An Evaluation of the Spearmint Approach to Software Process Modelling

1. ARIS.http://www.ids-scheer.de (29/11/00)

2. Sergio Bandinelli, Alfonso Fuggetta, Carlo Ghezzi and Luigi Lavazza, “ SPADE: An Environment for Software Process Analysis, Design and Enactment”, GOODSTEP Technical Report No 020, March 1994.

   Google Scholar 

3. Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Dirk Hamann, Ralf Kempkens, Peter Rösch, Martin Verlage, Richard Webby, Jörg Zettel. “Support for the Process Engineer: The Spearmint Approach to Software Process Definition and Process Guidance”. Matthias Jarke, Andreas Oberweis (Eds.): Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference CAiSE’99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1626, pp. 119–133. Springer, 1999.

   Google Scholar 

4. Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Louise Scott and Jörg Zettel, “Process engineering with Spearmint(/EPG”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 791–792, 2000.

   Google Scholar 

5. B. Curtis, M. I. Kellner and J. Over. Process Modelling. Communications of the ACM, 35(9):75–90, September 1992.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Xavier Franch and Josep M. Ribo, “ PROMENADE: A Modular Approach to Software Process Modelling and Enaction” Department de Llenguatges: Sistemes Informatics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya Technical Report No LSI-99-13-R, 1999.

   Google Scholar 

7. D. Höltje, N. H. Madhavji, T. Bruckhaus, W. Hong, “Eliciting Formal Models of Software Engineering Processes”, Proceedings of the 1994 CAS Conference, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

8. INCOME V4. http://www.promatis.com (29/11/00)

9. ISO/IEC 12207:1995 Information Technology-Software Life Cycle Processes, International Standards Organization, 1995.

   Google Scholar 

10. IThink. http://www.ithink.com (29/11/00)

11. M.L. Jaccheri, P. Lago, G.P. Picco, Eliciting Software Process Models with the E3 Language, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 7:4, October 1998, pages 368–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Peter Rösch, Martin Verlage and Richard Webby, “SPEARMINT-A Prototype Tool for Visualising Complex Software Processes”, Fraunhofer IESE Report 058.97/E, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

13. L. Scott, R. Jeffery and U. Becker-Kornstaedt, “Preliminary Results of an Industrial EPG Evaluation”, Technical Report Number 01/1, Centre for Advanced Software Engineering Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

14. Richard Webby and Ulrike Becker: “Towards a Logical Schema Integrating Software Process Modeling and Software Measurement.” Presented at PMESSE’ 97 at ICSE 19, Boston, USA, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

15. Richard Webby, Peter Rösch and Martin Verlage, “Spearmint: an Integrated Approach to Software Process Visualisation”, accepted for publication in the Transactions of the Society for Design and Process Science Journal of Design & Process Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references