[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Basic observables for processes

  • Session 12:Process Equivalences
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1256))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a general approach to define behavioural preorders over process terms by considering the pre-congruences induced by three basic observables. These observables provide information about the initial communication capabilities of processes and about their possibility of engaging in an infinite internal chattering. We show that some of the observables-based pre-congruences do correspond to behavioral preorders long studied in the literature. The coincidence proofs shed light on the differences between the must preorder of De Nicola and Hennessy and the fair/should preorder of Cleaveland and Natarajan and of Brinksma, Rensink and Vogler, and on the rôle played in their definition by tests for internal chattering.

Work partially supported by EEC: HCM project EXPRESS, by CNR project “Specifica ad alto livello e verifica formale di sistemi digitali” and by Istituto di Elaborazione delPInformazione CNR, Pisa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Abramsky. The lazy lambda calculus. Research Topics in Functional Programming, David Turner, ed., Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Bloom, S. Istrail, A.R. Meyer. Bisimulation can't be traced. Journal of the ACM, 42(1):232–268, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Brinksma, A. Rensink, W. Vogler. Fair Testing. Proceedings of CONCUR'95, LNCS 962, pages 313–327, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Brinksma, A. Rensink, W. Vogler. Applications of Fair Testing. In R. Gotzhein and J. Bredereke, ed., Formal Description Techniques IX, Chapman & Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.D. Brookes, C.A.R. Hoare, A.W. Roscoe. A theory of communicating sequential processes. Journal of the ACM, 31(3):560–599, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. de Nicola, M.C.B. Hennessy. Testing Equivalence for Processes. Theoretical Computers Science, 34:83–133, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. De Nicola, M.C.B. Hennessy. CCS without τ's. Proceedings of TAPSOFT'87, LNCS 249, pages 138–152, Springer, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Ferreira. Semantic Theories for Concurrent ML. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sussex, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Fournet, G. Gonthier, J.-L. Lévy, L. Maranget, D. Rémy. A Calculus of Mobile Agents. Proceedings of CONCUR'96, LNCS 1119, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.C.B. Hennessy. Algebraic Theory of Processes. MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.C.B. Hennessy. Observing Processes. In Linear Time, Branching Time and Partial Order in Logics and Models for Concurrency, LNCS 354, Springer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Laneve. May and Must Testing in the Join-Calculus. Technical Report UBLCS96-4, Università di Bologna, Dept. of Computer Science, Bologna, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.G. Main. Trace, Failure and Testing Equivalences for Communicating Processes. Int. Journal of Parallel Programming, 16(5):383–400, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall International, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Milner, D. Sangiorgi. Barbed Bisimulation. Proceedings of ICALP'92, LNCS 623, Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.-H. Morris. Lambda Calculus Models of Programming Languages. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Natarajan, R. Cleaveland. Divergence and Fair Testing. Proceedings of ICALP'95, LNCS 944, pages 648–659, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.-H.L. Ong. Correspondence between operational and denotational semantics: the full abstraction problem for PCF. Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, vol.4, S. Abramsky, D.M. Gabbay and T.S.E. Maibaum, ed., Oxford Science Publ., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.D. Plotkin. A Structural Approach to Operational Semantics. Technical Report DAIMI FN-19, Aarhus University, Dept. of Computer Science, Aarhus, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.H. Reppy. Concurrent ML: Design, application and semantics. Proceedings of Functional Programming, Concurrency, Simulation and Automata Reasoning, LNCS 693, pages 165–198, Springer, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Vogler. Failures Semantics and Deadlocking of Modular Petri Nets. Acta Informatica, 26:333–348, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pierpaolo Degano Roberto Gorrieri Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boreale, M., de Nicola, R., Pugliese, R. (1997). Basic observables for processes. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_204

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_204

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63165-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69194-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics