[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Measure, stochasticity, and the density of hard languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 93 (STACS 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 665))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The main theorem of this paper is that, for every real number α<1 (e.g., α=0.99), only a measure 0 subset of the languages decidable in exponential time are \(\leqslant _{n^\alpha - tt}^P\)-reducible to languages that are not exponentially dense. Thus every \(\leqslant _{n^\alpha - tt}^P\)-hard language for E is exponentially dense. This strengthens Watanabe's 1987 result, that every ≤ PO(log n)-tt -hard language for E is exponentially dense. The combinatorial technique used here, the sequentially most frequent query selection, also gives a new, simpler proof of Watanabe's result.

The main theorem also has implications for the structure of NP under strong hypotheses. Ogiwara and Watanabe (1991) have shown that the hypothesis P ≠ NP implies that every ≤ Pbtt -hard language for NP is nonsparse (i.e., not polynomially sparse). Their technique does not appear to allow significant relaxation of either the query bound or the sparseness criterion. It is shown here that a stronger hypothesis—namely, that NP does not have measure 0 in exponential time—implies the stronger conclusion that, for every real α<1, every \(\leqslant _{n^\alpha - tt}^P\)-hard language for NP is exponentially dense. Evidence is presented that this stronger hypothesis is reasonable.

Also presented here (and used in proving the main theorem) is a weak stochasticity theorem, ensuring that almost every language in E is statistically unpredictable by feasible deterministic algorithms, even with linear nonuniform advice.

This author's research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-9157382, with matching funds from Rockwell International, and in part by DIMACS, where he was a visitor during the first phase of this work.

This author's research, performed while visiting Iowa State University, was supported in part by the ESPRIT EC project 3075 (ALCOM), in part by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-9157382, and in part by Spanish Government grant FPI PN90.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Alon and J. H. Spencer, The Probabilistic Method, Wiley, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Arvind, J. Köbler, and M. Mundhenk, Bounded truth-table and conjunctive reductions to sparse and tally sets, Technical report. University of Ulm, 1992. Technical Report Ulmer Informatik-Berichte 92-01.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Berman and J. Hartmanis, On isomorphism and density of NP and other complete sets, SIAM Journal on Computing 6 (1977), pp. 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Erdös, Some remarks on the theory of graphs, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 53 (1947), pp. 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Erdös and J. Spencer, Probabilistic Methods in Combinatorics, Academic Press, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Fu, With quasi-linear queries EXP is not polynomial time Turing reducible to sparse sets, manuscript, August 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. A. Hemachandra, M. Ogiwara, and O. Watanabe, How hard are sparse sets?, Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, 1992, pp. 222–238. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. W. Juedes and J. H. Lutz, The complexity and distribution of hard problems, Technical Report 92-23, Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, 1992. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. W. Juedes and J. H. Lutz, Kolmogorov complexity, complexity cores, and the distribution of hardness, In O. Watanabe, editor, Kolmogorov Complexity and Computational Complexity. Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp. 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. M. Karp and R. J. Lipton, Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes, Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1980, pp. 302–309, also published as Turing machines that take advice, L'Enseignement Mathematique 28 (1982), pp. 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. N. Kolmogorov and V. A. Uspenskii, Algorithms and randomness, translated in Theory of Probability and its Applications 32 (1987), pp. 389–412.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. Lutz, Intrinsically pseudorandom sequences, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. H. Lutz, Resource-bounded measure, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. H. Lutz, An upward measure separation theorem, Theoretical Computer Science 81 (1991), pp. 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. H. Lutz, Almost everywhere high nonuniform complexity, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 44 (1992), pp. 220–258.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. H. Lutz and E. Mayordomo. Measure, stochasticity, and the density of hard languages. Technical Report 92-11, Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, 1992. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. H. Lutz and W. J. Schmidt, Circuit size relative to pseudorandom oracles, Theoretical Computer Science A 107 (1993), to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. R. Mahaney, Sparse complete sets for NP: Solution of a conjecture of Berman and Hartmanis, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 25 (1982), pp. 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Mayordomo, Almost every set in exponential time is P-bi-immune, Seventeenth International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 1992. Springer-Verlag, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. R. Meyer, 1977, reported in [3].

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Ogiwara and O. Watanabe, On polynomial bounded truth-table reducibility of NP sets to sparse sets, SIAM Journal on Computing 20 (1991), pp. 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. L. Selman, 1992, personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948), pp. 379–423, 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. E. Shannon, The synthesis of two-terminal switching circuits, Bell System Technical Journal 28 (1949), pp. 59–98.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. H. Spencer, Ten Lectures on the Probabilistic Method, SIAM, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. J. Stockmeyer, The polynomial-time hierarchy, Theoretical Computer Science 3 (1977), pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. A. Uspenskii, A. L. Semenov, and A. Kh. Shen', Can an individual sequence of zeros and ones be random?, Russian Mathematical Surveys 45 (1990), pp. 121–189.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O. Watanabe, On the Structure of Intractable Complexity Classes, PhD thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O. Watanabe, Polynomial time reducibility to a set of small density, Proceedings of the Second Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, 1987, pp. 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. B. Wilson, Relativized circuit complexity, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 31 (1985), pp. 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

P. Enjalbert A. Finkel K. W. Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lutz, J.H., Mayordomo, E. (1993). Measure, stochasticity, and the density of hard languages. In: Enjalbert, P., Finkel, A., Wagner, K.W. (eds) STACS 93. STACS 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 665. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56503-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56503-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56503-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47574-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics