Can Relational DBMS Scale Up to the Cloud?

• Abadi DJ, Boncz PA, Harizopoulos S (2009) Column-oriented database systems. Proc VLDB Endow 2(2):1664–1665

  Google Scholar 

• Agrawal R et al (2009) The Claremont report on database research. Commun ACM 52(6):56–65

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Armbrust M et al (2009) Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing. EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Technical report. UCB/EECS-2009-28

  Google Scholar 

• Atkinson M et al (1989) The object-oriented database system manifesto, Citeseer

  Google Scholar 

• Brantner M et al (2008) Building a database on S3. SIGMOD ‘08. ACM, Vancouver

  Google Scholar 

• Brewer EA (2000) Towards robust distributed systems. ACM PODC conference.

  Google Scholar 

• Částková Z, Pokorný J (2010) Schema-less XML in columns. In: 22nd Australasian database conference (ADC 2011), Perth, Australia

  Google Scholar 

• Ceri S, Pelagatti G (1984) Distributed databases principles and systems. McGraw-Hill computer science series 1984. McGraw-Hill, New York. 0-07-010829-3

  Google Scholar 

• Chang F et al (2006) Bigtable: a distributed storage system for structured data. OSDI ‘06

  Google Scholar 

• Codd EF (1970) A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun ACM 13(6):377–387

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Codd EF (1971) Normalized data structure: a brief tutorial. ACM-SIGFIDET workshop on data description, access and control. ACM, San Diego

  Google Scholar 

• Colliat G (1996) OLAP, relational, and multidimensional database systems. ACM SIGMOD Rec 25(3):64–69

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cooper BF et al (2008) PNUTS: Yahoo!’s hosted data serving platform. Proc VLDB Endow 1(2):1277–1288

  Google Scholar 

• Das S et al (2010) Elastras: an elastic, scalable, and self managing transactional database for the cloud. UCSB computer science technical report 2010-04. UCSB. http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~sudipto/tech_reports/2010-04.pdf

• Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51(1):107–113

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenberg A, Melton J (1999) SQL: 1999, formerly known as SQL3. ACM SIGMOD Rec 28(1):138

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenberg A et al (2004) SQL: 2003 has been published. ACM SIGMOD Rec 33(1):119–126

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Feuerlicht G (2010) Database trends and directions: current challenges and opportunities. DATASO 2010. Matfyzpress, Štědronín, Czech Republic

  Google Scholar 

• Fitzpatrick B (2004) Distributed caching with memcached. Linux J 2004(124), p 5

  Google Scholar 

• Gilbert S, Lynch N (2002) Brewer’s conjecture and the feasibility of consistent, available, partition-tolerant web services. ACM SIGACT News 33(2):51–59

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Intel (2011) Moore’s Law [cited 4 April 2011]. Available from: http://www.intel.com/about/companyinfo/museum/exhibits/moore.htm

• Lakshman A et al (2010) Cassadra [cited 04-04-2011]. Available from: http://www.slideshare.net/jhammerb/data-presentations-cassandra-sigmod/

• Maia F et al (2010) Scalable transactions in the cloud: partitioning revisited. On the move to meaningful internet systems, OTM 2010, pp 785–797

  Google Scholar 

• Melton J (2002) Advanced SQL 1999: understanding object-relational, and other advanced features. Elsevier Science Inc, New York, p 592

  Google Scholar 

• Ousterhout J et al (2010) The case for RAMClouds: scalable high-performance storage entirely in DRAM. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 43(4):92–105

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pokorný J (2010) Databases in the 3rd millennium: trends and research directions. J Syst Integr 1(1–2)

  Google Scholar 

• Pritchett D (2008) Base: an acid alternative. Queue 6(3):48–55

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rothschild J (2009) High performance at massive scale – lessons learned at Facebook. CNS 2009 lecture series archives 2009 [cited 15 March 2010; Centre for Networked Systems Lecture]. Available from: http://cns.ucsd.edu/lecturearchive09.shtml

• Schöning H (2001) Tamino-a DBMS designed for XML. IEEE Computer Society

  Google Scholar 

• Stonebraker M (2010) Errors in database systems. Eventual consistency, and the CAP Theorem. http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/83396-errors-in-database-systems-eventual-consistency-and-the-cap-theorem/fulltext

• Stonebraker M, Cetintemel U (2005) One size fits all: an idea whose time has come and gone. IEEE. 0769522858

  Google Scholar 

• Stonebraker M et al (1990) Third-generation database system manifesto. SIGMOD Rec 19(3):31–44

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stonebraker M et al (2005) C-store: a column-oriented DBMS. VLDB Endowment. 1595931546

  Google Scholar 

• Stonebraker M et al (2007) One size fits all? Part 2: Benchmarking results. In: Third biennial conference on innovative data systems research (CIDR), California, USA

  Google Scholar 

• Widom J. Data management for XML: research directions. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on: p 44

  Google Scholar 

Download references