mayor, E.: A logical analysis of responsibility attribution: emotions, individuals and collectives. J. Log. Comput. 24(6), 1313–1339 (2014)
Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Shen, T.-S.: ESM: a building evacuation simulation model. Build. Environ. 40(5), 671–680 (2005)
Shendarkar, A., Vasudevan, K., Lee, S., Son, Y.-J.: Crowd simulation for emergency response using BDI agents based on immersive virtual reality. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 16(9), 1415–1429 (2008)
Song, W., Xuan, X., Wang, B.-H., Ni, S.: Simulation of evacuation processes using a multi-grid model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 363(2), 492–500 (2006)
Taillandier, P., Bourgais, M., Caillou, P., Adam, C., Gaudou, B.: A BDI agent architecture for the GAMA modeling and simulation platform. In: Nardin, L.G., Antunes, L. (eds.) MABS 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10399, pp. 3–23. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67477-3_1
Tsai, J., et al.: ESCAPES: evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison. In: AAMAS, Richland, SC, pp. 457–464 (2011)
Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Yuan, J.P., Fang, Z., Wang, Y.C., Lo, S.M., Wang, P.: Integrated network approach of evacuation simulation for large complex buildings. Fire Saf. J. 44(2), 266–275 (2009)
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by the ANR ACTEUR project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Valette, M., Gaudou, B., Longin, D., Taillandier, P. (2018). Modeling a Real-Case Situation of Egress Using BDI Agents with Emotions and Social Skills. In: Miller, T., Oren, N., Sakurai, Y., Noda, I., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cao Son, T. (eds) PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03097-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03098-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)