[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Isatis: A customizable distributed object-based runtime system

  • Distributed Operating Systems
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Object-Based Parallel and Distributed Computation (OBPDC 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1107))

  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses the design and implementation of a customizable distributed object-based runtime system. Our main goal in the system's design was to provide a distributed object-based system supporting execution of various (concurrent) object-oriented languages, and that can be easily enriched with mechanisms for object management so as to fit the applications' needs. Enrichment of the runtime system with a particular mechanism is illustrated through the integration of a facility that is aimed at enhancing the applications' performance. This goal is achieved by means of a load balancing strategy that implements initial-placement of method executions and migration of data objects according to both the processors' load and the objects' features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Accetta, R. Baron, W. Bolosky, D. Golub, R. Rashid, A. Tevanian, and M. Young. Mach: A new kernel foundation for Unix development. In Proceedings of the Usenix 1986 summer Conference, pages 93–112, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. America. Pool-T: a parallel object-oriented language. In Object-Oriented Concurrent Programming, pages 199–220. MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. America. A Behavioural Approach to Subtyping in Object-Oriented Programming Languages. Technical report, Philips Research Laboratory, Eindhoven, The Netherland, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. E. Anderson. The Case for Application-Specific Operating Systems. Technical Report UCB/CSD 93/738, Computer Science Division, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. S. Auerbach, A. S. Gopal, M. T. Kennedy, and J. R. Russel. Concert/C: Supporting distributed programming with language extensions and portable multiprotocol runtime. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 152–159, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. Banâtre and M. Banâtre, editors. Les systèmes distribués: l'expérience du système Gothic. InterEditions, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.P. Banâtre, M. Banâtre, and G. Muller. Ensuring data security and integrity with a fast stable storage. In Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 285–293, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Banâtre, Y. Belhamissi, V. Issarny, I. Puaut, and J. P. Routeau. Arche: A framework for parallel object-oriented programming above a distributed architecture. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 510–517, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Banâtre, Y. Belhamissi, V. Issarny, I. Puaut, and J. P. Routeau. Adaptive placement of method executions within a customizable distributed object-based system: Design, implementation and performance. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 279–287, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Barak and A. Shiloh. A distributed load balancing facility for a multicomputer. Software Practice and Experience, 15(9):901–913, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Belhamissi. Placement des calculs et des données dans un système distribué à objets. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Rennes I, Rennes, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Benveniste and V. Issarny. Concurrent Programming Notations in the Object-Oriented Language Arche. Research Report 1822, INRIA, Rennes, France, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B.N. Bershad, S. Savage, P. Pardyak, E. Gunder, M. Fiuczynski, D. Becker, S. Eggers, and C. Chambers. Extensibility, safety, and performance in the Spin operating system. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 267–284, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Birrel, G. Nelson, S. Owicki, and E. Wobber. Network objects. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 217–230, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Bryce, V. Issarny, G. Muller, and I. Puaut. Towards safe and efficient customization in distributed systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth SIGOPS European Workshop: Matching Operating Systems to Application Needs, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Bryce and G. Muller. Matching micro-kernels to modern applications using fine-grained memory protection. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. H. Campbell, N. Islam, R. Johnson, P. Kougiouris, and P. Madany. Choices: Framework and refinement. In Proceedings of the 1991 International Workshop on Object Orientation in Operating Systems, pages 9–15, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Y. Chevalier, A. Freyssinet, D. Hagimont, S. Krakowiak, S. Lacourte, J. Mossière, and X. Rousset de Pina. Persistent shared object support in the Guide system: Evaluation and related work. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications, pages 129–144, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. S. Chin and S. S. Chanson. Distributed object-based programming systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 23(1):91–124, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Crane. The Rex Lightweight Process Library. Technical report, Imperial College, London, UK, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Dasgupta, R. C. Chen, S. Menon, M. P. Pearson, R. Ananthanrayanan, R. J. LeBlanc, M. Ahamad, U. Ramachandra, W. F. Appelbe, J. M. Bernabéu-Auban, P. W. Hutto, M. Y. A. Khalidi, and C. J. Wilkenoh. The design and implementation of the Clouds distributed operating system. Computing Systems, 4(3):243–275, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. R. Engler, M. Franz Kaashoek, and J. O'Toole. Exokernel: An operating system architecture for application-level resource management. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 251–266, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. C. Fishburn. A survey of multi-attributes/multi-criteria evaluation theories. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science 155, pages 181–224. Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. A. Geist and V. S. Sunderam. Network-based concurrent computing on the PVM system. Concurrency: Practice and Experience, 4(4):293–311, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. G. Gouda and T. Herman. Adaptive programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(9):911–921, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Hamilton, M. L. Powell, and J. G. Mitchell. Subcontract: A flexible base for distributed programming. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 69–79, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. J. Hou, K. G. Shin, and T. K. Tsukada. Transparent load sharing in distributed systems: Decentralized design alternatives based on the condor package. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, pages 202–211, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. M. Huang and C. V. Ravishankar. Designing an agent synthesis system for cross-Rpc communication. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(3):188–198, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. Issarny, G. Muller, and I. Puaut. Efficient treatment of failures in RPC systems. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, pages 170–180, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Kafura, M. Mukherji, and D. W. Washabaugh. Concurrent and distributed garbage collection of active objects. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Krakowiak, M. Meysembourg, H. Nguyen van, M. Riveil, and C. Roisin. Design and implementation of an object-oriented strongly typed language for distributed applications. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 3:11–22, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Lea, C. Jacquemot, and E. Pillevesse. Cool: System support for distributed object-oriented programming. Communications of the ACM, 36(9), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Lea, Y. Yokote, and J. Itoh. Adaptive operating system design using reflection. In Proceedings of the French-Japanese Workshop on Object-Based Parallel and Distributed Computation, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Liskov. Distributed programming in Argus. Communications of the ACM, 31(3):300–312, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. Liskov and J. Wing. A new definition of the subtype relation. In Proceedings of ECOOP'93, pages 118–141, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Odjik. The DOOM system and its applications: A survey of Esprit 415 subproject A, Philips research laboratory. In Proceedings of PARLE — Parallel Architectures and Languages Europe, pages 461–479, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Pu, T. Autrey, A. Black, C. Consel, C. Cowan, J. Inouye, L. Kethana, J. Walpole, and K. Zhang. Optimistic incremental specialization: Streamlining a commercial operating system. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1995. 314–329.

    Google Scholar 

  38. I. Puaut. A distributed garbage collector for active objects. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. K. Raj, E. Tempero, H. M. Levy, A. P. Black, N. C. Hutchinson, and E. Jul. Emerald: A general purpose programming language. Software Practice and Experience, 21(1):91–118, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Rozier, V. Abrossimov, F. Armand, I. Boule, M. Gien, M. Guillemont, F. Herrmann, P. Léonard, S. Langlois, and W. Neuhauser. The Chorus distributed operating system. Computing Systems, 1(4):305–370, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. S. Tanenbaum, R. Van Renesse, H. Van Staveren, G. J. Sharp, S. J. Jansen, and G. Van Rossum. Experiences with the Amoeba distributed operating system. Communications of the ACM, 33:46–63, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y. Yokote. The Apertos reflective operating system: The concept and its implementation. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Pierre Briot Jean-Marc Geib Akinori Yonezawa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Banâtre, M., Belhamissi, Y., Issarny, V., Puaut, I., Routeau, JP. (1996). Isatis: A customizable distributed object-based runtime system. In: Briot, JP., Geib, JM., Yonezawa, A. (eds) Object-Based Parallel and Distributed Computation. OBPDC 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61487-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61487-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61487-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68672-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics