Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to modelling embedded agent dialogues. It proposes a specific structure for the supporting information accompanying the arguments that agents exchange during a dialogue, it defines formally how this information relates to the agent theory, and assigns to it semantics that is associated to each of the atomic dialogue types of the Walton-Krabbe typology. This allows the formal definition of necessary and sufficient initiation and acceptance conditions of licit dialectical shifts that are necessary for the modelling of embedded agent dialogues.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proceedings of ICMAS 1998 (1998)
Amgoud, L., Parsons, S.: Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS, vol. 2333. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
GORGIAS. A system for argumentation and abduction (2002), http://www.cs.ucy.ac.cy/~nkd/gorgias
Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: A framework for deliberation dialogues. In: Proceedings of OSSA 2001 (2001)
Kakas, A., Mancarella, P., Dung, P.M.: The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming (1994)
Kakas, A., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: Layered strategies and protocols for argumentation-based agent interaction. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3366, pp. 64–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2003 (2003)
McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Games that agents play: a formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11, 315–334 (2002)
McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: A denotational semantics for deliberation dialogues. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2004 (2004)
Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M.: The mechanics of some formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2922, pp. 329–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3) (1998)
Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2002 (2002)
Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2003 (2003)
Reed, C.: Dialogue frames in agent communication. In: Proceedings of ICMAS 1998 (1998)
Walton, D.N.: Types of dialogues, dialectical shifts and fallacies. In: Argumentation Illuminated (1992)
Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dimopoulos, Y., Kakas, A.C., Moraitis, P. (2006). Argumentation Based Modelling of Embedded Agent Dialogues. In: Parsons, S., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P., Rahwan, I. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4049. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36355-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36356-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)