An evaluation scheme for trader user interfaces

1. C. Bowman, P. Danzig, and M. Schwartz. Research problems for scalable internet resource discovery. Technical Report CU-CS-643–93, University of Colorado at Boulder, March 1993.

   Google Scholar 

2. M. Bearman. Odp-trader. In J. De Meer, B. Mahr, and S. Storp, editors, Open Distributed Processing, II, IFIP Transactions C-20, pages 37–51. North-Holland, 1993.

   Google Scholar 

3. D. Ellis. The physical and cognitive paradigms in information retrieval research. Journal of Documentation, 48 (1): 45–64, March 1992.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. B. Shniederman. Designing the User Interface. Addison Wesley, second edition, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

5. Z. Milosevic, A. Lister, and M. Bearman. New economic-driven aspects of the odp enterprise specification and related quality of service issues. In DSTC Trader Workshop, 1993.

   Google Scholar 

6. M. Bates. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13 (5): 407–424, 1989.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. G. Salton. Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1968.

   Google Scholar 

8. M. Hancock. Subject searching behaviour at the library catalogue and at the shelves: Implications for online interactive catalogues. Journal of Documentation,43(4):303321, December 1987.

   Google Scholar 

9. V. O’ Day and R. Jefferies. Orienteering in information landscape: How information seekers get from here to there. In INTERCHI’ 93 “Human Factors in Computing Systems”, pages 438–445, 1993.

   Google Scholar 

10. S. Allen and J. Matherson. Development of a semantic differential to assess users’ attitudes towards a batch mode information retrieval system (eric). JASIS,27(5):268272, September 1977.

    Google Scholar 

11. A. Rushinek and S. Rushinek. What makes users happy? Communications to the ACM, 29 (7): 594–598, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. National Information Standards Organization. Information retrieval application service definition and protocol specification for open systems interconnection: an American National Standard. NISO Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

13. C. Kuhlthau. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49 (4): 339–355, December 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. P. Bysouth. End User Searching: The effective gateway to published information. Aslib, The association for information management, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

15. M. Bates. Factors affecting subject catalog search success. JASIS, 28 (3): 161–169, May 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. M. Bates. Subject Access in Online Catalogs: A Design Model. JASIS 37(6):357376, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

17. N. Belkin and W. Croft. Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two sides of the Same Coin? Communications to the ACM, 35 (12): 29–38, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. N. Belkin, R. Oddy, and H. Brooks. ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38 (2): 61–71, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

19. G. Salton. Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems. Communications to the ACM, 29 (7): 648–656, July 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. J. Conklin. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20 (9): 17–41, September 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. M. Bates. Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing and Management, 26 (5): 575–591, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

22. R. Fidel. Moves in online searching. Online Review, 9 (1): 61–74, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. M. Bates. Information search tactics. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 30 (4): 205–214, July 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. M. Bates. Idea tactics. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 30 (5): 280–289, September 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. D. Ellis. A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. The Journal of Documentation 45(3):171–212, September 1989. 156 Part Two Reviewed Papers

    Google Scholar 

26. D. Ellis, D. Cox, and K. Hall. A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation,49(4):356369, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

27. S. Harter and A. Peter. Heuristics for online information retrieval: a typology and preliminary listing. Online Review, 9 (5): 407–424, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. M. Sarker and M. Brown. Graphical fisheye views of graphs. In CHI’92 “Human Factors in Computing Systems”, pages 83–91, May 1992.

    Google Scholar 

29. A. Spoerri. Infocrystal: A visual tool for information retrieval and management. In CIKM’93 “Information and Knowledge Management”, pages 11–20, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

30. M. Chalmers. Visualisation of complex information. In EWHCI’93, pages 152–162, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

31. J. Waterworth and M. Chingell. A model for information exploration. Hypermedia, 3: 35–58, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

32. P. Riddle. Library culture, computer culture, and the internet haystack. http://is.rice.edu/“riddle/d194.html, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

33. A. Goodchild. Issues in building virtual libraries. Technical Report 310, Department of Computer Science, The University of Queensland, Australia., September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references