Computerized Classification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Category 4A Lesions

1. Warren-Burhenne, L.L., Wood, S.A., D’Orsi, C.A., Feig, S.A., Kopans, D.B., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., Sickles, E.A., Tabar, L., Vyborny, C.J., Castellino, R.A.: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215, 554–562 (2000)

   Google Scholar 

2. Ikeda, D.M., Birdwell, R.L., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., Sickles, E.A., Brenner, R.J.: Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology 230, 811–819 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Roque, A.C., Andre, T.C.: Mammography and computerized decision systems: a review. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 980, 83–94 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Gur, D., Sumkin, J.H., Rockette, H.E., Ganott, M., Hakim, C., Hardesty, L., Poller, W.R., Shah, R., Wallace, L.: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96, 185–190 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Doi, K., MacMahon, H., Katswragawa, S., Nishikawa, R.M., Jiang, W.: Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur. J. Radiol. 31, 97–109 (1999)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Lederman, R., Leichter, I., Novak, B., Bamberger, P., Fields, S., Buchbinder, S.: Stratification of mammographic cases by BIRADS category with the assistance of a CAD system. European Radiology 13, 347–353 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

7. Sickles, E.A.: Mammographic features of “early” breast cancer. Am. J. Roengenol 143, 461–464 (1984)

   Google Scholar 

8. Kopans, D.B.: The positive predictive value of mammography. Am. J. Roengenol 158, 521–526 (1992)

   Google Scholar 

9. Fu, J.C., Lee, S.K., Wong, S.T., Yeh, J.Y., Wang, A.H., Wu, H.K.: Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph 9, 419–429 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

10. Papadopoulos, A., Fotiadis, D.I., Likas, A.: Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines. Artif. Intell. Med. 34, 141–150 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Wei, L., Yang, Y., Nishikawa, R.M., Jiang, Y.: A Study on Several Machine-Learning Methods for Classification of Malignant and Benign microcalcifications. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24, 371–380 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Burnside, E.S., Sisney, G.A., Rubin, D.L., Ochsner, J.E., Fowler, K.: The Ability of Microcalcification Descriptors in the BI-RADS, To Stratify the Risk of Malignancy. In: Proc. of 91th RSNA, Chicago, USA, 4th edn. November 27 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

13. Fields, S., Lederman, R., Buchbinder, S., Novak, B., Sklair, M., Bamberger, P., Leichter, I.: Improved mammographic accuracy with CAD assisted ranking of lesions. In: Proc. of the 6th IWDM, Bremen, Germany (June 2002)

    Google Scholar 

14. Fields, S., Leichter, I., Lederman, R., Buchbinder, S., Novak, B., Sklair-Levy, M., Sperber, F., Bamberger, P.: Improving the Performance of Mammographic Assessment by the use of an Advanced Two- tiered CAD/CAC System. In: Proc. of the 7th IWDM, Charlotte, NC, U.S.A (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

15. Leichter, I., Lederman, R., Bamberger, P., Novak, B., Fields, S., Buchbinder, S.: The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms. Invest. Radiol. 34, 394–400 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references