Abstract
Preference-based reinforcement learning has recently been introduced as a generalization of conventional reinformcement learning. Instead of numerical rewards, which are often difficult to specify, the former assumes weaker feedback in the form of qualitative preferences between states or trajectories. A specific realization of preference-based reinforcement learning is approximate policy iteration using label ranking. We propose an extension of this method, in which label ranking is replaced by so-called dyad ranking. The main advantage of this extension is the ability of dyad ranking to learn from feature descriptions of actions, which are often available in reinforcement learning. Several simulation studies are conducted to confirm the usefulness of the approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Note that the number of actions is not fixed per rollout and rather depends on the quality of the current policy. This includes the case that rollouts can stop prematurely before the maximal trajectory length L is reached.
- 2.
Throughout all experiments we used the RPC method in conjunction with logistic regression.
References
Akrour, R., Schoenauer, M., Sebag, M.: Preference-based policy learning. In: Proceedings of ECML/PKDD-2011, Athens, Greece (2011)
Brazdil, P., Giraud-Carrier, C.G.: Metalearning and algorithm selection: progress, state of the art and introduction to the 2018 special issue. Mach. Learn. 107(1), 1–14 (2018)
Cheng, W., Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E., Park, S.H.: Preference-based policy iteration: leveraging preference learning for reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of ECML/PKDD-2011, Athens, Greece (2011)
Dimitrakakis, C., Lagoudakis, M.G.: Rollout sampling approximate policy iteration. Mach. Learn. 72(3), 157–171 (2008)
Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E., Cheng, W., Park, S.H.: Preference-based reinforcement learning: a formal framework and a policy iteration algorithm. Mach. Learn. 89(1–2), 123–156 (2012)
Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)
Hüllermeier, E., Fürnkranz, J., Cheng, W., Brinker, K.: Label ranking by learning pairwise preferences. Artif. Intell. 172, 1897–1917 (2008)
Lagoudakis, M., Parr, R.: Reinforcement learning as classification: leveraging modern classifiers. In: Proceedings of ICML, 20th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 20, pp. 424–431. AAAI Press (2003)
Schäfer, D., Hüllermeier, E.: Plackett-Luce networks for dyad ranking. In: Workshop LWDA, Lernen, Wissen, Daten, Analysen, Potsdam, Germany (2016)
Schäfer, D., Hüllermeier, E.: Dyad ranking using a bilinear Plackett-Luce model. In: Appice, A., Rodrigues, P.P., Santos Costa, V., Gama, J., Jorge, A., Soares, C. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9285, pp. 227–242. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23525-7_14
Schäfer, D., Hüllermeier, E.: Dyad ranking using Plackett-Luce models based on joint feature representations. Mach. Learn. (2018)
Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey. Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2008)
Sutton, R.S.: Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Mach. Learn. 3(1), 9–44 (1988)
Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Tsochantaridis, I., Joachims, T., Hofmann, T., Altun, Y.: Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6, 1453–1484 (2005)
Vembu, S., Gärtner, T.: Label ranking: a survey. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E., (eds.) Preference Learning. Springer (2010)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)
Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3), 272–292 (1992)
Wirth, C., Akrour, R., Neumann, G., Fürnkranz, J.: A survey of preference-based reinforcement learning methods. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 136:1–136:46 (2017)
Xiao, H., Rasul, K., Vollgraf, R.: Fashion-MNIST: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms (2017), arXiv:1708.07747
Zhao, Y., Kosorok, M.R., Zeng, D.: Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials. Stat. Med. 28(15), 1982–1998 (2009)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center “On-The-Fly Computing” (SFB 901). We are grateful to Javad Rahnama for his help with the case study on image pipeline configuration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schäfer, D., Hüllermeier, E. (2018). Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning Using Dyad Ranking. In: Soldatova, L., Vanschoren, J., Papadopoulos, G., Ceci, M. (eds) Discovery Science. DS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11198. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01771-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01771-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01770-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01771-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)