[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

What Do We Learn from Experimental Algorithmics?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2000 (MFCS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1893))

  • 548 Accesses

Abstract

Experimental Algorithmics is concerned with the design, implementation, tuning, debugging and performance analysis of computer programs for solving algorithmic problems. It provides methodologies and tools for designing, developing and experimentally analyzing efficient algorithmic codes and aims at integrating and reinforcing traditional theoretical approaches for the design and analysis of algorithms and data structures.

In this paper we survey some relevant contributions to the field of Experimental Algorithmics and we discuss significant examples where the experimental approach helped in developing new ideas, in assessing heuristics and techniques, and in gaining a deeper insight about existing algorithms.

This work has been partially supported by the European Commission (Project ALCOM-FT), by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (Project “Algorithms for Large Data Sets: Science and Engineering”) and by CNR, the Italian National Research Council.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.V. Aho, J.E. Hopcroft, and J.D. Ullman. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison Wesley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.K. Ahuia, T.L. Magnanti, and J.B. Orlin. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Anderson. The role of experiment in the theory of algorithms. In Proceedings of the 5th DIMACS Challenge Workshop, 1996. Available over the Internet at the URL: http://www.cs.amherst.edu/dsj/methday.html.

  4. C. Berge and A. Ghouila-Houri. Programming, Games and Transportation Networks. Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Bilardi, P. D’Alberto, and A. Nicolau. Fractal matrix multiplication: a case study on portability of cache performance. Manuscript, May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.H. Brown. Algorithm Animation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.H. Brown. Zeus: a System for Algorithm Animation and Multi-View Editing. In Proceedings of the 7-th IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, pages 4–9, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Cattaneo, U. Ferraro, G.F. Italiano, and V. Scarano. Cooperative Algorithm and Data Types Animation over the Net. In Proc. XV IFIP World Computer Congress, Invited Lecture, pages 63–80, 1998. System Home Page: http://isis.dia.unisa.it/catai/.

  9. B.V. Cherkassky. A Fast Algorithm for Computing Maximum Flow in a Network. In A.V. Karzanov editor, Collected Papers, Issue 3: Combinatorial Methods for Flow Problems, pages 90–96. The Institute for Systems Studies, Moscow, 1979. In Russian. English translation appears in AMS Translations, Vol. 158, pp. 23–30. AMS, Providence, RI, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.V. Cherkassky and A.V. Goldberg. On implementing the push-relabel method for the maximum flow problem. Algorithmica, 19:390–410, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T.H. Cormen, C.E. Leiserson, and R.L. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms. The MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Crescenzi, C. Demetrescu, I. Finocchi, and R. Petreschi. Reversible Execution and Visualization of Programs with LEONARDO. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 11(2), 2000. Leonardo is available at the URL: http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~demetres/Leonardo/.

  13. G.B. Dantzig. Application of the Simplex Method to a Transportation Problem. In T.C. Hoopmans editor, Activity Analysis and Production and Allocation, Wiley, New York, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Demetrescu, C. and Finocchi, I. Break the “Right” Cycles and Get the “Best” Drawing. In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Algorithms and Experimentations (ALENEX’00) San Francisco, CA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Eisenstadt and M. Brayshaw. The transparent prolog machine: An execution model and graphical debugger for logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming, 5(4):1–66, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A.V. Goldberg. Selecting problems for algorithm evaluation. In Proc. 3-rd Workshop on Algorithm Engineering (WAE’99), LNCS 8, pages 1–11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.V. Goldberg and B.M.E. Moret. Combinatorial algorithms test sets [CATS]: The ACM/EATCS platform for experimental research (short). In SODA: ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.R. Henry, K.M. Whaley, and B. Forstall. The University of Washington Program Illustrator. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN’90 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 223–233, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Johnson. A theoretician’s guide to the experimental analysis of algorithms. In Proceedings of the 5th DIMACS Challenge Workshop, 1996. Available over the Internet at the URL: http://www.cs.amherst.edu/dsj/methday.html.

  20. D. Klingman, A. Napier, and J. Stutz. Netgen: A program for generating large scale capacitated assignment, transportation, and minimum cost network flow problems. Management Science, 20:814–821, 1974.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Donald E. Knuth. Stanford GraphBase: A platform for combinatorial algorithms. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 41–43, New York, NY 10036, USA, 1993. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.P. Lahtinen, E. Sutinen, and J. Tarhio. Automated Animation of Algorithms with Eliot. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 9:337–349, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Leong, P. Shor, and C. Stein. Implementation of a combinatorial multicommodity flow algorithm. In D.S. Johnon and C. McGeoch, eds., Network Flows and Matching: First DIMACS Implementation Challenge, pages 387–406, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. McGeoch. A bibliography of algorithm experimentation. In Proceedings of the 5th DIMACS Challenge Workshop, 1996. Available over the Internet at the URL: http://www.cs.amherst.edu/dsj/methday.html.

  25. K. Mehlhorn and S. Naher. LEDA, a platform for combinatorial and geometric computing. Communications of the ACM, 38:96–102, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B.M.E. Moret. Towards a discipline of experimental algorithmics. In Proceedings of the 5th DIMACS Challenge Workshop, 1996. Available over the Internet at the URL: http://www.cs.amherst.edu/dsj/methday.html.

  27. B.M.E. Moret and H.D. Shapiro. An empirical assessment of algorithms for constructing a minimal spanning tree. Computational Support for Discrete Mathematics N. Dean and G. Shannon eds. DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 15:99–117, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.C. Roman, K.C. Cox, C.D. Wilcox, and J.Y Plun. PAVANE: a System for Declarative Visualization of Concurrent Computations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 3:161–193, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Skiena. Who is interested in algorithms and why? lessons from the stony brook algorithms repository. In Proc. Workshop on Algorithm Engineering (WAE’98), pages 204–212, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.T. Stasko. The Path-Transition Paradigm: a Practical Methodology for Adding Animation to Program Interfaces. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 1(3):213–236, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J.T. Stasko. A Methodology for Building Application-Specific Visualizations of Parallel Programs. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 18:258–264, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J.T. Stasko, J. Domingue, M.H. Brown, and B.A. Price. Software Visualization: Programming as a Multimedia Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demetrescu, C., Italiano, G.F. (2000). What Do We Learn from Experimental Algorithmics?. In: Nielsen, M., Rovan, B. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2000. MFCS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1893. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44612-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44612-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67901-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44612-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics