Abstract
In the late 1960s, Mischel (1968) sparked a debate in personality psychology by critiquing the reliance on trait-based frameworks of behavior. While the standard approach had been to measure stable dispositions (such as Extraversion), Mischel argued that behavior was largely determined by situational demands (such as being at a party). In the decades that followed, while there have been loud calls within the field to embrace an interactionist approach, research in personality psychology has still largely sidelined situational factors (Endler and Parker 1992) and has continued to focus on standardizing trait measures (Costa and McCrae 1985; Goldberg 1992).
Virtual worlds evoke this person-situation debate not because we are able to create impossible and fantastic scenarios, but because of the degree of control we are able to have over social interactions. Unlike the physical world, all the rules of social interaction in a virtual world have to be explicitly coded. These rules dictate the maximum size of ad hoc groups, the distance your voice can travel, whether other players can hurt you, and the consequences of dying. As Lessig has noted, “Cyberspace does not guarantee its own freedom but instead carries an extraordinary potential for control. … Architecture is a kind of law: it determines what people can and cannot do” (Lessig 1999: 58-59). Indeed, we are not free to do whatever we want to do in virtual worlds, especially massively multiplayer online games (MMOs). There are consequences to dying, and these rules vary from game to game. While we tend to think of altruism and gregariousness as personality traits, virtual worlds allow us to ask how the social architectures of these environments can be engineered to shape individual and community behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailenson JN, Beall AC, Loomis J, Blascovich J, Turk M (2004) Transformed social interaction: Decoupling representation from behavior and form in collaborative virtual environments. Presence 13:428-441
Bailenson JN, Beall AC, Blascovich J, Loomis J, Turk M (2005) Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments. Human Communication Research 31:511-537
Bailenson JN, Garland P, Iyengar S, Yee N (2006) Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Psychology 27:373-386
Bailenson JN, Iyengar S, Yee N, Collins NA (2008) Facial similarity between voters and candidates causes influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 72:935-961
Berscheid E, Walster EH (1979) Interpersonal attraction. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA
Brock TC (1965) Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1:650-654
Byrne D (1971) The attraction paradigm. Academic, New York
Costa PT, McCrae RR (1985) The NEO personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL
Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24:285-290
Ducheneaut N, Yee N, Nickell E, Moore RJ (2006) ‘Alone Together?’ Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Proceedings of CHI 2006, New York, ACM, 407-416
Ducheneaut N, Yee N, Nickell E, Moore RJ (2007) The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of CHI 2007, New York, ACM, 839-884
Endler N, Parker J (1992) Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area. European Journal of Personality 6:177-198
Frank M, Gilovich T (1988) The dark side of self and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:74-85
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago, IL
Goldberg L (1992) The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:1216-1229
Johnson R, Downing L (1979) Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:1532-1538
iTinySoft (2002) Magic morph. Retrieved March 21, 2004, from http://www.effectmatrix.com/morphing/index.htm
Lessig L (1999) Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books, New York
Mischel W (1968) Personality and assessment. Wiley, New York
Shanteau JS, Nagy GF (1979) Probability of acceptance in dating choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:522-533
Snyder M, Tanke ED, Berscheid E (1977) Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 35(9):656-666
Yee N (2006a) The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15:309-329
Yee N (2006b) The labor of fun: How video games blur the boundaries of work and play. Games and Culture 1:68-71
Yee N, Bailenson J (2007) The Proteus Effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research 33:271-290
Young TJ, French LA (1996) Height and perceived competence of US Presidents. Perceptual and Motor Skills 82: 1002
Zajonc R (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9:1-27
Zajonc, R. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current directions in psychological science, 10:224-228
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yee, N. (2010). Changing the Rules: Social Architectures in Virtual Worlds. In: Bainbridge, W. (eds) Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-825-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-825-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-824-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-825-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)