Low-Cost Laser Range Scanner and Fast Surface Registration Approach

1. Pipitone, F.J., Marshall, T.G.: A wide-field scanning triangulation rangefinder for machine vision. International Journal of Robotics Research 2(1), 39–49 (1983)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Hall, E.L., Tio, J.B.K., MCPherson, C.A.: Measuring curved surfaces for robot vision. Computer 15(12), 42–54 (1982)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Blais, F.: Review of 20 years range sensor development. Journal of Electronic Imaging 13(1) (2004)

   Google Scholar 

4. Zagorchev, L., Goshtasby, A.: A paintbrush laser range scanner. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 101, 65–85 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Besl, P.J., McKay, N.D.: A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 14(2), 239–258 (1992)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Krebs, B., Sieverding, P., Korn, B.: A fuzzy ICP algorithm for 3D free form object recognition. In: International Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 539–543 (1996)

   Google Scholar 

7. Dalley, G., Flynn, P.: Pair-wise range image registration: a study in outlier classification. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 87(1-3), 104–115 (2002)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

8. Chua, C.S., Jarvis, R.: Point signatures: A new representation for 3D object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision 25(1), 63–85 (1997)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Papaioannou, G., Theoharis, T.: Fast fragment assemblage using boundary line and surface matching. In: IEEE/CVPR Workshop on Applicat. of Computer Vision in Archaeology (1999)

   Google Scholar 

10. Krebs, B., Korn, B., Wahl, F.M.: Plausibilistic preprocessing of sparse range images. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Image Anal. and Processing, pp. 361–366 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

11. Johnson, A., Hebert, M.: Recognizing objects by matching oriented points. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 684–689 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

12. Schön, N., Häusler, G.: Automatic coarse registration of 3D surfaces. In: Vision, Modeling, and Visualization 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

13. Barequet, G., Sharir, M.: Partial surface matching by using directed footprints. In: 12th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 409–410 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

14. Silva, L., Bellon, O.R.P., Boyer, K.L.: Robust Range Image Registration Using Genetic Algorithms and the Surface Interpenetration Measure. Machine Perception Artificial Intelligence, vol. 60. World Scientific, Singapore (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Winkelbach, S., Rilk, M., Schönfelder, C., Wahl, F.M.: Fast Random Sample Matching of 3d Fragments. In: Rasmussen, C.E., Bülthoff, H.H., Schölkopf, B., Giese, M.A. (eds.) DAGM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3175, pp. 129–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

17. Tsai, R.Y.: An efficient and accurate camera calibration technique for 3d machine vision. In: IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 364–374 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

18. Wahl, E., Hillenbrand, U., Hirzinger, G.: Surflet-pair-relation histograms: A statistical 3d-shape representation for rapid classification. In: Proc. 4th International Conf. on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM 2003), pp. 474–481 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

19. Weisstein, E.W.: Birthday Attack (From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource), http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BirthdayAttack.html

20. Friedman, J.H., Bentley, J.L., Finkel, R.A.: An algorithm for finding best matches in logarithmic expected time. ACM Trans. on Math. Software 3(3), 209–226 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references