[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Automated Consistency Preservation in Electronics Development of Cyber-Physical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations (STAF 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11176))

  • 982 Accesses

Abstract

Computer-aided development of complex cyber-physical systems usually takes place in engineering teams with several different expert roles using a range of various software tools. This results in numerous artifacts created during this process. However, these artifacts commonly contain plenty of overlapping information. Therefore, the editing of one model by a developer may lead to inconsistencies with other models. Keeping these artifacts manually consistent is time-consuming and error-prone. In this paper, we present an automated strategy to ensure consistency between two widely used categories of software tools in electrical engineering: an electronic design automation application for designing printed circuit boards (PCBs) and an electronic circuit simulator tool to predict system behavior at runtime.

Coupling these two types of tools provides the developers with the ability of efficiently testing and optimizing the behavior of the electric circuit during the PCB design process. For the proper preservation of consistency, assigning the model elements correctly between different tools is required. To avoid the disadvantages of ambiguous heuristic matching methods, we present a strategy based on annotated identifiers in order to ensure a reliable assignment of these model elements. We have implemented the described approach by using Eagle CAD as PCB software and Matlab/Simulink with the Simscape extension as the simulation tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson, C., Stoll, D., Bostan, P.: Orthographic software modeling: a practical approach to view-based development. In: Maciaszek, L.A., González-Pérez, C., Jablonski, S. (eds.) ENASE 2008. CCIS, vol. 69, pp. 206–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14819-4_15

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Broy, M.: Challenges in automotive software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2006, pp. 33–42. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burger, E.J.: Flexible views for view-based model-driven development. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Doctoral Symposium on Components and Architecture, WCOP 2013, pp. 25–30. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diskin, Z., Xiong, Y., Czarnecki, K., Ehrig, H., Hermann, F., Orejas, F.: From state- to delta-based bidirectional model transformations: the symmetric case. In: Whittle, J., Clark, T., Kühne, T. (eds.) MODELS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6981, pp. 304–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24485-8_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kramer, M.E.: Specification languages for preserving consistency between models of different languages. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Langer, P., et al.: A posteriori operation detection in evolving software models. J. Syst. Softw. 86(2), 551–566 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neema, H., et al.: Design space exploration and manipulation for cyber physical systems. In: IFIP First International Workshop on Design Space Exploration of Cyber-Physical Systems (IDEAL 2014). Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt, M., Gloetzner, T.: Constructing difference tools for models using the SiDiff framework. In: Companion of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE Companion 2008, pp. 947–948, ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stephan, M., Cordy, J.R.: A survey of model comparison approaches and applications. In: Modelsward, pp. 265–277 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Zimmermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, D., Reussner, R.H. (2018). Automated Consistency Preservation in Electronics Development of Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Mazzara, M., Ober, I., Salaün, G. (eds) Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations. STAF 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11176. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04771-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04771-9_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04770-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04771-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics