Keynote Address: Organizational Learning in Dynamic Domains

1. M. S. Ackerman, “Answer Garden: A tool for growing organizational memory,” in MIT Sloan School of Management. Boston, MA, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

2. M. S. Ackerman and C. A. Halverson, “Reexamining Organizational Memory,” Comm. of the ACM, vol. 43, pp. 59–64, 2000.

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. D. W. Aha and R. Weber (Eds.), Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems: Papers from the 2000 Workshop. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, http://www.aic.nrl.navy.mil/AAAI00-ILLS-Workshop/, 2000.

   Google Scholar 

4. K.-D. Altoff, M. Nick, and C. Tautz, “Improving Organizational Memories through User Feedback,” 2nd International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 2000), Oulu, Finland, pp. 27–44, 2000.

   Google Scholar 

5. G. Arango, “Domain Analysis: From Art Form to Engineering Discipline, ”Fifth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 152–159, 1989.

   Google Scholar 

6. J. Arent, J. Nørbjerg, and M. H. Pederson, “Creating Organizational Knowledge in Software Process Improvement,” 2nd International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 2000), Oulu, Finland, 2000.

   Google Scholar 

7. C. Argyris, “Double Loop Learning in Organizations,” Harvard Business Review, vol. Sept-Oct, pp. 115–125, 1977.

   Google Scholar 

8. C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.

   Google Scholar 

9. M. Balabanovic and Y. Shoham, wReferral Web: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering,“ Comm. of the ACM, vol. 40, pp. 66–72, 1997.

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. J. E. Bardram, “Plans and Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems,” Proc. European Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 97), Lancaster, UK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

11. V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and D. Rombach, “Experience Factory,“ in Encyclopedia of Software Engineering: Wiley & Sons, 1994, pp. 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

12. V. Basili, M. Lindvall, and P. Costa, “Implementing the Experience Factory Soncepts as a Set of Experience Bases,” International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE’ 01), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

13. V. R. Basili and H. D. Rombach, “Support for Comprehensive Reuse,” Software Engineering Journal, pp. 303–316, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

14. A. Birk and F. Kröschel, “A Knowledge Management Lifecycle for Experience Packages on Software Engineering Technologies,” 1st International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 1999), Kaiserlautern, FRG, pp. 115–126, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

15. M. Broome and P. Runeson, “Technical Requirements for the Implementation of an Experience Base,” 11th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE’ 99), pp. 87–102, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

16. J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation,”Organization Science, vol. 2, pp. 40–57, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

17. J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, The Social Life of Information: Harvard Univ. Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

18. G. Cugola, “Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 982–1000, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, “Working Knowledge — How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

20. A. Dieberger, P. Dourish, K. HöÖk, P. Resnick, and A. Wexelbat, “Social Navigation: Techniques for Building More Usable Systems,” interactions, vol. 7, pp. 36–45, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. T. Dybå, “Improvisation in Small Software Organizations,” IEEE Software, vol. 17, pp. 82–87, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. R. L. Feldmann, “Developing a Tailored Reuse Repository Structure-Experience and First Results,” 1st International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 1999), Kaiserlautern, FRG, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

23. R. L. Feldmann, M. Nick, and M. Frey, “Towards Industrial-Strength Measurement Programs for Reuse and Experience Repository Systems,” 2nd International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 2000), Oulu, Finland, pp. 7–18, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

24. S. T. Fiorini, J. C. S. do Prado Leite, and C. J. de Lucenda, “Reusing Process Patterns,” 2nd International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 2000), Oulu, Finland, pp. 19–37, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

25. G. Fischer, A. Lemke, and T. Schwab, “Knowledge-Based Help Systems,” Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’ 85), pp. 161–167, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

26. G. Fischer and J. Ostwald, “Knowledge Management: Problems, Promises, Realities, and Challenges,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 16, pp. 60–72, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. S. Henninger, “Accelerating the Successful Reuse of Problem Solving Knowledge Through the Domain Lifecycle,” Fourth International Conference on Software Reuse, Orlando, FL, pp. 124–133, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

28. S. Henninger, “An Environment for Reusing Software Processes,” Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse, Victoria, British Columbia, pp. 103–112, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

29. S. Henninger, “An Evolutionary Approach to Constructing Effective Software Reuse Repositories,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

30. S. Henninger, “Using Software Process to Support Learning Software Organizations,” 1st International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 1999), Kaiserlautern, FRG, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

31. S. Henninger and K. Baumgarten, “A Case-Based Approach to Tailoring Software Processes,” International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 01), Vancouver, B.C., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

32. S. Henninger, K. Lappala, and A. Raghavendran, “An Organizational Learning Approach to Domain Analysis,” 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, Seattle, WA, pp. 95–104, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

33. G. P. Huber, “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures,” Organization Science, vol. 2, pp. 88–115, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

34. C. Johannson, P. Hall, and M. Coquard, “Talk to Paula and Peter — They are Experienced,” 1st International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 1999), Kaiserlautern, FRG, pp. 69–76, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

35. H. Kautz, B. Selman, and M. Shah, “Referral Web: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering,” Comm. of the ACM, vol. 40, pp. 63–65, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. D. H. Kim, “The Link Between Individual and Organizational Learning,” Sloan Management Review, vol. Fall, pp. 37–50, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

37. J. Konstan, B. Miller, D. Maltz, J. L. Herlocker, L. R. Gordon, and J. Riedl, “GroupLens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News,” Comm. of the ACM, vol. 40, pp. 77–87, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. B. Levitt and J. G. March, “Organizational Learning,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, pp. 319–340, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. J. G. March, “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organizational Science, vol. 2, pp. 71–87, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

40. F. Maurer and B. Dellen, “Process Support for Virtual Software Organizations,” 1st International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO 1999), Kaiserlautern, FRG, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

41. E. C. Nevis, A. J. DiBella, and J. M. Gould, “Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems,” Sloan Management Review, vol. 36, pp. 75–85, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

42. I. Nonaka and H. Takeychi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

43. D. O’Leary, “Enterprise Knowledge Management,” IEEE Computer, vol. 31, pp. 54–61, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

44. J. S. Poulin and J. M. Caruso, “A Reuse Metrics and Return on Investment Model,” in Advances in Software Reuse. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993, pp. 152–166.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

45. D. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

46. P. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Currency Doubleday, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

47. U. Shardanand and P. Maes, “Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating “Word of Mouth”,” Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’ 95), Denver, CO, pp. 210–217, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

48. E. W. Stein and V. Zwass, “Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems,” Information Systems Research, vol. 6, pp. 85–117, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. L. Suchman, Plans and Situated Action: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

50. L. Terveen, W. Hill, B. Amento, D. W. McDonald, and J. Creter, “PHOAKS: A System for Sharing Recommendations,” Comm. of the ACM, vol. 40, pp. 59–62, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. L. G. Terveen, P. G. Selfridge, and M. D. Long, “From’ Folklore’ To’ Living Design Memory’,” Proceedings InterCHI’ 93, Amsterdam, pp. 15–22, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

52. J. P. Walsh and G. R. Ungson, “Organizational Memory,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, pp. 57–91, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references