The Quality of Teaching - Is There Any Difference Between University Teachers and School Teachers?

1. Azam, M., Kingdon, G.: assessing the teaching quality in India. In: Azam, M., Kingdon, G.G. (eds.) Assessing Teacher Quality in India, 21 October 2014. SSRN (2014). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2512933. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2512933

2. Bollin, A., Reçi, E., Szabó, C., Szabóová, V., Siebenhofer, R.: Applying a maturity model during a software engineering course - experiences and recommendations. In: 2017 IEEE 30th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), pp. 9–18 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

3. Chen, C.Y., Chen, P.C., Chen, P.Y.: Teaching quality in higher education: an introductory review on a process-oriented teaching-quality model. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excellence 25(1–2), 36–56 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Chen, W., Mason, S., Staniszewski, C., Upton, A., Valley, M.: Assessing the quality of teachers’ teaching practices. Educ. Assess. Eval. Accountability 24(1), 25–41 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Dilshad, R.M.: Assessing Quality of Teacher Education: a student perspective. Pakistan J. Soc. Sci. 30(1), 85–97 (2010)

   Google Scholar 

6. Duarte, D., Martins, P.: A maturity model for higher education institution. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Doctoral Consortium (CAISE), pp. 25–45 (2011)

   Google Scholar 

7. Forrester, E.C., Buteau, B.L., Shrum, S.: CMMI for Services: Guidelines for Superior Service. Pearson Education (2011)

   Google Scholar 

8. Helmke, A., et al.: Studienbrief Unterrichtsdiagnostik. Projekt EMU (Evidenzbasierte Methoden der Unterrichtsdiagnostik) der Kultusministerkonferenz. Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau (2010)

   Google Scholar 

9. Ling, T.C., Jusoh, Y.Y., Abdullah, R., Alwi, N.H.: A review study: applying capability maturity model in curriculum design process for higher education. J. Adv. Sci. Arts 3(1), 46–55 (2012)

   Google Scholar 

10. Lutteroth, C., Luxton-Reilly, A., Dobbie, G., Hamer, J.: A maturity model for computing education. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, vol. 66, pp. 107–114. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

11. Marshall, S., Mitchell, G.: Applying SPICE to e-learning: an e-learning maturity model? In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education, vol, 30, pp. 185–191. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

12. Mehrens, W.A.: Assessment of Teaching: Purposes, Practices, and Implications for the Profession, chap. Assessing the Quality of Teacher Assessment Tests, pp. 77–136. Digital Commons University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1990)

    Google Scholar 

13. Montgomery, B.: Developing a Technology Integration Capability Maturity Model for K-12 Schools. Ph.D. thesis, Concordia University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

14. National Education Association: The National Education Association’s Framework for Transforming Education Systems to Support Effective Teaching and Improve Student Learning. http://www.nea.org/home/41858.htm. Accessed 06 Aug 2018

15. Neuhauser, C.: A maturity model: does it provide a path for online course design. J. Interact. Online Learn. 3(1), 1–17 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

16. OECD: TALIS Techn. Rep. Teaching and Learning International Survey. http://www.oecd.org/education/talis. Accessed 06 Aug 2018

17. Petrie, M.: A model for assessment and incremental improvement of engineering and technology education in the americas. In: Proceedings of Second LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

18. Reçi, E., Bollin, A.: Department of Informatics-Didactics, Universität Klagenfurt. http://iid.aau.at/bin/view/Main/Projects. Accessed 01 June 2018

19. Reçi, E., Bollin, A.: Managing the quality of teaching in computer science education. In: Proceedings of the 6th Computer Science Education Research Conference, CSERC 2017, pp. 38–47 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

20. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz (2004) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

21. Snook, I., O’Neill, J., Birks, K.S., Church, J., Rawlins, P.: The Assessment of Teacher Quality: An Investigation into Current Issues in Evaluating and Rewarding Teachers. Education Policy Response Group, Institute of Education, Massey University (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2326315

22. Solar, M., Sabattin, J., Parada, V.: A maturity model for assessing the use of ICT in school education. J. Ed. Tech. & Soc. 16(1), 206 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

23. White, B.A., Longenecker, H.E., Leidig, P.M., Yarbrough, D.: Applicability of CMMI to the IS curriculum: a panel discussion. In: Information Systems Education Conference (ISECON 2003), pp. 1–5 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references