An Approach for Building an OWL Ontology for Workflow Interoperability

1. Hamri. S, Boufaida. M, Boudjlida. N, “An Architecture for the Interoperability of Workflow Models”, In Proceedings of the first international workshop on Interoperability of Heterogeneous Information Systems, ACM, Germany, 2005, p 31.

   Google Scholar 

2. “ebXML Business Process Specification Schema Version 1.01”, ebXML Business Process Project Team, mai 2001, http://www.ebXML.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf

   Google Scholar 

3. WfMC, Proposal for an Asynchronous HTTP binding of Wf-XML, June 1, 2000.

   Google Scholar 

4. Chauvet. J.M, «Web Services avec SOAP, WSDL, UDDI, ebXML...», Eyrolles 2002.

   Google Scholar 

5. Satish Thatte, «XLANG, Web Services for business process design», Mai 2001.

   Google Scholar 

6. «Web Services Choreography Interface1.0», BEA systems, Sun Microsystems, 2002.

   Google Scholar 

7. Workflow Management Coalition, Workflow Process Definition Interface, XML Process Definition Language, Document Number TC-1025, May 22, 2001.

   Google Scholar 

8. Jean Bézivin, “Who’s Afraid of Ontologies”, OOPSLA’98 Workshop: Model Engineering, Methods and tools Integration with CDIF, Vancouver October 1998.

   Google Scholar 

9. D. Djuric, D. Gasevic and V. Devedzic, “Ontology Modeling and MDA”, Journal on Object Technology, Vol 4, N 1, January-February 2005, Online at http://www.jot.fm.

   Google Scholar 

10. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation (2004) http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref20040210/

    Google Scholar 

11. Gašević, D. Et al: “Bridging MDA and Ontologies”, Journal of Web Engineering, Vol, 4, No.2 (2005) 118–143.

    Google Scholar 

12. http://protégé.stanford.edu/plugin.

    Google Scholar 

13. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification v1.4 OMG Document format/02-04-03, (2002), http:://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc, format/02-04-03.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references