[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Collaborative Filtering Recommendation of Educational Content in Social Environments Utilizing Sentiment Analysis Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning

Abstract

Collaborative filtering techniques are commonly used in social networking environments for proposing user connections or interesting shared resources. While metrics based on access patterns and user behaviour produce interesting results, they do not take into account qualitative information, i.e. the actual opinion of a user that used the resource and whether or not he would propose it for use to other users. This is of particular importance on educational repositories, where the users present significant deviations in goals, needs, interests and expertise level. In this paper, we examine the benefits from introducing sentiment analysis techniques on user-generated comments in order to examine the correlation of an explicit rating with the polarity of an associated text, to retrieve additional explicit information from user comments when a standard rating is missing and expand tried recommendation calculation with qualitative information based on the community’s opinion before proposing the resource to another user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Madison, WI, July 1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J (2001) Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW ‘01), New York, NY, USA, pp 285–295

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shardanand U, Maes P (1995) Social information filtering: algorithms for automating ‘word of mouth’. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Co, 1995, pp 210–217

    Google Scholar 

  5. Resnick P, Iakovou N, Sushak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J (1994) Group Lens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering on netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer Supported cooperative work, New York, NY, USA, 1994, pp 175–186

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J (2000) Analysis of recommendation algorithms for e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on electronic commerce, Minneapolis, MN, October 2000, pp 158–176

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manouselis N, Vuorikari R, Van Assche F (2010) Collaborative recommendation of e-Learning resources: an experimental investigation. J Comput Assist Learn 26(4):227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Vuorikari R, Hummel H, Koper R (2011) Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In: Kantor P, Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (eds) Recommender systems handbook. Springer, NY, pp 387–415

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson M, Ball M, Boley H, Greene S, Howse N, Lemire D McGrath S (2003) RACOFI: a rule-applying collaborative filtering system. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC COLA'03, Halifax, Canada, October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dron J, Mitchell R, Boyne C, Siviter P (2000) CoFIND: steps towards a self-organising learning environment. In: Proceedings of WebNet Proceedings of WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet 2000, San Antonio, TX, 2000, pp 146–151

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manouselis N, Vuorikari R, Van Assche F (2007) Simulated analysis of MAUT collaborative filtering for learning object recommendation. In: Proceedings of the workshop on social information retrieval in technology enhanced learning (SIRTEL 2007), Crete, Greece, 2007, pp 17–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang T, McCalla G (2003) Smart recommendation for an evolving e-learning system. In: Proceedings of the workshop on technologies for electronic documents for supporting learning, international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2003), Sydney, Australia, July 20–24 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nadolski R, Van den Berg B, Berlanga A, Drachsler H, Hummel H, Koper R, Sloep P (2009) Simulating light-weight personalised recommender systems in learning networks: a case for pedagogy-oriented and rating based hybrid recommendation strategies. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 12(14)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hummel H, Van den Berg B, Berlanga AJ, Drachsler H, Janssen J, Nadolski RJ, Koper EJR (2007) Combining social- and information-based approaches for personalised recommendation on sequencing learning activities. Int J Learn Tech 3(2):152–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herlocker JL, Konstan J, Terveen LG, Riedl J (2004) Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):5–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sicilia MA, Garca-Barriocanal E, Sanchez-Alonso S, Cechinel C (2010) Exploring user-based recommender results in large learning object repositories: the case of MERLOT. In: Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Verbert K, Santos OC (eds) Proceedings of the 1st workshop on recommender systems for technology enhanced learning (RecSysTEL 2010). Procedia Computer Science, 1(2):2859–2864

    Google Scholar 

  17. Massa P, Avesani P (2007) Trust-aware recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 07), New York, NY, USA, 2007, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bedi P, Kaur H, Marwaha S (2007) Trust based recommender system for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 07), San Francisco, 2007, pp 2677–2682

    Google Scholar 

  19. Andersen R, Borgs C, Chayes J, Feige U, Flaxman A, Kalai A, Mirrokni V, Tennenholtz M (2008) Trust-based recommendation systems: an axiomatic approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on World Wide Web (WWW 08), New York, 2008, pp 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  20. MERLOT (2013) Multimedia educational resource for learning and online teaching. http://www.merlot.org. Accessed Feb 2013

  21. (2013) Organic.Edunet. http://portal.organic-edunet.eu/. Accessed Feb 2013

  22. Weng J, Miao C, Goh A (2006) Improving collaborative filtering with trust-based metrics. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied computing, 2006, pp 1860–1864

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lathia N, Hailes S, Capra L (2008) Trust-based collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the Joint iTrust and PST conferences on privacy, trust management and security (IFIPTM), 2008, pp 14–29

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Durant K, Smith M (2006) Mining sentiment classification from political web logs. In: Proceedings of workshop on web mining and web usage analysis of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (WebKDD-2006), Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 2006

    Google Scholar 

  26. Turney P (2002) Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL ‘02), Philadelphia, PA, July 2002, pp 417–424

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kamps J, Marx M, Mokken RJ (2004) Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. In: LREC 2004, vol IV. pp 1115–1118

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hatzivassiloglou V, Wiebe J (2000) Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on computational linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 299–305

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy A, Inkpen D (2006) Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters. Computational Intelligence (special issue), Vol. 22, No. 2, 2006, pp 110–125

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andreevskaia A, Bergler S, Urseanu M (2007) All blogs are not made equal: exploring genre differences in sentiment tagging of blogs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-2007), Boulder, CO, March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  31. Akshay J (2007) A framework for modeling influence, opinions and structure in social media. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vancouver, BC, July 2007, pp 1933–1934

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme, in the context of the SYNC3 (ICT-231854) project.

This paper also includes research results from work that has been funded with support of the European Commission, and more specifically the project CIP-ICT-PSP-270999 “Organic.Lingua: Demonstrating the potential of a multilingual Web portal for Sustainable Agricultural & Environmental Education” of the ICT Policy Support Programme (ICT PSP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pythagoras Karampiperis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karampiperis, P., Koukourikos, A., Stoitsis, G. (2014). Collaborative Filtering Recommendation of Educational Content in Social Environments Utilizing Sentiment Analysis Techniques. In: Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O. (eds) Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0530-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0530-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0529-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0530-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics