[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Layered Transducing Term Rewriting System and Its Recognizability Preserving Property

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2378))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A term rewriting system which effectively preserves recognizability (EPR-TRS) has good mathematical properties. In this paper, a new subclass of TRSs, layered transducing TRSs (LT-TRSs) is defined and its recognizability preserving property is discussed. The class of LT-TRSs contains some EPR-TRSs, e.g., f(x) → f(g(x)) which do not belong to any of the known decidable subclasses of EPR-TRSs. Bottom-up linear tree transducer, which is a well-known computation model in the tree language theory, is a special case of LT-TRS. We present a sufficient condition for an LT-TRS to be an EPR-TRS. Also some properties of LT-TRSs including reachability are shown to be decidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baader, F. and Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brained, W.S.: “Tree generating regular systems,” Inform. and control, 14, pp. 217–231, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coquidé, J.L., Dauchet, M., Gilleron, R. and Vágvölgyi, S.: “Bottom-up tree pushdown automata: classification and connection with rewrite systems,” Theoretical Computer Science, 127, pp. 69–98, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Durand, I. and Middeldorp, A.: “Decidable call by need computations in term rewriting (extended abstract),” Proc. of CADE-14, North Queensland, Australia, LNAI 1249, pp. 4–18, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Genet, T.: “Decidable approximations of sets of descendants and sets of normal forms,” Proc. of RTA98, Tsukuba, Japan, LNCS 1379, pp. 151–165, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gécseq, F. and Steinby, M.: Tree Automata, Académiai Kiadó, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilleron, R.: “Decision problems for term rewriting systems and recognizable tree languages,” Proc. of STACS’91, Hamburg, Germany, LNCS 480, pp. 148–159, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilleron, R. and Tison, S.: “Regular tree languages and rewrite systems,” Fundamenta Informaticae, 24, pp. 157–175, 1995.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gyenizse, P. and Vágvölgyi, S.: “Linear generalized semi-monadic rewrite systems effectively preserve recognizability,” Theoretical Computer Science, 194, pp. 87–122, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacquemard, F.:“Decidable approximations of term rewriting systems,” Proc. of RTA96, New Brunswick, NJ, LNCS 1103, pp. 362–376, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Middeldorp, A.: “Approximating dependency graph using tree automata techniques,” Proc. of Int’l Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning, LNAI 2083, pp. 593–610, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagaya, T. and Toyama, Y.: “Decidability for left-linear growing term rewriting systems,” Proc. of RTA99, Trento, Italy, LNCS 1631, pp. 256–270, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Réty, P.: “Regular sets of descendants for constructor-based rewrite systems,” Proc. of LPAR’99, Tbilisi, Georgia, LNCS 1705, pp. 148–160, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salomaa, K.: “Deterministic tree pushdown automata and monadic tree rewriting systems,” J. Comput. system Sci., 37, pp. 367–394, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Takai, T., Kaji, Y. and Seki, H.: “Right-linear finite path overlapping term rewriting systems effectively preserve recognizability,” Proc. of RTA2000, Norwich, U.K., LNCS 1833, pp. 246–260, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seki, H., Takai, T., Fujinaka, Y., Kaji, Y. (2002). Layered Transducing Term Rewriting System and Its Recognizability Preserving Property. In: Tison, S. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2378. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45610-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45610-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43916-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45610-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics