Co-Allocation in Grids: Experiences and Issues

1. The Advanced School for Computing and Imaging. www.asci.tudelft.nl.

   Google Scholar 

2. H.E. Bal and D.H.J. Epema et al. The Distributed ASCI Supercomputer Project. ACM Operating Systems Review, 34(4):76–96, 2000.

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. S. Banen, A.I.D. Bucur, and D.H.J. Epema. A Measurement-Based Simulation Study of Processor Co-Allocation in Multicluster Systems. In D.G. Feitelson, L. Rudolph, and U. Schwiegelshohn, editors, Proc. of the 9th Workshop on Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, volume 2862 of LNCS, pages 105–128. Springer-Verlag, 2003.

   Google Scholar 

4. R. Baxter and N. Chue Hong. Bringing the Grid to the Biomedical Workbench. In Proc. of the 11th IEEE Int’l Symp. on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC-11), 2002.

   Google Scholar 

5. R.G. Belleman and R. Shulakov. High Performance Distributed Simulation for Interactive Simulated Vascular Reconstruction. In P.M.A. Sloot, C.J. Kenneth Tan, Jack J. Dongarra, and Alfons G. Hoekstra, editors, International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, volume 2331 of LNCS, pages 265–274, Berlin, April 2002. Springer-Verlag.

   Google Scholar 

6. A.I.D. Bucur and D.H.J. Epema. Priorities among Multiple Queues for Processor Co-Allocation in Multicluster Systems. In Proc. of the 36th Annual Simulation Symp., pages 15–27. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003.

   Google Scholar 

7. A.I.D. Bucur and D.H.J. Epema. The Performance of Processor Co-Allocation in Multicluster Systems. In Proc. of the 3rd IEEE/ACM Int’l Symp. on Cluster Computing and the GRID (CCGrid2003), pages 302–309. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003.

   Google Scholar 

8. A.I.D. Bucur and D.H.J. Epema. Trace-Based Simulations of Processor Co-Allocation Policies in Multiclusters. In Proc. of the 12th IEEE Int’l Symp. on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC-12), pages 70–79. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003.

   Google Scholar 

9. A.I.D. Bucur, R. Kootstra, and R.G. Belleman. A Grid Architecture for Medical Applications. In To appear in Proc. of the 3rd HealthGrid Conference, pages 241–252, 2005.

   Google Scholar 

10. K. Czajkowski, I. Foster, and C. Kesselman. Resource Co-Allocation in Computational Grids. In Proc. of the 8th IEEE Int’l Symp. on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC-8), pages 219–228, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

11. The Distributed ASCI Supercomputer (DAS). www.cs.vu.nl/das2.

    Google Scholar 

12. C. Ernemann, V. Hamscher, U. Schwiegelshohn, R. Yahyapour, and A. Streit. On Advantages of Grid Computing for Parallel Job Scheduling. In Proc. of the 2nd IEEE/ACM Int’ I Symp. on Cluster Computing and the GRID (CCGrid2002), pages 39–46, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

13. F. van Hees, A.J. van der Steen, and P.J. van Leeuwen. A Parallel Data Assimilation Model for Oceanographic Observations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 15:1191–1204, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. The Globus Toolkit, www.globus.org.

    Google Scholar 

15. GridLab. www.gridlab.org.

    Google Scholar 

16. H.H. Mohamed and D.H.J. Epema. The Design and Implementation of the KOALA Co-Allocating Scheduler. In European Grid Conference, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

17. H.H. Mohamed and D.H.J. Epema. Experiences with the KOALA Co-Allocating Scheduler in Multiclusters. In 5th IEEE/ACM Int’l Symp. on Cluster Computing and the GRID (CCGrid2005), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

18. Iperf Version 1.7.0. http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/.

    Google Scholar 

19. N. Kang, J. Zhang, and E.S. Carlson. Parallel Computation in Simulating Diffusion and Deformation in Human Brain. Technical Report 418-04, Dept. of Comp. Science, Univ. of Kentucky, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

20. Joy P. Ku, Mary T. Draney, Frank R. Arko, W. Anthony Lee, Frandics P. Chan, Norbert J. Pelc, Christopher K. Zarins, and Charles A. Taylor. In Vivo Validation of Numerical Prediction of Blood Flow in Arterial Bypass Grafts. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 30:743–752, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. H.H. Mohamed and D.H.J. Epema. An Evaluation of the Close-to-Files Processor and Data Co-Allocation Policy in Multiclusters. In CLUSTER 2004, IEEE Int’l Conf. on Cluster Computing, pages 287–298, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

22. S. Mori and P.C. van Zijl. Fiber Tracking: Principles and Strategies—a Technical Review. NMR Biomed, 15(7–8):468–480, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research. www.nibr.novartis.com.

    Google Scholar 

24. Seti@home. www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu.

    Google Scholar 

25. The Sun Grid Engine. http://gridengine.sunsource.net.

    Google Scholar 

26. T. Röblitz, F. Schintke, and J. Wendler. Elastic Grid Reservations with User-Defined Optimization Policies. In Workshop on Adaptive Grid Middleware (AGridM’04), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

27. R. V. van Nieuwpoort, J. Maassen, H.E. Bal, T. Kielmann, and R. Veldema. Wide-Area Parallel Programming Using the Remote Method Invocation Method. Concurrency: Practice and Experience, 12(8):643–666, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

28. R.V. van Nieuwpoort, J. Mason, G. Wrzesinska, R. Hofman, C. Jacobs, T. Kielmann, and H.E. Bal. Ibis: A Flexible and Efficient Java-based Grid Programming Environment. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 17:1079–1107, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. F.M. Vos, R.E. van Gelder, I.W.O. Serlie, J. Florie, C.Y. Nio, A.S. Glas, F.H. Post, R. Truyen, F.A. Gerritsen, and J. Stoker. Three-dimensional Display Modes for CT Colonography: Conventional 3D Virtual Colonoscopy versus Unfolded Cube Projection. Radiology, 228:878–885, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references