[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Supervised Learning: A Generalized Rough Set Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2005))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Classification rules induction is a central problem addressed by machine learning and data mining. Rough sets theory is an important tool for data classification. Traditional rough sets approach, however, pursuits the fully correct or certain classification rules without considering other factors such as uncertain class labeling, importance of examples, as well as the uncertainty of the final rules. A generalized rough sets model, GRS, is proposed and a classification rules induction approach based on GRS is suggested. Our approach extends the variable precision rough sets model and attempts to reduce the inuence of noise by considering the importance of each training example and handling the uncertain class labels. The final classification rules are also measured with the uncertainty factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P. and Uthurusamy, R. (1996) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, X. and Cercone, N. (1996) Mining Knowledge Rules from Databases: An Rough Set Approach, in Proc. of the 12th International Conf. on Data Engineering, 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, X. and Cercone, N. (1999) Data Mining via Generalization, Discretization and Rough Set Feature Selection, Knowledge and Information System: An International Journal 1(1), 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, T. Y. and Cercone, N. (1997) Applications of Rough Sets Theory and Data Mining, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak, Z. (1991) Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wong, S. K. M., Ziarko, W. and Le, R. L. (1986). Comparison of Rough-set and Statistical Methods in Inductive Learning. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24, 52–72, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ziarko, W. (1993) Variable Precision Rough Set Model, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 46(1), 39–59.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziarko, W. (1994) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Han, J., Hu, X., Cercone, N. (2001). Supervised Learning: A Generalized Rough Set Approach. In: Ziarko, W., Yao, Y. (eds) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45554-X_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45554-X_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43074-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45554-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics