Metadata for Digital Preservation: A Review of Recent Developments

1. Hedstrom, M.: Digital Preservation: a Time Bomb for Digital Libraries. Computers and the Humanities 31 (1998) 189–202

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Beagrie N., Greenstein, D.: A Strategic Policy Framework for Creating and Preserving Digital Collections. Library Information Technology Centre, London (1998)

   Google Scholar 

3. Ross, S.: Consensus, Communication and Collaboration: Fostering Multidisciplinary Cooperation in Electronic Records. In: Proceedings of the DLM-Forum on Electronic Records, Brussels, 18–20 December 1996. INSAR: European Archives News, Supplement II. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1997) 330–336

   Google Scholar 

4. Lynch, C.: Canonicalization: a Fundamental Tool to Facilitate Preservation and Management of Digital Information D-Lib Magazine 5 (September 1999) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september99/09lynch.html

5. Day, M.: Issues and Approaches to Preservation Metadata. In: Guidelines for Digital Imaging. National Preservation Office, London (1999) 73–84

   Google Scholar 

6. Dollar, C.M.: Machine-Readable Records of the Federal Government and the National Archives. In: Geda, C.L., Austin, E.W., Blouin, F.X. (eds.): Archivists and Machine-Readable Records. Society of American Archivists, Chicago, Ill. (1980) 79–88

   Google Scholar 

7. Bearman, D.: Electronic Evidence: Strategies for Managing Records in Contemporary Organizations. Archives and Museum Informatics, Pittsburgh, Pa. (1994)

   Google Scholar 

8. O’Shea, G.: Keeping Electronic Records: Issues and Strategies. Provenance 1 (March 1996) http://www.netpac.com/provenance/vol1/no2/features/erecs1a.htm

9. McDonald, J.: Managing Information in an Office Systems Environment: the IMOSA Project. American Archivist 58 (1995) 142–153

   Google Scholar 

10. Blake, R.: Overview of the Electronic Records in Office Systems (EROS) Programme. In: Electronic Access: Archives in the New Millennium. Public Record Office, London (1998) 52–58

    Google Scholar 

11. Binns, S.E., Bowen, D.V., Murdock, A.: Migration Strategies Within an Electronic Archive: Practical Experience and Future Research. Archives and Museum Informatics 11 (1997) 301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. McKemmish, S., Parer, D.: Towards Frameworks for Standardising Recordkeeping Metadata. Archives and Manuscripts 26 (1998) 24–45

    Google Scholar 

13. Duff, W.: Ensuring the Preservation of Reliable Evidence: a Research Project Funded by the NHPRC. Archivaria 42 (1996) 28–45

    Google Scholar 

14. Cox, R.J.: More than Diplomatic: Functional Requirements for Evidence in Recordkeeping. Records Management Journal 7 (1997) 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Bearman, D., Duff, W.: Grounding Archival Description in the Functional Requirements for Evidence. Archivaria 41 (1996) 275–303

    Google Scholar 

16. Bearman, D., Sochats, K.: Metadata Requirements for Evidence. University of Pittsburgh, School of Information Science, Pittsburgh, Pa. (1996) http://www.lis.pitt.edu/~nhprc/BACartic.html

    Google Scholar 

17. Cunningham, A.: Journey to the End of the Night: Custody and the Dawning of a New Era on the Archival Threshold. Archives and Manuscripts 24 (1996) 312–321

    Google Scholar 

18. Duranti, L.: The Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. In: Proceedings of the DLM-Forum on Electronic Records, Brussels, 18–20 December 1996. INSAR: European Archives News, Supplement II. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1997) 60–65

    Google Scholar 

19. MacNeil, H.: Metadata Strategies and Archival Description: Comparing Apples to Oranges. Archivaria 39 (1995) 11–21

    Google Scholar 

20. Duranti, L.: Reliability and Authenticity: the Concepts and their Implications. Archivaria 39 (1995) 5–10

    Google Scholar 

21. Gilliland-Swetland, A.J., Eppard, P.B.: Preserving the Authenticity of Contingent Digital Objects: the InterPARES project. D-Lib Magazine, 6 (2000) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july00/eppard/07eppard.html

22. McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Reed, B.: Towards a Framework for Standardising Recordkeeping Metadata: the Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Records Management Journal 9 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

23. National Archives of Australia: Recordkeeping Metadata Standard for Commonwealth Agencies, version 1.0. National Archives of Australia, Canberra (1999) http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/control/rkms/summary.htm

24. State Records Authority of New South Wales: New South Wales Recordkeeping Metadata Standard (NRKMS). State Records Authority of New South Wales, Sydney (2000) http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/publicsector/erk/metadata/rkmetadata.htm

25. Public Record Office Victoria: Standard for the Management of Electronic Records, version 1.0. PROS 99/007. Public Record Office Victoria, Melbourne, (April 2000) http://www.prov.vic.gov.au/gservice/standard/pros9907.htm

26. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems: Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Red Book, Issue 1. CCSDS 650.0-R-1. CCSDS Secretariat, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. (1999) http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa.gov/nost/isoas/ref-model.html

27. Garrett, J., Waters, D. (eds.): Preserving Digital Information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. Commission on Preservation and Access, Washington, D.C. (1996) http://www.rlg.org/ArchTF/

    Google Scholar 

28. Neavill, G.B.: Electronic Publishing, Libraries, and the Survival of Information. Library Resources and Technical Services 28 (1984) 76–89

    Google Scholar 

29. Hedstrom, M., Montgomery, S.: Digital Preservation Needs and Requirements in RLG Member Institutions. Research Libraries Group, Mountain View, Calif. (1998) http://www.rlg.org/preserv/digpres.html

    Google Scholar 

30. RLG Working Group on Preservation Issues of Metadata: Final Report. Research Libraries Group, Mountain View, Calif. (1998) http://www.rlg.org/preserv/presmeta.html

31. National Information Standards Organization: Data Dictionary: Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images. National Information Standards Organization, Bethesda, Md. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

32. National Library of Australia: Preserving Access to Digital Information (PADI). National Library of Australia, Canberra http://www.nla.gov.au/padi/

33. National Library of Australia: PANDORA Logical Data Model, Version 2. National Library of Australia, Canberra (10 November 1997) http://www.nla.gov.au/pandora/ldmv2.html

34. Phillips, M., Woodyard, D., Bradley, K., Webb, C.: Preservation Metadata for Digital Collections: Exposure Draft. National Library of Australia, Canberra (1999) http://www.nla.gov.au/preserve/pmeta.html

    Google Scholar 

35. Russell, K.: Digital Preservation and the Cedars Project Experience. New Review of Academic Librarianship 6 (2000) 139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Day, M.: Metadata for Preservation. UKOLN, the UK Office for Library and Information Networking, Bath (1998) http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/cedars/AIW01.html

    Google Scholar 

37. Russell, K., Sergeant, D., Stone, A., Weinberger, E., Day, M.: Metadata for Digital Preservation. Cedars Project, Leeds (2000) http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/metadata.html

    Google Scholar 

38. Lupovici, C., Masanès, J.: Metadata for the Long Term Preservation of Electronic Publications. NEDLIB Report Series, 2. Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague (2000)

    Google Scholar 

39. OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata: Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects: a Review of the State of the Art. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin, Ohio (2000) http://www.oclc.org/digitalpreservation/wgdeliver.htm

40. Werf, T. van der: The Deposit System for Electronic Publications: a process model. NED-LIB Report Series, 6. Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references