Abstract
Chat is used in many learning scenarios and platforms for synchronous communication support. Up to now evaluation of chat communication requires time consuming manual coding and analysis of the chat transcript. In this paper we present a method that combines manual and automatic steps: (1) chat transcripts are manually referenced, i.e. for each chat contribution it is determined to which previous contribution it refers to. (2) the referenced chat transcripts are structurally analysed by calculating different measures. The results of this structure analysis help to evaluate the learning chat and indicate where further (manual) analyses might be helpful. In addition, the ability of chat to support a certain type of learning scenario can be evaluated. We then discuss how chat can be improved by providing functionality for explicit referencing to the participants during the chat. The evaluation of a university seminar in the winter term 2004/2005 that used the tool KOLUMBUS Chat shows that references are used to different extents and not continuously. We analyse the reasons for (not) using explicit references. The results provide hints about the technical and organisational design for learning chats using references.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Churchill, E.F., Trevor, J., Bly, S., Nelson, L., Cubranic, D.: Anchored Conversations: Chatting in the Context of a Document. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 454–461 (2000)
Garcia, A., Jacobs, J.: The Interactional Organization of Computer-mediated Communication in the College Classroom. Qualitative Sociology 21(3), 299–317 (1998)
Gerosa, M., Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., Lucena, C.: Analyzing discourse structure to coordinate educational forums. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 262–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2004), (Last access 2006/04/10) available online at: http://ritv.les.inf.puc-rio.br/publicacoes/ITS2004.pdf
Henri, F.: Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye, A.R. (ed.) Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, pp. 115–136. Springer, New York (1992)
Herring, S.: Dynamic topic analysis of synchronous chat. In: New Research for New Media: Innovative Research Methodologies Symposium Working Papers and Readings. U. of Minnesota School of Journalism & Mass Communication, Minneapolis, MN (2003)
Holmer, T.: Diskursstrukturanalyse der Chatkommunikation. Dissertation, TU Darmstadt (in preparation, 2006) (Discourse structure analysis, PhD thesis)
Kienle, A.: The integration of asynchronous and synchronous communication support in cooperative systems. In: The 7th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP) (accepted, 2006)
Leponiemi, J.: Visualizing Discussion History. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 15(1), 121–134 (2003)
McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., Scanlon, E.: Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20(3), 194–204 (2004)
Mühlpfordt, M., Wessner, M.: Explicit Referencing In Chat Supports Collaborative Learning. In: Proceedings of the CSCL 2005, Taipei, Taiwan (2005)
Münzer, S., Linder, U., Hoffmann, A., Balzer, E.: Gemeinsam online Lernen: Das Prozessmodell für Konzeption, Durchführung und Qualitätssicherung (Joint online learning: the process model for conception, realisation and quality ensurance). In: Münzer, S., Linder, U. (eds.) Gemeinsam Online Lernen: Vom Design bis zur Evaluation kooperativer Online-Übungen, pp. 92–223. Bertelsmann, Bielefeld (2004)
Schegloff, E.: Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29, 1–63 (2000)
Smith, M., Cadiz, J.J., Burkhalter, B.: Conversation Trees and Threaded Chats. In: Proceedings of the Conference on CSCW, pp. 97–105. ACM Press, New York (2000)
Suthers, D., Xu, J.: Kükäkükä: An Online Environment for Artifact-Centered Discourse. In: Proc. of the Conference WWW 2002, pp. 472–480 (Last access 2006/04/10), available online: http://www2002.org/CDROM/alternate/252/index.html
Rafaeli, S., Sudweeks, F.: Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Com. 2(4) (1997) (Last access 2006/04/10), available online: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
Vronay, D., Smith, M., Drucker, S.: Alternative Interfaces for Chat. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 19–26. ACM, New York (1999)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holmer, T., Kienle, A., Wessner, M. (2006). Explicit Referencing in Learning Chats: Needs and Acceptance. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds) Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing. EC-TEL 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4227. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11876663_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11876663_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45777-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46234-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)