Abstract
Group setup strategy exploits the PCB similarity in forming the families of boards to minimize makespan that is composed of two attributes, the setup time and the placement time. The component similarity of boards in families reduces the setup time between families meanwhile, the geometric similarity reduces the placement time of boards within families. Current group setup strategy considers the component similarity and the geometric similarity by giving equal weights or by considering each similarity sequentially. In this paper, we propose an improved group setup strategy which combines component similarity and geometric similarity simultaneously. The entropy method is used to determine the weight of each similarity by capturing the importance of each similarity in different production environments. Test results show that the entropy based group setup strategy outperforms existing group setup strategies.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askin, R.G., Dror, M., Vakharia, A.J.: Printed circuit board scheduling and component loading in a multimachine, openshop manufacutring cell. Naval Research Logistics 41(5), 587–608 (1994)
Ball, M.O., Magazine, M.J.: Sequencing of insertions in printed circuit board assemblies. Opearations Research 36(2), 192–201 (1988)
Chan, D., Mercier, D.: IC Insertion: An Application of the Traveling Salesman Problem. International Journal of Production Research 27(10), 1837–1841 (1989)
Crama, Y.: Combinatorial optimization models for production scheduling in automated manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research 99, 136–153 (1997)
Crama, Y., Kolen, A.W.J., Oerlemans, A.G., Spieksma, F.C.R.: Throughput rate optimization in the automated assembly of printed circuit boards. Annals of Operations Research 26, 455–480 (1990)
Jonker, R., Volgenant, A.: A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems. Computing 59, 231–340 (1987)
Leon, V.J., Jeong, I.J.: An improved group setup strategy for PCB assembly. In: Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L., Kumar, V., Laganá, A., Lee, H.P., Mun, Y., Taniar, D., Tan, C.J.K. (eds.) ICCSA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3483, pp. 312–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Leon, V.J., Peters, B.A.: Re-planning and analysis of partial setup strategies in printed circuit board assembly systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Special Issue in Electronics Manufacturing 8(4), 389–412 (1996)
Leon, V.J., Peters, B.A.: A comparison of setup strategies for printed circuit board assembly. Computers in Industrial Engineering 34(1), 219–234 (1998)
Lofgren, C.B., McGinnis, L.F.: Dynamic scheduling for flexible printed circuit card assembly. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference, Atlanta, GA (1986)
Quintana, R., Leon, V.J.: An improved group setup management strategy for pick and place SMD assembly. Working paper (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jeong, IJ. (2006). An Entropy Based Group Setup Strategy for PCB Assembly. In: Gavrilova, M., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2006. ICCSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3982. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11751595_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11751595_74
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34075-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34076-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)