[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Unambiguity and fewness for logarithmic space

  • Commanications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 529))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider various types of unambiguity and fewness for log space bounded Turing machines and polynomial time bounded log space auxiliary pushdown automata. In particular, we introduce the notions of (general), reach, and strong unambiguity and fewness. We demonstrate that closure under complement of unambiguous classes implies equivalence of unambiguity and “unambiguous fewness”. This, as we will show, applies in the cases of reach and strong unambiguity for log space. Among the many relations we exhibit, we show that the unambiguous linear contextfree languages, which are not known to be contained in deterministic log space, nevertheless are contained in strongly unambiguous log space, and, consequently, are log space reducible to deterministic contextfree languages.

This research was supported by DFG-SFB 342, Teilprojekt A4 “KLARA”.

Part of the research was done while this author was a guest of SFB-342, A4, at the Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Àlvarez and B. Jenner. A very hard log space counting class. In Proc. of 5th Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory, pages 154–168, 1990. (To appear in a Special Issue of Theoretical Computer Science).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. W. Allender. The complexity of sparse sets in P. In Proc. of 1st Structure in Complexity Conf., number 223 in LNCS, pages 1–11. Springer, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Balcácar, J. Diáz, and J. Gabárro. Structural Complexity Theory I+II. Springer, 1988/1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Buntrock, C. Damm, U. Hertrampf, and C. Meinel. Structure and importance of logspace-MOD-classes. In Proc. of 7th STACS, To appear in LNCS. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Buntrock, L. A. Hemachandra, and D. Siefkes. Using inductive counting to simulate nondeterministic computation. In Proc. of 15th MFCS, number 452 in LNCS, pages 187–194. Springer, 1990. (to appear in Information and Computation).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Cai and L. A. Hemachandra. On the power of parity polynomial time. In Proc. of 6th STACS, number 349 in LNCS, pages 229–239. Springer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Cook. Characterizations of pushdown machines in terms of time-bounded computers. Journal of the ACM, 18:4–18, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Dymond and W. L. Ruzzo. Parallel RAMs with owned global memory and deterministic language recognition. In Proc. of 13th ICALP, number 226 in LNCS, pages 95–104. Springer, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Grollmann and A. Selman. Complexity measures for public-key cryptosystems. SIAM Journal of Computing, 17:309–335, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Immerman. Nondeterministic space is closed under complement. SIAM Journal on Computing, 17(5):935–938, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Jenner and B. Kirsig. Alternierung und Logarithmischer Platz. Dissertation, Universität Hamburg, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Jenner, B. Kirsig, and K.-J. Lange. The logarithmic alternation hierarchy collapses. Inform. and Comp., 80:269–288, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Ladner and N. Lynch. Relativization of questions about log space computability. Math. Systems Theory, 10:19–32, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.-J. Lange and P. Rossmanith. Characterizing unambiguous augmented pushdown automata by circuits. In Proc. of 15th MFCS, number 452 in LNCS, pages 399–406. Springer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Niepel. Personal communication, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Niedermeier and P. Rossmanith. Unambiguous Simulations of Auxiliary Pushdown Automata and Circuits. SFB-Bericht 342/31/90 A, I9054, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Rossmanith. The owner concept for PRAMs. In Proc. of 8th STACS, number 480 in LNCS, pages 172–183. Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. L. Ruzzo, J. Simon, and M. Tompa. Space-bounded hierarchies and probabilistic computations. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 28:216–230, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. H. Sudborough. On the tape complexity of deterministic context-free languages. Journal of the ACM, 25:405–414, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Szelepcsényi. The method of forced enumeration for nondeterministic automata. Acta Informatica, 26:279–284, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Valiant. The relative complexity of checking and evaluating. Inform. Proc. Letters, 5:20–23, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

L. Budach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buntrock, G., Jenner, B., Lange, KJ., Rossmanith, P. (1991). Unambiguity and fewness for logarithmic space. In: Budach, L. (eds) Fundamentals of Computation Theory. FCT 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 529. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54458-5_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54458-5_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38391-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics